1 / 9

Charge collection efficiency

Charge collection efficiency. July testbeam period AMS_310B (CiS FE-IB 60Mrad) IZM_Bonn_3 (CiS FE-IB 60Mrad) IZM_F – no signal. AMS-310B, 0 ° , configuration A. 200V. 300V. 400V. 600V. 700V. AMS-310B, 0 ° , configuration B. 200V. 300V. 400V. 600V. 700V.

Télécharger la présentation

Charge collection efficiency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Charge collection efficiency July testbeam period AMS_310B (CiS FE-IB 60Mrad) IZM_Bonn_3 (CiS FE-IB 60Mrad) IZM_F – no signal 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  2. AMS-310B, 0°, configuration A 200V 300V 400V 600V 700V 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  3. AMS-310B, 0°, configuration B 200V 300V 400V 600V 700V 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  4. AMS-310B, 30°, configuration B 200V 300V 400V 600V 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  5. Bonn_3, 0°, configuration A 200V 300V 400V 600V 700V 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  6. Bonn_3, 0°, configuration B 300V 200V 400V 600V 700V 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  7. Bonn_3, 30°, configuration B 200V 300V 600V 400V 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  8. Average charge collected • The average charge collected by Bonn_3 is in all cases 2 Ke less. 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

  9. Conclusion • The average charge collected with increasing bias as expected • The average charge is smaller for angle of 30°, but there was done one measurement with 400V and 10°, giving for this bias the best value (17Ke) • Why is there a hole in the middle of longer dimension? 2.10.2002 PixelWeek, CERN

More Related