1 / 44

Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales

Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales. Accelerator R&D for future Linear Colliders (LC) Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez Colin Perry Graduate students: Christina Swinson Ben Constance Robert Apsimon Douglas Bett Alexander Gerbershagen

iwalani-david
Télécharger la présentation

Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales • Accelerator R&D for future • Linear Colliders (LC) • Philip Burrows • Glenn Christian • Hamid Dabiri Khah • Javier Resta Lopez • Colin Perry • Graduate students: • Christina Swinson • Ben Constance • Robert Apsimon • Douglas Bett • Alexander Gerbershagen • CERN, DESY, KEK, SLAC P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  2. Group activities • ILC Global Design Effort: • Design of beam-based feedback systems in linacs and • Beam Delivery System • Design of Machine-Detector Interface • Design/prototyping of IP beam feedback system • ATF2 project at KEK: produce/stabilise beam at nm level •  ILC Technical Design Report in 2012 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  3. Group activities • ILC Global Design Effort: • Design of beam-based feedback systems in linacs and • Beam Delivery System • Design of Machine-Detector Interface • Design/prototyping of IP beam feedback system • ATF2 project at KEK: produce/stabilise beam at nm level •  ILC Technical Design Report in 2012 • CLIC: • All of the above • Drive-beam phase stability feed-forward system •  CLIC CDR in 2010, TDR in 2015? • Beam dynamics, mechanical design, electronic engineering P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  4. Beam-based feedbacks for LCs • ILC luminosity goal 10**34 / cm**2 / s • Miniscule beams: 5nm (y) x 500nm (x) at IP • Making and colliding such beams not easy! • 3000 / 1500 bunches, spacing 150 / 300ns •  DIGITAL FB approach P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  5. Beam-based feedbacks for LCs • ILC luminosity goal 10**34 / cm**2 / s • Miniscule beams: 5nm (y) x 500nm (x) at IP • Making and colliding such beams not easy! • 3000 / 1500 bunches, spacing 150 / 300ns •  DIGITAL FB approach • CLIC luminosity goal 10**35 / cm**2 / s • bunches even smaller (< 1nm) • c. 200 bunches, spacing c. 0.5ns •  ANALOGUE FB approach P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  6. IP beam-based feedback for LC e+ e- P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  7. IP beam-based feedback for LC Ground vibrations cause beams to miss one another e+ e- P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  8. IP beam-based feedback for LC Ground vibrations cause beams to miss one another e+ e- Outgoing beams deflected P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  9. IP beam-based feedback for LC Ground vibrations cause beams to miss one another e+ e- Outgoing beams deflected Measure beam position P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  10. IP beam-based feedback for LC Ground vibrations cause beams to miss one another e+ Feedback circuit e- Outgoing beams deflected Measure beam position P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  11. IP beam-based feedback for LC Kick beam back into collision Ground vibrations cause beams to miss one another e+ Feedback circuit e- Outgoing beams deflected ‘Intra-train’ FB Measure beam position P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  12. ILC Interaction Region c. 2009 (SiD for illustration) - Oriunno Reacting bars QD0 Cam/support QF Spool tubes Opening 2 m on the beam P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  13. CLIC_ILD Detector Concept: Forward Region Version 3 Nov. 2009 (by André Sailer) ECal end-cap HCal end-cap Yoke end-cap (partial) LumiCal BeamCal QD0 (partial) P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  14. FONT4/5 prototypes at KEK/ATF2 Kicker BPM 1 BPM 2 BPM 3 e- 1.3 GeV Drive amplifier Analogue BPM processor 3 bunches, 140-154ns spacing Digital feedback P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  15. FONT4 prototype at KEK/ATF Kicker BPM 1 BPM 2 BPM 3 e- Drive amplifier Analogue BPM processor Digital feedback P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  16. BPM processor 2007 2005 2006 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  17. Digital Feedback Board JTAG port PROM Xilinx Virtex4 FPGA 40 MHz oscillator GP I/O Header Analog Devices ADC/DACs RS232 comms 2 x Analog Output channels (differential) 4 x General-purpose digital outputs 2 x Analog Input channels (single-ended) 3 x external clock/trigger inputs P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  18. Kicker driver amplifier • Specifications: • +- 15A (kicker terminated with 50 Ohm) • +- 30A (kicker shorted at far end) • 35ns risetime (to 90%) • pulse length 10 us (specified for 20-60 bunches) • repetition rate 10 Hz • Outline design done in Oxford • CASE studentship w TMD Technologies • Order placed with TMD Sept 06 • Two prototype units delivered Dec 06 • 2 units in service at KEK since 2007 • (2009: upgrades made + 1 unit) P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  19. FONT status • FONT4 basic operation demonstrated in 2008 running: • beam feedback along single axis (y) with few micron resolution P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  20. FONT status • FONT4 basic operation demonstrated in 2008 running: • beam feedback along single axis (y) with few micron resolution P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  21. FONT operations in 2009 • FONT4 installation was dismantled when ATF extraction line was reconfigured late 2008 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  22. ATF2 FB system • Dedicated • system: • 2 stripline • kickers + • fast drive amplifiers • 3 stripline BPMs + • fast analogue front-end electronics • 9-channel digital FB processor P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  23. ATF2 FB system • Dedicated • system: • 2 stripline • kickers + • fast drive amplifiers • 3 stripline BPMs + • fast analogue front-end electronics • 9-channel digital FB processor P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  24. ATF2 FB system • Dedicated • system: • 2 stripline • kickers + • fast drive amplifiers • 3 stripline BPMs + • fast analogue front-end electronics • 9-channel digital FB processor P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  25. FONT operations in 2009 • FONT4 installation was dismantled when ATF extraction line was reconfigured late 2008 • 3 new BPMs and 2 new kickers installed in new ATF2 extraction line week of February 9 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  26. New FONT ATF2 hardware P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  27. FONT: Jan-May 2009 • FONT4 installation was dismantled when ATF extraction line was reconfigured late 2008 • 3 new BPMs and 2 new kickers installed in new ATF2 extraction line week of February 9 • Main aims: • 1) commission new BPMs and kickers (digital DAQ) • 2) work on improved resolution  1 um level • 3) understand beam dynamics in FONT region • Much commissioning work done parasitically - now have FONT ‘standalone’ hardware • We typically took 1 shift per week March - May, a total of 6 shifts (!) P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  28. Example: BPM calibrations P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  29. Example: kicker calibration Kick of 40 urad 6

  30. Example: resolution vs. bunch Q P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  31. FONT since June 2009 • New FONT5 9-channel FB/FF board (y, y’) assembled (Sept. 2009): • bench tested in Oxford (October) • sent to KEK (November) for beam tests • shipped back and repaired (1 week turnaround) • undergoing further beam tests P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  32. FONT since June 2009 • New FONT5 9-channel FB/FF board (y, y’) assembled (Sept. 2009): • bench tested in Oxford (October) • sent to KEK (November) for beam tests • shipped back and repaired (1 week turnaround) • undergoing further beam tests • Replace the LO-based BPM processor • with a ‘baseband’ scheme: preliminary design; first tests early 2010 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  33. Valencia Mover P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  34. ILC IP intra-train FB performance P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  35. CLIC IP intra-train FB performance angle scan position scan using luminosity signal IP position FB marginal luminosity gain from scans (?) P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  36. FONT plans: 2010-11 • Provide ‘turn-key’ bunch-by-bunch FB system for • achievement of ATF2 goals: • 35 nm beam spot • stabilisation at nanometer level at IP • VITAL DEMONSTRATION OF FINAL-FOCUS CAPABILITY FOR ANY FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER! • Contribute FB system design to CLIC CDR P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  37. FONT plans: 2011-12 • FB tests using a long ILC-like train of 20-60 bunches at ATF2 • (FONT4 amplifier was specified to allow this) • Would allow us to investigate algorithm robustness: • account for bunch-bunch correlations along train • adaptive gain as beam conditions change (drift) • incorporate feed-forward information from upstream • fast (luminosity) scanning system? P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  38. FONT plans: 2012-13 • Contribute FB system design, including relevant aspects of the machine-detector interface, to ILC TDR • CLIC: prototyping of drive beam phase stability feed-forward system; beam tests at CTF3 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  39. FONT plans > 2013 • Depends on STFC funding situation, • and on international developments for LC! • Ongoing simulations of luminosity performance of ILC + CLIC machines • Design of feedback and feed-forward systems • Phase stability feed-forward for CLIC drive beam • (CLIC TDR 2015?) P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  40. Other opportunities • UK New Light Source (NLS): • will require high quality beam trajectory control through VUV-FEL undulator • Beam control in proton / ion accelerators for hadron therapy P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  41. Resources • Faculty: Philip Burrows • Project staff: • RA (Christian, Resta Lopez) 2.0 • Electronic engineer (Perry) 1.0 • LCABD current grant (up to April 2011) • JAI grant (up to April 2012) • ZERO on PP RG • Accelerator science student: C. Swinson • Quota students: B Constance, R Apsimon, D Bett • CERN doctoral student: A. Gerbershagen P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  42. STFC response 13/7/09 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  43. STFC response 13/7/09 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

  44. STFC response 13/7/09 P.N. Burrows Project Review, Oxford, 11/12/09

More Related