1 / 19

Governing Board Accreditation Presentation

Governing Board Accreditation Presentation. Presenters: Accreditation Oversight Committee Co-Chairs. Ron Vess, Library Department Chair Mink Stavenga, Dean of Instructional Support Services. March 1, 2010. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation.

vashon
Télécharger la présentation

Governing Board Accreditation Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation Presenters: Accreditation Oversight Committee Co-Chairs Ron Vess, Library Department Chair Mink Stavenga, Dean of Instructional Support Services March 1, 2010

  2. Governing Board Accreditation Presentation Accreditation Oversight Committee (AOC) Mission: Oversight and coordination of Southwestern College’s ongoing accreditation process development and review of responses to ACCJC recommendations and action plans. Vision: Achieve ongoing reaffirmation of Accreditation The AOC received sub-committee approval from the Shared Consultation Council on February 17, 2010.

  3. Operating Principles: • AOC will review and approve recommendations from Work Groups. All work group progress reports will be presented to the Shared Consultation Council during their monthly meetings. • Following the shared governance model, all recommendations requiring constituency review will be forwarded for consultation. • A quorum was established for voting to include 50% +1. Approval requires 2/3 majority of members present.

  4. Timeline

  5. Timeline

  6. Accreditation Oversight Committee Composition • Nicholas Alioto, Vice President for Business and Financial Affairs • Randy Beach, Council of Chairs • Veronica Burton, Articulation and Program Review • Cidhinnia M. Torres Campos, Dean of Research, Evaluation, and Planning • Valerie Goodwin-Colbert, Academic Senate President • Alexis Davidson, Tenure Review Coordinator • Terry Davis, Dean Health, Exercise Science, and Athletics; Administrators Association • Michele Fenlon, CSEA representative; Accreditation Resource Co-Chairs: Ron Vess, Department Chair; Library Faculty Mink Stavenga, Dean, Instructional Support Services; Accreditation Liaison Officer The Accreditation Oversight committee is inclusive of all constituencies and models shared governance.

  7. Accreditation Oversight Committee Composition • Diane Gustafson, Library Faculty • Phil Lopez, SCEA President • Michael Kerns, Vice President for Human Resources • Bruce MacNintch, CSEA President • Mia McClellan, Dean Student Services • Mark Meadows, Vice President for Academic Affairs • Kimberlie Rader, Confidential Representative • Marsha Rutter, Adjunct Faculty Representative • Gilbert Songalia, Associated Student Organization • Margie Stinson, Student Learning Outcomes Coordinator • Angelina E. Stuart, Academic Senate Vice President • Angelica Suarez, Vice President for Student Affairs • Kathy Tyner, Dean Mathematics, Science and Engineering

  8. Work Group One Co-Leads: Viara Giraffe and Lisa Ballesteros • Recommendation One: Mission Statement Systematically and regularly evaluate and update the mission statement; use it to guide institutional decision and improvement goals. • End Goals: Update Mission statement • Progress: Researching mission statements from other colleges; specifically those who were required to update as a WASC recommendation. • Due Date: March 2011

  9. Work Group Two Co-Leads: Valerie Goodwin-Colbert, Angelica Suarez, Kathy Tyner • Recommendation Two: Integrated Planning Establish and implement a comprehensive planning process that assures improvement in student learning; integrate various college plans; informed by quantitative and qualitative data and analysis; assess outcomes. • End Goals: Develop integrated planning model that moves through the Shared Consultation Council, Cabinet, and eventually Governing Board if required. • Progress: Weekly meeting schedule established. Researching other college models. • Due Date: March 15, 2011

  10. Work Group Three Co-Leads: Veronica Burton, Ron Vess, Patty Larkin • Recommendation Three: Institutional Program Review Improve Program Review; integrate evidence based student learning outcomes; occurs at regular intervals; sufficient for college planning and allocation of resources; develop and implement a program discontinuance policy. • End Goals: Restructure Program Review process; include Institutional, Student Services, and Academic Program Reviews under same umbrella • Progress: Weekly meeting schedule established, Dr. Suarez, and Dr. Torres Campos have been identified as work group resources to ensure integration of related work groups. • Due Date: March 15, 2011

  11. Work Group Four Co-Leads: Cidhinnia M. Torres Campos, Mark Meadows, Margie Stinson • Recommendation Four: Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s) and Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUO’s) Identify SLO’s for all courses, programs, learning and support services; Identify AUO’s for non-instructional areas; using data and analysis to assess achievement; use assessment results for improvement. • End Goals: Achieve proficiency level according to WASC Rubric • Progress: Recommendation is being developed to dedicate increased resources to SLO/AUO activities. Completing course SLO’s • Due Date: Achieve developmental level on ACCJC Rubric by March 15, 2011; Progress towards Proficiency Level on ACCJC Rubric, Fall 2012.

  12. Work Group Five Co-Leads: Eva Hedger, Mink Stavenga • Recommendation Five: Substantive Change Proposal for Distance Education Submit Substantive Change report for programs that currently offer more than 50% of a degree or certificate program through Distance Education. • End Goals: Prepare and submit Substantive Change Proposal • Progress: Proposal completed; distributing to constituencies; expect to submit for May ACCJC action • Due Date: October 15, 2010

  13. Work Group Six Co-Leads: Nicholas Alioto, Terry Davis, Tom Luibel • Recommendation Six: Develop and Implement Technology Plan Develop a plan for integrating Technology Plan with the College Strategic Plan which, among other things, will address a reliable budgeting process for renewing technology and for providing appropriate technology staffing, support, and training college wide. • End Goals: Create and implement a reliable budgeting process for renewing technology; working closely with Work Group 2 to address overlap and integration • Progress: First meeting this week • Due Date: October 15, 2010

  14. Work Group Seven Co-Leads: Randy Beach, Bruce MacNintch, Diana Kelly • Recommendation Seven: Professional Development Plan and develop Professional Development activities to meet personnel needs; implement formal process for evaluation of activities. • End Goals: Create professional development opportunities for all staff and evaluate success. • Progress: Classified Survey distributed • Due Date: Self Study 2015

  15. Work Group Eight Co-Leads: Diane Gustafson, Michele Fenlon, Michael Kerns • Recommendation Eight: Fostering an environment of trust and respect. Foster respectful relationships to promote administrative stability; establish and follow a written process; promote shared governance by allowing all constituencies a substantial voice in decision making. • End Goals: Develop and implement plan to improve campus climate and collegial interactions. • Progress: Recommendations are currently being developed. Campus Climate Survey being developed. • Due Date: Show progress by October 15, 2010; Complete by March 15,2011.

  16. Work Group Nine Co-Leads: Ron Vess, Mink Stavenga, Bruce MacNintch • Recommendation Nine: Role of the Governing Board Act as college advocate; adhere to role as policy making body; act as a whole to support decisions made. • End Goals: Demonstrate resolution of the above recommendation. • Progress: Governing Board presentation, March 1, 2010 • Due Date: October 15, 2010

  17. Work Group Ten Co-Leads: Ron Vess, Mink Stavenga, Bruce MacNintch • Recommendation Ten: Governing Board Procedures Establish and implement a formal procedure to handle conflict of interest and ethics policy; document adherence. • End Goals: Demonstrate resolution of the above recommendation. • Progress: Governing Board presentation, March 1, 2010 • Due Date: October 15, 2010

  18. Governing BoardAccreditation Presentation Thank you for your time and attention to this important endeavor. For more information please contact: Mink Stavenga, Dean of Instructional Support Services and Accreditation Liaison Officer 619-482-6542 or mstavenga@swccd.edu

More Related