1 / 27

European concepts of Universal service

European concepts of Universal service. Paul Nihoul Louvain (Be), Groningen (Nl). I. Introduction. «  European  ». Yes ./. Member States Concept does not exist at national level – maybe UK ? No otherwise

zlhna
Télécharger la présentation

European concepts of Universal service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. European concepts of Universal service Paul Nihoul Louvain (Be), Groningen (Nl)

  2. I. Introduction

  3. « European » • Yes ./. Member States • Concept does not exist at national level – maybe UK ? • No otherwise • Europe, public services, public ownership, « no regulation », no need for universal service, instructions to board of directors • US, « same services », private ownership, public involvement, regulation, universal service • Example : AT&T • European universal serviceY= going American • application, in Europe, of a concept originating in the US

  4. « Concepts » • One concept … • Meaning • Availability of a service • To all members of a community • At reasonable + equal conditions • Cause • deemed essential to that community • Variation in time • and space

  5. … But not an easy one • Terminology • Polyphony • Interdisciplinarity

  6. Terminology • Communication 1996 • Universal service • Public service • Service of general (economic or non economic) interest • Afterwards • « Ambiguity » continues • SIG used in case law • SU in some regulations • Public service in others

  7. Polyphony • Several speakers • Commission : liberalisation • Art. 86 EC Directive 1996 • Communications 1996, 2003 • Parliament/Council : ONP • 90/387 as amended • ECJ • On regulation • Or on EC Ttreaty • « universal service without a name » • Corbeau, Glöckner

  8. Interdisciplinarity, several sectors • Telecom > electronic communications • Postal services • Energy? • Transportation? • « public utilities »

  9. « interdisciplinarity » • Public utilities • Electronic communications • postal services • Energy ? • Transportation ? • Social security • Health • Pensions • Invalidity, etc.

  10. II. Universal service

  11. Electronic communications • Current situation - One directive – Mechanism • Step 1.- Definition of services which must be made available to all members of a community at certain conditions • What are they ? • Can the list evolve ? • Role of Member States

  12. • Step 2.- Who will ensure their provision ? • Market forces • If not, authorities • Step 3.- How will they act ? • Market forces : free markets • Authorities : • Designation of undertakings • Subsidies : authority, fund • Step 4.- How do they have to be performed ? • Quality • Prices

  13. Postal services • 97/67 as amended lately • What is the US in that sector ? • 3 and 5 • Content ? • 3.3 and 3.4 • How will it be provided ? • …

  14. Until 2008 • Non universal service activities • Activities = free, general authorisations • Universal service activities • Some cannot be reserved, g.a. or individual licences • Some can • Division of activities in 3 categories

  15. Now • Non universal service activities • Activities = free, general authorisations • Universal service activities • general authorisations, individual licences possible > Division of activities in 2 categories

  16. Other sectors • Public service obligations • Electricity • Gas • Transportation

  17. III. Peculiarities

  18. « Revolution » • Beforehand • The authority as source of all activities • « Fiefs » • Summa divisio • One part for markets, economic rules • One part for authority, political rules • Change • The part of authorities is opened to markets

  19. « New articulation Markets-Authorities » • Market failure • Economic theory • Markets first, authorities only if former fails (subsidiarity) • Universal service • Legal theory • Authority first*, Markets second**, authorities third*** • * Define services covered by the regime and conditions under which they must be provided : who ? Quality ? Prices • ** provision • *** Where not provided satisfactorily by markets • Authorities decide • Authorities « provide » (designation, subsidy)

  20. « LDP » • No relation to « P » : privatisation • Public undertakings still possible • Submitted to the rules of competition • Derogation if SGEI – to the same extent as private firms • No relation to « D » : deregulation • Beforehand : public monopolies • one firm > no need to organise markets • Public ownership > no need for regulation • Now : private firms • Several firms > instruction to board • Private ownership > need for regulation

  21. • Relation to « L » : liberalisation • Suppression of monopolies • Abolition legal barriers to entry • Diminution economic barriers to entry • More firms carrying out activities at market conditions • Need for authorities to determine objectives it wants to pursue in terms of accessibility of service • Universal service • Cqfd : liberalisation => universal service

  22. « The issue of monopoly » • EC Treaty, 86 • « GI » : general interest • « E » : economic • « Conflict of rules » • Internal market, service <= remuneration • Competition, service = economic activity, no remuneration requested

  23. ./. SGIs • Is there a universal service for SIGs : « Services of general (non economic) interest »? • Activities which are not economic in nature • Case law • 1.- Prerogative of sovereignty : police, army • 2.- Solidarity essentiel : social security • These activities are, by nature, governed by the concept of universal service • Available to everyone at reasonable and equal conditions

  24. ./. SGEIs • (a) ECJ • Corbeau, Gl¨ckner • « supplier must provide service to everybody at derogatory conditions » • These derogatory conditions may be financed through monopoly • On the relevant market : « Glöckner », « Afval », social security cases • On adjacent markets : « Corbeau »

  25. (b) regulation • Derogatory conditions, financing ? • Electronic communications • 1.- auction • Least asking undertaking • 2. Subsidy • Public budget or authority administered budget • Extent of subsidy • communication, decision, state aid provisions

  26. • Postal directive • 7, 4.2.

  27. • Compatibility between both ? • Regulated sectors • Designated undertakings may not have an exclusive right • So much the better if other firms provide service without subsidy • Non regulated sectors • Firms may jhave an exclusive right to the extent necessary of conditions 86 EC are fulfilled

More Related