1 / 26

Transfers, Capital, and Consumption over the Demographic Transition: An International Comparison

Transfers, Capital, and Consumption over the Demographic Transition: An International Comparison. Andrew Mason University of Hawaii at Manoa Ronald Lee University of California. Acknowledgements. Support – National Institutes of Health NIA R01 AG025488 and AG025247

knell
Télécharger la présentation

Transfers, Capital, and Consumption over the Demographic Transition: An International Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transfers, Capital, and Consumption over the Demographic Transition: An International Comparison Andrew Mason University of Hawaii at Manoa Ronald Lee University of California

  2. Acknowledgements • Support – National Institutes of Health NIA R01 AG025488 and AG025247 • Computational work – Diana Wongkaren, Turro Wongkaren, Pablo Lattes, Tim Miller, and Gretchen Stockmayer

  3. Key Ideas • Demographic transition is from high youth dependency to high old age dependency. • During the transition, low dependency yields the first demographic dividend. • Children and the elderly are similar in that neither work; however, • Elderly contribute to economic growth by accumulating assets. • This will lead to a second dividend.

  4. Objective of Paper • Use a simulation model that incorporates detailed empirical data to analyze how • the demographic transition • the importance of family support systems • public policy • features of the economic life cycle • Influence asset demand, economic growth, and consumption

  5. Theoretical Model • Economic lifecycle dictates that adults support children and accumulate pension wealth • Children are supported through a combination of public and familial transfers • Pension wealth comes in two exhaustive, mutually exclusive forms • Pension transfer wealth (from younger and future generations) • Assets • Composition of pension wealth is determined by policy

  6. Theoretical Model • In the conventional lifecycle model, consumption at each age reflects tastes and individualistic lifetime budget constraint • In this model, consumption at each age is governed by altruism across generations and general standards of living

  7. Theoretical Model • Closed form solution for the steady-state • Dynamics • Solve for steady-state in 2300 • Use backward recursion to solve for the paths of assets, consumption, and other macroeconomic variables • Work on a forward recursion solution is underway

  8. Data • UN Population Data • 1950-2050: World Pop Prospects 2005 • 2050-2300: World Pop to 2300 • Economic lifecycle • Japan: Ogawa and Matsakura (2005) • South Korea: An and Gim (2006) • Thailand: Chawla (2006) • US and Taiwan: Lee, Lee, & Mason (2005)

  9. Limitations of Current Analysis • Methodology for simulating dynamic results requires further testing and evaluation. • Model does not incorporate important feedbacks • Small open economy • Accumulation of assets does not lead to changes in interest rates or changes in labor productivity • In future work this will be a key feature of the analysis

  10. Analysis of Economic Lifecycles and Steady States • Asset demand is increased by • Fertility decline • Increased life expectancy • More rapid economic growth • Lower interest rates • US type economic life cycle with high old age consumption • Early retirement • See paper for detailed calculations

  11. Components of Lifecycle Wealth

  12. Transfer policy Pension policy: Public transfers to children:

  13. Simulations

  14. Key Points • For young populations, simulated assets and pension wealth are negative • Costs of children exceed resources of parents • Three possible outcomes • Accumulate foreign debt to finance child costs • Reduce spending on children below the relative level estimated for Taiwan in 1977 or the US in 2000 • Rely exclusively on transfer wealth to support old-age consumption

  15. Key Points • Fertility decline leads to greater wealth (huge differences in Tk/Y across countries in the plots) • Rise in support ratio leads to increased per capita consumption at all ages and greater accumulation for retirement • Aging of adult population  more wealth • If fertility decline leads to a rise in spending on children relative to adults • Assets will increase by less • Human capital may rise by more (video games or education?)

  16. Key Points • Increased longevity and population aging lead to greater wealth • In US, ratio of assets to labor income increases • Doubles between 1950 and 1970 • Doubles again between 1990 and 2090 • In Brazil, ratio of assets to labor income increases by about 500% between 1950 and 2000

  17. Key Points • Effects on consumption are quite modest • Small open economy assumption; no capital deepening effects, but large international capital flows and spill-overs to other countries • In a closed economy, a doubling of K/Y raises labor income and consumption by 40%, so we expect much bigger effects in fuller model. • Global aging will produce similar effects on a global scale.

  18. In Conclusion • If aging leads exclusively to expanded public and familial transfer programs, economy is a fixed pie divided among more consumers. • If transfer programs are kept in check, aging leads to greater assets, a larger pie, and a second demographic dividend.

  19. In Conclusion • Does not mean that consumption will rise relative to productivity, but that it will decline by less than the decline in the support ratio. • Consumption is lower per year of life, but lifetime consumption is higher

More Related