1 / 32

FHWA Status Report - AASHTOWare Bridge Design/Rating User Group Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 6-7, 2013

FHWA Status Report - AASHTOWare Bridge Design/Rating User Group Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 6-7, 2013. Thomas Saad, P.E. Senior Structural Engineer Federal Highway Administration Phone: (708)283-3521. Outline. Design and Analysis Tools LRFR Implementation Webinars

zuri
Télécharger la présentation

FHWA Status Report - AASHTOWare Bridge Design/Rating User Group Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 6-7, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FHWA Status Report -AASHTOWare Bridge Design/Rating User Group MeetingVirginia Beach, VAAugust 6-7, 2013 Thomas Saad, P.E. Senior Structural Engineer Federal Highway Administration Phone: (708)283-3521

  2. Outline • Design and Analysis Tools • LRFR Implementation Webinars • New FHWA Design Manuals and Design Examples • Design and Analysis Training • Research • Long-Term Bridge Performance Program (LTBPP) • Policy and Regulatory Issues • NBIS Update • NBI Coding Guide Update • NTIS • Etc…

  3. Topic No. 1: Implementation of the Load and Resistance Factor Rating Method, October 5, 2011 Topic No. 2: LRFD/LRFR Design and Load Rating of Culverts, November 17, 2011 Topic No. 3: LRFR Load Rating of Segmental Concrete Bridges, January 19, 2012 Topic No. 4: State-Specific LRFR Load Rating Guidelines, April 19, 2012 FHWA LRFR Webinar Series

  4. Topic No. 5: Application of Load Testing in Bridge Load Rating (1), September 20, 2012 Topic No. 6: Application of Load Testing in Bridge Load Rating (2), December 6, 2012 Topic No. 7: Application of Computer Software in Bridge Load Rating (1), February 28, 2013 Topic No. 8: Application of Computer Software in Bridge Load Rating (2), April 25, 2013 FHWA LRFR Webinar Series Recordings: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/lrfd/

  5. LRFR Webinar No. 9: Load Rating of Steel Truss Bridges (1) • September 12, 1:00 – 3:30 pm EDT • Focus on evaluation of gusset plates • New gusset design/analysis provisions • Gusset plate load rating methods case study • Evaluating deteriorated gusset plates • Lubin.gao@dot.gov

  6. Other FHWA Design and Analysis Toolswww.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge • Steel Bridge Design Handbook – Available • Fatigue Repair and Retrofit Manual - Available • Refined Analysis Manual – early 2014 • PT Box Girder Design Manual – early 2014 • FHWA PT Installation and Grouting Manual – release expected very soon • Manual on Engineering Stability in Construction of Bridge Superstructures – early 2014

  7. FHWA/NHI Bridge Design and Analysis Courses (www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov) • NHI Course 130081: LRFD for Bridge Superstructures • NHI Course 132082: LRFD for Bridge Substructures and ERS • NHI Course 130092: LRFR for Highway Bridges • NHI Course 130093: LRFD Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridges • NHI Course 130094: LRFD Seismic Analysis and Design of Tunnels, Walls and other Geotechnical Features • NHI Course 130095: LRFD: Design and Analysis of Skewed and Horizontally Curved Steel Bridges

  8. FHWA Seismic Retrofit Seminar • 1 ½ day seminar (9 PDH) • Overview of FHWA Seismic Retrofit Manual • Develop design response spectrum identically to current LRFD • Delivered in IN, IL, NY, NJ, GA, MA, TN, UT • Thomas.saad@dot.gov

  9. Zone 1-SDC “A” Zone 2-SDC “B” Zone 3-SDC “C” Zone 4-SDC “D” Seismic Design Category (zone)(500 year Return Period)

  10. Zone 1-SDC “A” Zone 2-SDC “B” Zone 3-SDC “C” Zone 4-SDC “D” Seismic Design Category (zone)(1000 Year Return Period) SITE CLASS “B”

  11. Zone 1-SDC “A” Zone 2-SDC “B” Zone 3-SDC “C” Zone 4-SDC “D” Seismic Design Category (zone)(1000 Year Return Period) SITE CLASS “D”

  12. Zone 1-SDC “A” Zone 2-SDC “B” Zone 3-SDC “C” Zone 4-SDC “D” Seismic Design Category (zone)(1000 Year Return Period) SITE CLASS “E”

  13. Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program • Definition of Bridge Performance: Bridge Performance Encompasses How Bridges Function and Behave Under the Complex and Interrelated Factors they are Subjected to Daily: • Method of Design • Construction • Materials • Age • Maintenance History • Traffic Volumes • Loads • De-Icing Chemicals • Freeze-Thaw Cycles • Environment • Extreme Events

  14. Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program • Vision:The LTBP Program will Serve as the National Platform for Strategic Long-Term Investigation of In-Service Bridge Performance. • Mission:Foster Improved Bridge Performance, Health, Stewardship, and Management Through the Analysis of Data Collected Over a 20-Year Period on a Large Representative Sample of U.S. Highway Bridges. To achieve this, the Program is Designed to Produce and Support Improved Deterioration Models, Reliable Life-Cycle Cost and Forecasting Models, Design Procedures, and Decision-Making Tools.

  15. Virginia Bridge Testing Coring USW Impact Echo GPR Electrical Resistivity

  16. Initial East Coast N/S Bridge Corridor

  17. Long Term Bridge Performance Program • “Robot” • Remote controlled • Cameras • GPS • 4 NDE technologies • Deployed on 24 bridges

  18. High-Resolution Imaging USW (Modulus) IE

  19. NBIS Compliance Update • Progress made nationally on 20 of 23 metrics • 1 metric stayed the same at 100% Satisfactory • 2 metrics re‐defined with no comparison available • Significant improvement in 5 metrics • 3 frequency, scour POAs, QC/QA

  20. NBIS Compliance Update • FHWA/AASHTO Task Force in 2011 • Some metrics revised for 2012 assessments • Remainder revised for current cycle • Issued latest version of metrics on 4/1/13 • May training for FHWA staff • Risk considerations, commentary, incorporated Q&As

  21. NBI Data Quality • Trends show results of significant efforts to reduce errors • Error = bad or missing data • > 60 Million pieces of data in NBI

  22. NBIS Video for Local Agencies • Central online library of videos and resources for local agencies • Each video addresses a single topic • condenses complex regulations and requirements of the Federal-aid Highway Program into easy-to-understand concepts and illustrated examples • Launched August 27, 2012 at the American Public Works Association (APWA) International Public Works Congress and Exposition

  23. National Tunnel Inspection Standards (NTIS) • SNPRM published in Federal Register • Comments due by September 30, 2013 • https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/07/30/2013-17875/national-tunnel-inspection-standards#h-4 • TOMIE Manual at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/ • National Tunnel Inventory and Coding Guide being developed

  24. Asset Management System Primer • MAP-21 requires AMS for NHS bridges and pavements • States document how they will do business • State must define performance measures for bridges and pavements • Penalties if performance not met • http://youtu.be/OGiJeUGI4kI

  25. NBIS Regulations Update • Mandated by MAP-21 • Methodology, training, and qualifications for inspectors • Frequency of inspections • Three years to complete (October 2015)

  26. NBIS UpdateRisk-based inspection intervals Is 24 months the right interval for both of these bridges?

  27. NBIS UpdateProcedure for National Certification of Inspectors

  28. NBIS UpdateProcedures for Reporting “Critical Findings” • Relate to structural or safety- related deficiencies of highway bridges • Monitoring activities and corrective actions taken in response to a critical finding

  29. Compliance Oversight and Penalty Procedures • MAP-21 mandates • Procedures for annual compliance reviews • Penalty for noncompliance with the NBIS • Establishes timeframes • States notified of noncompliance concerns by Dec 31st • 45 days to resolve or establish a PCA • Implement penalty if no PCA or resolution • Federal Register Notice being developed

  30. Thank you!

More Related