1 / 16

Causes and Consequences of the Stress Response

Causes and Consequences of the Stress Response. HUMANS in NATURE 2010. Stressors and Coping Responses. The organism possesses a remarkable sense of biological priorities

zohar
Télécharger la présentation

Causes and Consequences of the Stress Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Causes and Consequences of the Stress Response HUMANS in NATURE 2010

  2. Stressors and Coping Responses • The organism possesses a remarkable sense of biological priorities • Mechanisms that helped cope with stressors -- fragments of motor patterns and autonomic reflexes -- have been cobbled together by evolution (“bricolage”). • Stressor is a real or perceived challenge to an organism’s ability to meet its real or perceived needs.

  3. Real or perceived NEEDS that must be met: • Physiology( Homeostasis) (Food comes first, then morals. -Bertolt Brecht) • Safety(security, order, protection) • Sociality( acceptance, “acceptance”) • Esteem(better reproductive opportunities status, prestige;) • Self-Actualization(reproduction; direct or indirect fitness; “personal fulfillment”) -apologies to Maslow

  4. Coping . . . • STRESSORS are internal or external changes which by challenging an organism’s ability to meet its needs evokes a coordinated coping response • . . . constrained by a threshold for detectionof the change, for attentionbased on real or perceived relevance, andcapacity to respond at any particular level once the challenge is detected.

  5. COPING RESPONSES: constraints of the system • Input (stress can change the sensitivity of sense organs (e.g., Gandelman 1983); resolve competitive parallel afferent pathways,) • Integration(receptive field modulation; stress can affect arousal, selective attention (e.g., Archer 1973, R.J. Andrew 1972); differential regional sensitivity to hormones or neurotransmitters (e.g., Amy Arnsten 2000); control of microcirculation (e.g., Palmer 1986) • Output (resolve competitive parallel efferent paths to action; energetic reserves and the ability to mobilize them)

  6. COPING RESPONSES: constraints of the system When a challenge to a need is apparent: • the AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM (key in maintaining homeostasis) • Evokes AFFECT (perceived emotion) which ENERGIZES specific MOTIVATIONAL STSTEMS (many external expressions of this … it can be seen in behavior) • REALLOCATES ENERGY to meet the need (internal, if sustained can damage organism)

  7. COPING RESPONSES: stress sensitive hormones • Sympathoadrenomedullary (SAMS) response (adrenal medullary /chromaffin response to sympathetic activation) • Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation(CRF, ACTH, adrenal glucocorticoids) • Opioids(endorphin, enkephalin; affects perception of pain and reproductive axis) • Prolactin (affects reproductive axis) • Angiotensin, Melanotropin?

  8. COPING RESPONSES: problems of interpretation • Bi-phasic (“paradoxical”) responses(responses can be diametrically opposed depending on absolute levels of hormone (e.g., Gandelman 1983) or presence of facilitating hormones (e.g., stress can facilitate classical conditioning [Shors et al. 1992] in males but not in females [Wood & Shors 1998]) • Extra-trophic effects(e.g., CRF canenhances effects of novelty, affect learning,(see Koob 1991); ACTH can suppress aggression (see Brain et al 1971); MSH affects motivation, attention (Stratton & Kastin 1973; Kastin et al. 1971)

  9. COPING RESPONSES: hierarchically arrayed • The most ancient (evolutionarily conservative) responses are invoked first (adrenal medullary /chromaffin response to sympathetic activation) (fear –subcortical limbic areas; pleasure --cortical limbic) • As each response’s adaptive scope is exceeded, successive mechanisms deploy (local, neuroendocrine [CRF, ACTH, glucocorticoids], behavior) • Behavior is the final option (invoked when “lower” responses capacity is exceeded or they would be would be too “expensive”)

  10. THE GENERAL ADAPTATION SYNDROME (GAS): three stages: 1 ALARM REACTION: sudden exposure to stimulus to which organism is not adapted; • Shock phase: initial and immediate (e.g.: tachycardia, loss of muscle tone; decr temp and blood pres) • countershock phase: rebound involving incr adrenal cortical involvement & • relatively rapid SAMS (Sympatho-Adrenomedullary System) response predominates (norepi & epi)

  11. THE GENERAL ADAPTATION SYNDROME (GAS): three stages: 2 STAGE OF RESISTANCE: "organism's full adaptation to the stressor and the consequent improvement or disappearance of symptoms. At this stage, however, there is a concurrent decrease in resistance to most other stimuli.” • the HPA (hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis) response predominates (ACTH and CS) closely interacting with the sympathetic response)

  12. THE GENERAL ADAPTATION SYNDROME (GAS): three stages: 3. STAGE OF EXHAUSTION: coping responses cannot sustain their response if stressor is sufficiently severe and prolonged; • "diseases of adaptation" may arise; • symptoms that disappeared during the stage of resistance may reappear; • death possible.

  13. COPING RESPONSES: not only emergencies ! • Elements of the stress response can be invoked whenever there is a mismatch (unmet expectations, cognitive dissonance; (Goldstein 1990)) • Stressors can be cumulative(acute, sequential, episodic, or sustained stressors all make demands on the system) • The level of response is related to perceived prospects for success (e.g., learned helplessness; active versus passive coping identified with specific columns within the periaquaductal gray (Paradiso et al. 1999))

  14. COPING RESPONSES:delicately balanced alternatives ! • “Fight or flight” (the classic stress alternatives to imminent aggressive threat –not only in animals with a cerebral cortex!) • “Flee or freeze”(lizards can apparently calculate prospects for survival based on external threat , internal resources, and environmental possibilities) • “Green or brown” (the Anolis carolinensis dermal chromatophore –the “chromomotor model”)

  15. SURVEY: stress-sensitive behavior • Detection, Arousal and Attention(steroids affect sensory thresholds, EPI intensifies; acute CS enhances salience) • Activity(CRF facilitates in familiar habitat, inhibits in unfamiliar habitat) • Exploration(CRF and ACTH enhances effects of novelty, CS facilitates) • Learning and memory( EPI, CRF, MSH facilitate acquisition) • Cognition( catecholamine modulation; taking prefrontal cortex “offline” (Arnsten))

  16. SURVEY: stress-sensitive behavior • Feeding( CS stimulates or inhibits depending on circulating levels) • Aggression(ACTH suppresses, CS increases or decreases depending on circulating levels) • Social Dominance(CS increases submissiveness) • Reproduction( ACTH, CS, opiods, and prolactin impair HPG axis) • Dysfunctional behavior(stereotypies, neuroses, psychoses)

More Related