'Ranking process' diaporamas de présentation

Community Review Process Ranker Training Indianapolis CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee

blueprint 2.0 Making homelessness rare, short-lived and recoverable. Community Review Process Ranker Training Indianapolis CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee. CoC Program Application & Technical Assistance Committee. Erica Aquila City of Indianapolis Janna Bruce

384 views • 23 slides

279 views • 18 slides

NAPA Experiences

First thoughts for the ECBI Workshop Naivasha, 28-30 September 2006 Balgis Osman Elasha Tom Downing. NAPA Experiences. The process. Interviews with NAPA teams Questionnaire Review of draft and final NAPA documents Expert dialogues. Interview with NAPA teams. Issues discussed

238 views • 13 slides

New Chair: Jennifer McMillan, BLM-Lands Vice Chair: KT Pyne , DOF

http://www.frames.gov/partner-sites/afsc/home/. New Chair: Jennifer McMillan, BLM-Lands Vice Chair: KT Pyne , DOF. Ranking process Do Research Topics Address Direct Management Needs? Address Basic Data Gaps? Benefit to Multiple Agencies? Ranking points: High=3, Moderate=2, Low=1.

96 views • 9 slides