1 / 29

Governing Board Accreditation Presentation

Governing Board Accreditation Presentation. Presenters: Accreditation Oversight Committee Co-Chairs Ron Vess, Library Department Chair Mink Stavenga, Dean of Instructional Support Services. April 28, 2010. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation. Accreditation Oversight Committee (AOC)

nuwa
Télécharger la présentation

Governing Board Accreditation Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation Presenters: Accreditation Oversight Committee Co-Chairs Ron Vess, Library Department Chair Mink Stavenga, Dean of Instructional Support Services April 28, 2010

  2. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation Accreditation Oversight Committee (AOC) Mission: Oversight and coordination of Southwestern College’s ongoing accreditation process development and review of responses to ACCJC recommendations and action plans. Vision: Achieve ongoing reaffirmation of Accreditation

  3. Accreditation Oversight Committee Recommendation, Communication, and Approval Process Governing Board President’s Cabinet Shared Consultation Council Accreditation Oversight Committee Work Groups

  4. Work Group One • Co-Leads: • Viara Giraffe, Lisa Ballesteros, Alexis Davidson • Recommendation One: Mission Statement Systematically and regularly evaluate and update the mission statement; use it to guide institutional goals. Due Date: March 15, 2011

  5. WG1: Update • Researching mission statements of other colleges that have been reaffirmed • Include key elements that were common at other institutions • Recommend a process for periodically reviewing the mission statement • Recommend language for a possible mission statement and send out for consultation

  6. Work Group Two • Co-Leads: • Valerie Goodwin-Colbert, Angelica Suarez, Kathy Tyner • Recommendation Two: Integrated Planning Establish and implement a comprehensive planning process that assures improvement in student learning, integrate various college plans; informed by quantitative and qualitative data and analysis, assess outcomes. Due Date: March 15, 2011

  7. WG2 Update: • Identifying various planning processes • Exploring models that provide process integration • Identifying individual SWC plans for integration • Developing a process for regularly evaluating and updating the Strategic Plan • Identified the need to interface with Work Group 1: College Mission Statement and Work Group 3: Institutional Program Review

  8. Work Group Three • Co-Leads: • Veronica Burton, Ron Vess, Patti Larkin, Angelica Suarez • Recommendation Three: Institutional Program Review Improve Program Review; integrate evidence based student learning outcomes; assure that it occurs at regular intervals; sufficient for college planning and allocation of resources; develop and implement a program discontinuance policy. Due Date: March 15, 2011

  9. WG3 Update: • Developing process for re-introducing Achieving Institutional Mission (AIM) to the campus community • Committee is creating a new Universal Program Review Plan for AIM • Discussion on developing and implementing AIM procedures • Entered into discussion with representatives from WG2 on Program Reviews role in strategic planning • Explored concept of a day-long retreat to begin process for integrated planning for all work groups

  10. Work Group Four • Co-Leads: • Mark Meadows, Aaron Starck, Margie Stinson • Recommendation Four: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Identify SLOs for all courses, programs, learning and support services; Identify AUOs for non-instructional areas; using data and analysis to assess achievement; use assessment results for improvement. Due Date: Achieve developmental level by March 15, 2011 • Progress towards Proficiency by Fall 2012.

  11. WG4 Update: • Identified need for ongoing SLO Coordinator position • Creation of Job Description: Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment: Academic & Student Affairs • Reviewed by Pre-Cabinet and Academic Senate • Requesting 60% release time • Entering already created SLOs into CurricUNET system

  12. WG4 Update: (continued) • Creating SLO webpage for college website • SLO Assessment Pilot Group has been created • VPAA will provide training to academic deans/directors on AUOs this summer • PT Research Analyst working with SLO Coordinator, Margie Stinson • Action Plan has been developed to Meet Proficiency in SLOs

  13. Work Group Five • Co-Leads: • Eva Hedger, Mink Stavenga • Recommendation Five: Substantive Change Proposal for Distance Education Submit Substantive Change report for programs that currently offer more than 50% of a degree or certificate program through Distance Education. Due Date: October 15, 2011

  14. WG Five Update: • Completed Substantive Change Proposal (SCP) • SCP submitted to WASC for pre-submission review • WASC edits received • Work Group 5 incorporates suggestions into SCP • SCP will be submitted for June Commission Meeting Action

  15. Work Group Six • Co-Leads: • Nicholas Alioto, Terry Davis, Tom Luibel • Recommendation Six: Develop and Implement Technology Plan Develop a plan for integrating Technology Plan with the College Strategic Plan which, among other things, will address a reliable budgeting process for renewing technology and for providing appropriate technology staffing, support, and training college wide. Due Date: October 15, 2010

  16. WG6 Update: • Met to review and discuss Accreditation Team Evaluation Report • Governing Board approved funding for consultants to develop Technology Plan • Teleconference scheduled with consultants developing Technology Plan

  17. Work Group Seven • Co-Leads: • Randy Beach, Bruce MacNintch, Diana Kelly • Recommendation Seven: Professional Development Plan and conduct Professional Development activities to meet personnel needs; implement a formal evaluation process of the activities. Due Date: Self Study 2015

  18. WG7 Update: • Bi-monthly Work Group meeting schedule established • Hired Staff Development Coordinator, Diana Kelly • Needs Assessment Surveys conducted • Current planning based on Needs Assessment results • Proposal has been presented to address augmenting the Staff Development Budget to accommodate campus needs • Developed an outline for a Comprehensive Staff Development Planning Process

  19. Work Group Eight • Co-Leads: • Diane Gustafson, Michele Fenlon, Michael Kerns • Recommendation Eight: Fostering an Environment of Trust and Respect Foster respectful relationships to promote administrative stability; establish and follow a written process to promote shared governance by allowing all constituencies a substantial voice in decision making. Due Date: Show progress by October 15, 2010; Complete by March 15, 2011.

  20. WG8 A: Update • Committee has developed 27 recommendations • 12 recommendations have been approved by AOC and Shared Consultation Council (SCC) • The remainder will be taken through facilitated dialogue for assistance with implementation • A Campus Climate Survey similar to the 2003 study has been prepared and is ready to be launched shortly

  21. WG8 B: Update • Recommend revision of District Policy #2510: Participation in Local Decision Making • Recommend revision of District Procedures to accompany Policy 2510 for Faculty and Staff • Recommend new District Policy on the Role and Scope of the Academic Senate 10+1 agreement

  22. WG8 B: Update (continued) • Recommend new District Procedure for the role and scope of the Academic Senate 10+1 agreement • The above Policies and Procedures are currently in the consultation process with each respective constituency

  23. Work Group Nine • Co-Leads: • Ron Vess, Bruce MacNintch, Mink Stavenga • Recommendation Nine: Role of the Governing Board Act as college advocate; adhere to role as policy making body; act as a whole to support decisions made. Due Date: October 15, 2010

  24. WG9 Update: • Budget Task Force composition no longer includes Governing Board representation • Recommend elimination of Policy #2432: Selection of Vice Presidents (scheduled for May Governing Board meeting) • Scheduled CCLC Workshop on Governing Board Roles and Responsibilities • Governing Board approvedrevised language for District Policy #6100: Delegation of Authority (Business and Financial Affairs)

  25. Work Group Ten • Co-Leads: • Ron Vess, Bruce MacNintch, Mink Stavenga • Recommendation Ten: Governing Board Procedures Establish and implement a formal procedure to handle conflict of interest and ethics policy; document adherence. Due Date: October 15, 2010

  26. WG10 Update: • Developing recommended Procedure language for District Policy #2715: Code of Ethics • Developing recommended Procedure language for District Policy #2710: Conflict of Interest

  27. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation April 2010 Thank you for your time and attention to this important endeavor. For more information please contact: Mink Stavenga, Dean of Instructional Support Services and Accreditation Liaison Officer mstavenga@swccd.edu or 619-482-6542

More Related