1 / 20

Social-ecological Hotspots Mapping:

Social-ecological Hotspots Mapping: . An approach to understanding social-ecological space Andy Kliskey Lil Alessa Resilience and Adaptive Management Group University of Alaska Anchorage. Outline. Context - The Anthropocene Existing tools to understand social-ecological systems

baird
Télécharger la présentation

Social-ecological Hotspots Mapping:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social-ecological Hotspots Mapping: An approach to understanding social-ecological space Andy Kliskey Lil Alessa Resilience and Adaptive Management Group University of Alaska Anchorage

  2. Outline • Context - The Anthropocene • Existing tools to understand social-ecological systems • Mapping perceptions – Kenai Peninsula landscape values • Mapping vulnerabilities – Seward Peninsula

  3. The Anthropocene • Currently human activities and/or residence largely occupy Earth • e.g. Ellis & Ramankutty, Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008 • recognizing coupled social-ecological systems . • Such systems must be studied differently than traditional disciplines currently do.

  4. Context • Location, distance, space matters Source: Kliskey & Byrom, 2004, Trans. In GIS

  5. Context • Hotspots as localities of intensity or coincidence

  6. Kenai Peninsula study Source: Alessa, Kliskey, Brown. Landscape & Urban Planning. 2008.

  7. Kenai Peninsula study • Social survey techniques linked to GIS • 561 useable surveys • 23% response rate • Mapping exercise • Where important values are located • Weighting (0-50) of the importance of that value at that location

  8. Landscape values • Aesthetic – areas / places valued for scenery • Biological – valued for plant, animal, wildlife habitat • Cultural – valued as locales for passing down traditional knowledge • Recreation – valued for recreation activities and experiences • Subsistence – valued for provision of food and materials • Economic, Future, Historic, Intrinsic, Learning, Spiritual, Therapeutic, Wilderness

  9. Kenai Peninsula study • Point density mapping • Kernel density

  10. Kenai Peninsula study

  11. Kenai Peninsula study

  12. Kenai Peninsula study

  13. Kenai Peninsula study

  14. Kenai Peninsula study

  15. Kenai Peninsula study

  16. Kenai Peninsula study Key Points • A single space will host a plurality of values, including social ones held by different communities. • Management of natural resources often assumes a standard set of values. • Biophysical measures on their own do not convey enough information to ensure their sustainability over time.

  17. Mapping vulnerability to change • Vulnerability mapping on Seward Peninsula • Community-derived (salmon habitat, permafrost distribution, proximity to streams, traditional use, mining sites) Source: Alessa, Kliskey, et al. Global Environmental Change, 2008.

  18. Existing and Future Directions • Distancing of society from resources Source: Alessa, Kliskey, Williams. Polar Geography, 2007.

  19. Summary • Important role for perceptions of biophysical state (resources) • Need to include the human state • Socio-ecological systems • Need for new approaches toward understanding, representing, and modeling social-ecological space • Acknowledgements: EPSCoR, Alaska SeaGrant, Greg Brown, Sean Mack, Paula Williams

More Related