1 / 20

Successful PPP models for road infrastructure

Successful PPP models for road infrastructure. Various Models in different countries. Prof. Dr. Markus Schmidt. 28.03.2011. Agenda. General aspects of PPP. 1. German success with A-Models. 2. International success with V-Models. 3. Conclusion. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Agenda.

kasie
Télécharger la présentation

Successful PPP models for road infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Successful PPP models for road infrastructure Various Models in different countries Prof. Dr. Markus Schmidt 28.03.2011

  2. Agenda General aspects of PPP 1 German success with A-Models 2 International success with V-Models 3 Conclusion 4 5 6 7 8

  3. Agenda General aspects of PPP 1 German success with A-Models 2 International success with V-Models 3 Conclusion 4 5 6 7 8

  4. General aspects of PPPFundamental components Planning Building Development of a optimal concept concerning completion of demand, operating costs, after use and marketing Private commercial achievement of building works enabled the optimization from costs, time and quality through free placing of companies and negotiation Operating Financing Transfer of management and operation, concentration of the public administration on their core competence, realisation from synergy benefits Relief from public budgets by private financing and funding through fees and charges

  5. General aspects of PPPOrganisation chart Authorities as lisencer (awarding authority) Associates as investor external finance SPV Project company as concession holder (operator) Credit argeement Partnership agreement Contracts with subcontractors about the completion of service planning construction maintenance

  6. Agenda General aspects of PPP 1 German success with A-Models 2 International success with V-Models 3 Conclusion 4 5 6 7 8

  7. German success with A-ModelsModel description • Derivatedfrom: Autobahnausbaumodell (Highway extention model) • Buildingof additional lanes, maintenanceandoperationof all lanesas well asfinancing all measuresto private businesscompanies • The operatingcompanyachievesduesfromthetruckroadchargeforthishighwaysection

  8. German success with A-ModelsTruck road charge system Road chargebridgeaspartofthechargesystem: „Toll Collect“

  9. German success with A-ModelsOverview assignedconcessions currentbidding expectedbidding (2011-2012)

  10. German success with A-ModelsCase study • A8 Munich - Augsburg • Project data: • 52km operation route • 37km extension route, widen 4 lanes to 6 lanes • 54 passages and undergrade crossings • 7 bridge constructions • Project costs: • Building costs: > 150 m € • Operate-, maintenance-, financing costs: > 500 m €

  11. Agenda General aspects of PPP 1 German success with A-Models 2 International success with V-Models 3 Conclusion 4 5 6 7 8

  12. International success with V-ModelsCase study (V-Model = Availability Model) • M51 Kliplev – Sonderborg (Denmark): • 26 km new road-construction • 69 engineering constructions • 3 high span bridges • Project data: • Building costs: > 100 m € • Operate-, maintenance-, financing costs : > n.a. m € • 30 years operation and maintenance • Service payments from government for availability of infrastructure

  13. International success with V-ModelsCase study (V-Model = Availability Model) • E18 Koskenkylä–Kotkamotorway (Finland) • 53 km newroad-construction • 27 km improvementofroads (e.g. convertingtwo-lanehighwaytomotorway) • 87 km constructionoftraffictelematics • Service: • 15 – 20 yearsmaintenanceandoperation • Service paymentsfromgovernmentforavailabilityofinfrastructure

  14. Agenda General aspects of PPP 1 German success with A-Models 2 International success with V-Models 3 Conclusion 4 5 6 7 8

  15. ConclusionExamination of different models • PPP models are a good alternative for the realization of infrastructure projects • The A-model, the V-model and the other models are successful PPP models for road infrastructure in Germany and in Europe • The models must be adapted to each country and to each situation • Drees & Sommer is advising the German ministry of transport in terms of • creating new PPP models in Germany • Important steps: • 1. Understand boundary conditions • 2. Select the right model type • 3. Create and execute the project

  16. Discussion Thankyouforyourattention! Questions?

  17. Any Queries? We will assist you! Drees & Sommer Infra Consult und Entwicklungsmanagement GmbH Dr. Jürgen Laukemper Str. Lt. Av. Serban Petrescu Nr. 15, Et.2 011891 Bucuresti (Sector 1) / Romania phone +40 31 690-8001 juergen.laukemper@dreso.com Drees & Sommer Infra Consult und Entwicklungsmanagement GmbH Prof. Dr. Markus Schmidt Str. Lt. Av. Serban Petrescu Nr. 15, Et.2 011891 Bucuresti (Sector 1) / Romania phone +40 31 690-8001 markus.schmidt@dreso.com

  18. www.dreso.com

  19. Backup

  20. ConclusionEfficiency drivers and success factors of PPP Appropriate distribution of risks between private sector and public authority • Risk transfer from public authority to private sector • Basic principle: everyone bears the risk he can influence best Life-Cycle-Management of the project • Without this: during planning and building, operation and maintenance is not considered • Interaction between planning, building, maintenance and operation taken into account Output specification of the service • Giving the benefit to the private company of specialisation and efficiency advantages • Not describing the input of the service but the output Performance-oriented payment • Bonus – malus systems due to availability of the service • Direct connection output specification and risk distribution

More Related