1 / 15

Currents and Sediment Transport in the Mississippi Canyon and Effects of Hurricane Georges

Currents and Sediment Transport in the Mississippi Canyon and Effects of Hurricane Georges. Mary Jo Richardson Wilford Gardner Cheryl Burden Vernon Asper. Thanks for inviting us to HCMR. Mary Jo Richardson (Texas A&M University) Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University - Fulbright Fellow).

melita
Télécharger la présentation

Currents and Sediment Transport in the Mississippi Canyon and Effects of Hurricane Georges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Currents and Sediment Transport in the Mississippi Canyon and Effects of Hurricane Georges Mary Jo Richardson Wilford Gardner Cheryl Burden Vernon Asper

  2. Thanks for inviting us to HCMR • Mary Jo Richardson (Texas A&M University) • Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University - Fulbright Fellow)

  3. Currents, temperature and particulate matter concentration • May - July 1998 • Aug - Nov 1998 • Current meters, thermographs, light-scattering sensor, sediment traps, cores, ROV video camera

  4. Canyons • Conduits of sediment to deep water • Oscillatory currents - internal waves • Storm events - hurricanes • Winter storm cooled - Mediterranean

  5. Mississippi Canyon station locations and bathymetry. Contoursare in 100 m intervals. A. The upper portion of the map shows station locations from the 1998 cruise, including core, LAPS/ROV and mooring locations. B. The lower portion of the map shows station locations from the 1994 cruise. Transect lines and LAPS stations are numbered. Inset shows the study area in relation to the Louisiana coastline and Mississippi River Delta.

  6. Configuration of instrument mooring.

  7. Back-scattered light (measured from the LSS) vs. particulate matterconcentration (PM) for the May 1998 cruise. All data are included; no division was made between surface and deeper water.

  8. Temperatures at 33 and 3.5 mab for deployment 1 and B) deployment 2.

  9. Vertical displacement of 50 m 2C change - saw tooth pattern • Up/down-canyon flow, bed shear stress, particle concentration, and temperature for days 172-181 at the canyon axis mooring site. Current velocity and temperature scales are reversed to match up/down-canyon flow. Deployment 1. • Up/down-canyon flow, cross-canyon flow, bed shear stress, and temperature for days 270-279 at the canyon axis mooring site. Current velocity and temperature scales are reversed to match up/down-canyon flow. Deployment 2.

  10. Progressive vector plot of currents at 3.5 mab during the first mooring deployment. Net transport is mostly cross-canyon (South) at 50 mab and down-canyon at 3.5 mab (East) with a cross-canyon drift. X's denote midnight.

  11. Progressive vector plot of currents at 3.5 mab during the second mooring deployment. Net transport is down canyon (East). X's denote midnight. The passage of Hurricane Georges is denoted in year days. Note unequal axes that also differ from the unequal axes of Figure 8.

  12. Conclusions • Currents oscillated with diurnal periodicity • Currents exceeded critical bed shear stress 30% (normal) 50% (hurricane) • Sediment trap collection increased 70-130 X during hurricane • Trap fluxes better related to input from nearby rivers and resuspended sediment more than current strength, compared with other canyons

  13. Special thanks to Aris (for inviting us) and Victoria (for sharing her office)

More Related