90 likes | 207 Vues
In March 2014, Jim Warner from the University of California, Santa Cruz, explored the economic implications of exaggerated wireless claims, particularly regarding over-subscription issues that can diminish performance during peak usage. The impact of coverage quality, both indoors and outdoors, is assessed using a crowd-sourced methodology by the FCC and CPUC to collect relevant data. This study analyzes Verizon's LTE performance in a specific survey area, detailing upload and download speeds, ping times, and building penetration tests, providing crucial insights for consumers.
E N D
Wireless Carrier Claims versus Customer Performance Jim Warner University of California Santa Cruz March 2014
Exaggerated claims might have an economic impact. • What about over subscription reducing performance during high use? • What is the effect of indoor v outdoor coverage? Great questions, but not in 10 minutes. • FCC and CPUC will employ crowd source approach to get data.
Verizon reports to the CPUC • Border shows 5 sq mile survey area • Claim: 10-25 Mb/s up • Claim: 3-6 Mb/s down • Elevation: 400 ft to sea level • Area has 6 cell sites
Survey method • Verizon LTE 7 inch tablet • Measurement at every street intersection • No do overs • Ookla speed test
Links • Data for each measured point: upload and download speed, ping time and coords http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/verizon-SC.kml • Test of building envelope penetration http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/in-bldg CPUC data in KML format • http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/mobile-test/