1 / 23

From gene expression to metabolic fluxes.

From gene expression to metabolic fluxes. . The problem to be solved (an example). Hauf, J., Zimmermann, F.K., M ü ller, S., 2000. Simultaneous genomic over expression of seven glycolytic enzymes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ezyme. Microbiol. Technol. 26, 688-698.

fergus
Télécharger la présentation

From gene expression to metabolic fluxes.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. From gene expression to metabolic fluxes.

  2. The problem to be solved (an example) Hauf, J., Zimmermann, F.K., Müller, S., 2000. Simultaneous genomic over expression of seven glycolytic enzymes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ezyme. Microbiol. Technol.26, 688-698.

  3. Can we predict fluxes from gene expression data? There is no linear correlation.

  4. Trancriptome and proteome Olivares R, Bordel S, Nielsen J. Codon usage variability determines the correlation between proteome and transcriptome fold changes. BMC Systems Biology. In Press.

  5. Clustering by sequence similarity

  6. Analysis of variance

  7. Results

  8. Statistical description of gene-expression and flux changes The RNA arrays provide measurements for the significance of the expression changes in every gene. We need a method to provide measurements for the significance of flux changes in every reaction. Bordel S, Agren R, Nielsen J. Sampling the Solution Space in Genome-Scale Metabolic Networks Reveals Transcriptional Regulation in Key Enzymes. 2010. PLoSComput. Boil. 6: e1000859

  9. Geometry of the sampling method

  10. Comparison between the Hit and Run algorithm and the sampling of the convex basis. The Hit and Run algorithm seems to underestimate the variance.

  11. Assignment of regulatory characteristics

  12. Some results HXK2

  13. Transcription factor enrichment (very significant for many TFs) Transition from glucose to ethanol or acetate: Gcr1, Gcr2 and Hap4. Glucose-Ethanol 19 enzymes TR, Gcr1 in 11 of them 22 enzymes PR, Gcr1 in none of them Wild type versus grr1∆ and hxk2 ∆ mutants: Pho2 and Bas1: Regulators of purine and histidine biosynthesis. Wild type- grr1∆ 26 enzymes TR, Pho2 in 10 of them 73 enzymes PR, Pho2 in 6 of them Wild type versus mig1∆ mig2∆ mutant: Gcn4 and Cbf1: response against starvation increases growth rate by stimulating amino-acid synthesis and ribosome proliferation

  14. The role of constraints Bordel S, Nielsen J. Identification of flux control in metabolic networks using non-equilibrium thermodynamics. 2010. Metab. Eng. 13, 369-377

  15. How does the cell “choose” its metabolic state? Objective function Set of constraints Metabolic state + ?

  16. Aerobic and oxygen limited chemostats

  17. Anaerobic chemostat and glucose excess batch Vemuri et. al. 2006 Batch fermentation

  18. Thank you for your attention. Questions, suggestions, ideas?

More Related