1 / 18

Student Growth and Performance Update:

Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non- RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Conneaut Area Schools, NE Region Winter 2013. Ohio RttT /Non- RttT Cohorts. District Demographics .

zelda
Télécharger la présentation

Student Growth and Performance Update:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Conneaut Area Schools, NE Region Winter 2013

  2. Ohio RttT/Non-RttT Cohorts

  3. District Demographics • Type 4 (Small town with high student poverty and average student population) • 1,799 Enrollment • $24,145 Median Income • 62.7% Poverty • 8.5% Minority population • 16.7% Students with Disabilities

  4. Performance Index Gain of 2.4 RttT & Non-RttT Districts(3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

  5. District Performance Index Gain/Loss • Three-year Average before RttT (08-10 LRC) 92.73 • Performance Index 2012-2013 LRC 94.9 • Gain/Loss + 2.17 gain

  6. RttT, Non-RttT & DistrictPerformance Index Gain(3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

  7. Percent of RttTvs Non-RttT DistrictsAdding More than 1 Year’s Growth

  8. Gifted Value Added(based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years)Percent of districts Adding More than 1 year's Growth

  9. SWD Value Added(based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years)Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth (2012-2013 LRC)

  10. Value Added - Lowest 20% (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years)Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth 2012-2013 LRC

  11. Value Added Growth – DistrictA = 2 or more year’s growth B = 1 year of growth, but less than 2C = Greater or equal to -1 but less than +1D = Greater or equal to -2 but less than -1F = Less than -2 F - Overall C - Gifted C - Students With Disabilities A - Lowest 20%

  12. District Performance compared to All Ohio Districts

  13. RttT/Non-RttT 3rdGrade Reading% at or above Proficient(3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

  14. District - 3rd Grade Reading • 77.3% Three-year average before RttT Percent at or above Proficient • 83.6% 2012-13 LRC • 6.3 % Gain

  15. 3rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient(3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

  16. RttT/Non-RttT 4-Year Average Graduation Rate

  17. District Graduation Rate (4 Year) • 2010 Rate 82.3% (“On-time”) • 2012 Rate 83.1% (4-Year Longitudinal) • Gain or Loss: + 0.8%

  18. RttT, Non-RttT & District Graduation Rates

More Related