1 / 17

LandWarNet 2008

UNCLASSIFIED. . PURPOSE: discuss the core functions of EMSO: spectrum management, frequency assignment, host nation coordination, and policy enforcement; the S6/G6 role and responsibilities for EMSO; the overlap between electronic warfare and EMSO; and actions underway to build EMSO capability for t

sef
Télécharger la présentation

LandWarNet 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. LandWarNet 2008

    2. PURPOSE: discuss the core functions of EMSO: spectrum management, frequency assignment, host nation coordination, and policy enforcement; the S6/G6 role and responsibilities for EMSO; the overlap between electronic warfare and EMSO; and actions underway to build EMSO capability for tactical operations. OBJECTIVES: By the end of this presentation you will be able to: (List of take-aways from this session) Discuss the four major domains within Army, tactical ElectromMagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) Discuss how EMSO support to communications fits with EMSO support for Electronic Warfare (EW), air defense, radar, UAVs, and other categories of radio systems in the operational environment Discuss the S6/G6 role and responsibilities for tactical EMSO operations Discuss the way forward to transform and modernize EMSO capabilities to meet the operational requirements of ground force operations NETCOM’s vision looks to the future and projects where our command intends to be in 8-10 years – operating with in a fully Joint, network centric environment --- we have much to do to achieve this vision Our mission statement directs an immediate focus on what we do everyday to enable battle command – actions ISO wartime operations, training and readiness as well as our operational base, NetOps and enterprise core competencies. (Walk through each of the five functions // indicating further discussion on each in the brief) Our expeditionary forces are transforming to align with the Army’s BCT construct ---- rapidly deployable communications capabilities and highly trained warfighting Signal Soldiers The operational base provides the Step, Teleport, Fixed Regional Hub Nodes (FRHN), Area Processing Centers (APCs) and other capabilities that enable reach-back within and between the various theaters for tactical and non-tactical communication support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Our Enterprise Capabilities represent the business processes and technologies that enable us to operate globally Network Operations is how we operationally assure Global Decision Superiority and interface with the Joint environment Executive Agent and Special Missions are critical, no-fail missions in support of the National Command Authority and DoD that we have been specifically missioned to provide ISO the Joint and Army Warfighter – they are integral to our ability to extend the network as well as providing critical C2 capabilities to the NCANETCOM’s vision looks to the future and projects where our command intends to be in 8-10 years – operating with in a fully Joint, network centric environment --- we have much to do to achieve this vision Our mission statement directs an immediate focus on what we do everyday to enable battle command – actions ISO wartime operations, training and readiness as well as our operational base, NetOps and enterprise core competencies. (Walk through each of the five functions // indicating further discussion on each in the brief) Our expeditionary forces are transforming to align with the Army’s BCT construct ---- rapidly deployable communications capabilities and highly trained warfighting Signal Soldiers The operational base provides the Step, Teleport, Fixed Regional Hub Nodes (FRHN), Area Processing Centers (APCs) and other capabilities that enable reach-back within and between the various theaters for tactical and non-tactical communication support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Our Enterprise Capabilities represent the business processes and technologies that enable us to operate globally Network Operations is how we operationally assure Global Decision Superiority and interface with the Joint environment Executive Agent and Special Missions are critical, no-fail missions in support of the National Command Authority and DoD that we have been specifically missioned to provide ISO the Joint and Army Warfighter – they are integral to our ability to extend the network as well as providing critical C2 capabilities to the NCA

    3. This should be the first slide of your session brief LandWarNet 2008

    4. Lessons learned from Iraq and Afghanistan have identified significant frequency interference issues EW systems have exacerbated an already complex and oversaturated Electromagnetic Operational Environment Accelerated modernization increases the challenge to the execution of efficient spectrum operations EM Spectrum Operations involves more than EW and Communication systems Electromagnetic Spectrum Management is a validated Tier 1 capability gap. Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Environment: Shared by all emitters in the EM Operational Environment--Radio Frequencies near term focus; Lasers and Infrared in the long term Must be operationally managed as efficiently as ammo, rations, etc. Aerial layer presents unique challenges Enables Network Centric Warfare EM Spectrum Operations (EMSO) J6/G6/S6 responsibility: Must deconflict frequencies for all operational requirements Visibility of EW frequency plan required in order to deconflict frequency assignments Governed by DOD, National and International Policy Nations have sovereign rights to spectrumLessons learned from Iraq and Afghanistan have identified significant frequency interference issues EW systems have exacerbated an already complex and oversaturated Electromagnetic Operational Environment Accelerated modernization increases the challenge to the execution of efficient spectrum operations EM Spectrum Operations involves more than EW and Communication systems Electromagnetic Spectrum Management is a validated Tier 1 capability gap. Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Environment: Shared by all emitters in the EM Operational Environment--Radio Frequencies near term focus; Lasers and Infrared in the long term Must be operationally managed as efficiently as ammo, rations, etc. Aerial layer presents unique challenges Enables Network Centric Warfare EM Spectrum Operations (EMSO) J6/G6/S6 responsibility: Must deconflict frequencies for all operational requirements Visibility of EW frequency plan required in order to deconflict frequency assignments Governed by DOD, National and International Policy Nations have sovereign rights to spectrum

    5. Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Spectrum Management traditionally done by D9 spectrum managers with a focus on frequency assignments for Comm networks only. It was considered a part of the Network Management portion of NetOps. Net Centric Warfare requires access to the Electromagnetic Spectrum Battlespace (EMSB). Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) enables the warfighter’s use the EMSB. All emitters to include satellite, navigation systems, sensors, radars, munitions, Air Defense/IRR, UAS/UGS, and EW systems are all users of the RF Spectrum. Their spectrum requirements require intensive management to ensure that they are de-conflicted prior to issuing a frequency assignment. Each nation has sovereign rights to their spectrum. Host nation coordination takes place prior to deconflicting frequencies and making the frequency assignment. Spectrum use is governed by DOD, National, and International policy. The introduction of CREW systems has introduced another degree of complexity to Spectrum Operations. They are user owned and operated which presents a challenge as to how we employ them to protect our soldiers while not interfering with other Blue systems. Coordination between the EWO and the G6/S6 must be constant and may require a dedicated Spectrum Operations NCO (25E) to perform this mission. We must clearly define the EW and Spectrum Operations lanes to effectively use access to the spectrum as a combat multiplier. Spectrum Management traditionally done by D9 spectrum managers with a focus on frequency assignments for Comm networks only. It was considered a part of the Network Management portion of NetOps. Net Centric Warfare requires access to the Electromagnetic Spectrum Battlespace (EMSB). Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) enables the warfighter’s use the EMSB. All emitters to include satellite, navigation systems, sensors, radars, munitions, Air Defense/IRR, UAS/UGS, and EW systems are all users of the RF Spectrum. Their spectrum requirements require intensive management to ensure that they are de-conflicted prior to issuing a frequency assignment. Each nation has sovereign rights to their spectrum. Host nation coordination takes place prior to deconflicting frequencies and making the frequency assignment. Spectrum use is governed by DOD, National, and International policy. The introduction of CREW systems has introduced another degree of complexity to Spectrum Operations. They are user owned and operated which presents a challenge as to how we employ them to protect our soldiers while not interfering with other Blue systems. Coordination between the EWO and the G6/S6 must be constant and may require a dedicated Spectrum Operations NCO (25E) to perform this mission. We must clearly define the EW and Spectrum Operations lanes to effectively use access to the spectrum as a combat multiplier.

    6. Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Spectrum Management traditionally done by D9 spectrum managers with a focus on frequency assignments for Comm networks only. It was considered a part of the Network Management portion of NetOps. Net Centric Warfare requires access to the Electromagnetic Spectrum Battlespace (EMSB). Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) enables the warfighter’s use the EMSB. All emitters to include satellite, navigation systems, sensors, radars, munitions, Air Defense/IRR, UAS/UGS, and EW systems are all users of the RF Spectrum. Their spectrum requirements require intensive management to ensure that they are de-conflicted prior to issuing a frequency assignment. Each nation has sovereign rights to their spectrum. Host nation coordination takes place prior to deconflicting frequencies and making the frequency assignment. Spectrum use is governed by DOD, National, and International policy. The introduction of CREW systems has introduced another degree of complexity to Spectrum Operations. They are user owned and operated which presents a challenge as to how we employ them to protect our soldiers while not interfering with other Blue systems. Coordination between the EWO and the G6/S6 must be constant and may require a dedicated Spectrum Operations NCO (25E) to perform this mission. We must clearly define the EW and Spectrum Operations lanes to effectively use access to the spectrum as a combat multiplier. Spectrum Management traditionally done by D9 spectrum managers with a focus on frequency assignments for Comm networks only. It was considered a part of the Network Management portion of NetOps. Net Centric Warfare requires access to the Electromagnetic Spectrum Battlespace (EMSB). Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) enables the warfighter’s use the EMSB. All emitters to include satellite, navigation systems, sensors, radars, munitions, Air Defense/IRR, UAS/UGS, and EW systems are all users of the RF Spectrum. Their spectrum requirements require intensive management to ensure that they are de-conflicted prior to issuing a frequency assignment. Each nation has sovereign rights to their spectrum. Host nation coordination takes place prior to deconflicting frequencies and making the frequency assignment. Spectrum use is governed by DOD, National, and International policy. The introduction of CREW systems has introduced another degree of complexity to Spectrum Operations. They are user owned and operated which presents a challenge as to how we employ them to protect our soldiers while not interfering with other Blue systems. Coordination between the EWO and the G6/S6 must be constant and may require a dedicated Spectrum Operations NCO (25E) to perform this mission. We must clearly define the EW and Spectrum Operations lanes to effectively use access to the spectrum as a combat multiplier.

    7. Current NETOPS Doctrine

    8. Current NETOPS Doctrine

    9. EMSO and NETOPS

    12. Spectrum Congestion

    13. BDE EM Spectrum Operations

    14. Tactical EM Spectrum Operations Spectrum XXI: Is used to create frequency allotments that are later used in a frequency assignment tools. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/spectrum_xxi.html ACES/JACS (Automated Communications Engineering Software/Joint Automated CEOI System): used to manage Combat Net Radio; generates SINCGARS hopset; create, edit, and generate the CEOI/SOI. NPT/DPEM (Network Planning Terminal/detailed Planning and Engineering Module): 1 set of network planning algorithms, coded in 2 different software packages (same functionality); one of the functions is planning the frequencies for terrestrial, army Signal Corps, line of site radio links. It simultaneously plans frequencies for multiple links for all Signal Corps line-of-sight links in a network. Has many planning functions other than frequency assignment. The algorithms maximize frequency reuse by attempting to use previously used frequencies before resorting to using unassigned spectrum. SPEED (Systems Planning, Engineering, and Evaluation Device): The US Marine Corps counterpart to the aforementioned NPT/DPEM. There is significant functionality overlap between SPPED and NPT/DPEM, and SPEED is a better tools for some functions. The Marines do not have the larger number of line-of-sight radio links that an Army formation has, and SPEED cannot perform simultaneous frequency planning for networks; it plans frequencies one at a time. AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program): a surface Navy spectrum management software tool for managing radar and communications frequencies of shipboard equipment. http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/05_apr/web_pages/XML.htm EMSO (ElectroManetic Spectrum Operations): Under the Army construct for EMSO, the Army describes ACES/JACS, NPT/DPEM, SPEED, and AESOP as comms planning tools that include a frequency assignment capability. Spectrum XXI is the only current ‘system’ that supports spectrum management. Spectrum XXI is not a program of record with life cycle support from an acquisition Program Manager. It is a DISA program sponsored by the Joint Spectrum Center. Life cycle support is an ongoing issue for end users.Spectrum XXI: Is used to create frequency allotments that are later used in a frequency assignment tools. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/spectrum_xxi.html ACES/JACS (Automated Communications Engineering Software/Joint Automated CEOI System): used to manage Combat Net Radio; generates SINCGARS hopset; create, edit, and generate the CEOI/SOI. NPT/DPEM (Network Planning Terminal/detailed Planning and Engineering Module): 1 set of network planning algorithms, coded in 2 different software packages (same functionality); one of the functions is planning the frequencies for terrestrial, army Signal Corps, line of site radio links. It simultaneously plans frequencies for multiple links for all Signal Corps line-of-sight links in a network. Has many planning functions other than frequency assignment. The algorithms maximize frequency reuse by attempting to use previously used frequencies before resorting to using unassigned spectrum. SPEED (Systems Planning, Engineering, and Evaluation Device): The US Marine Corps counterpart to the aforementioned NPT/DPEM. There is significant functionality overlap between SPPED and NPT/DPEM, and SPEED is a better tools for some functions. The Marines do not have the larger number of line-of-sight radio links that an Army formation has, and SPEED cannot perform simultaneous frequency planning for networks; it plans frequencies one at a time. AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program): a surface Navy spectrum management software tool for managing radar and communications frequencies of shipboard equipment. http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/05_apr/web_pages/XML.htm EMSO (ElectroManetic Spectrum Operations): Under the Army construct for EMSO, the Army describes ACES/JACS, NPT/DPEM, SPEED, and AESOP as comms planning tools that include a frequency assignment capability. Spectrum XXI is the only current ‘system’ that supports spectrum management. Spectrum XXI is not a program of record with life cycle support from an acquisition Program Manager. It is a DISA program sponsored by the Joint Spectrum Center. Life cycle support is an ongoing issue for end users.

    15. Tactical EM Spectrum Operations Spectrum XXI: Is used to create frequency allotments that are later used in a frequency assignment tools. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/spectrum_xxi.html ACES/JACS (Automated Communications Engineering Software/Joint Automated CEOI System): used to manage Combat Net Radio; generates SINCGARS hopset; create, edit, and generate the CEOI/SOI. NPT/DPEM (Network Planning Terminal/detailed Planning and Engineering Module): 1 set of network planning algorithms, coded in 2 different software packages (same functionality); one of the functions is planning the frequencies for terrestrial, army Signal Corps, line of site radio links. It simultaneously plans frequencies for multiple links for all Signal Corps line-of-sight links in a network. Has many planning functions other than frequency assignment. The algorithms maximize frequency reuse by attempting to use previously used frequencies before resorting to using unassigned spectrum. SPEED (Systems Planning, Engineering, and Evaluation Device): The US Marine Corps counterpart to the aforementioned NPT/DPEM. There is significant functionality overlap between SPPED and NPT/DPEM, and SPEED is a better tools for some functions. The Marines do not have the larger number of line-of-sight radio links that an Army formation has, and SPEED cannot perform simultaneous frequency planning for networks; it plans frequencies one at a time. AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program): a surface Navy spectrum management software tool for managing radar and communications frequencies of shipboard equipment. http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/05_apr/web_pages/XML.htm EMSO (ElectroManetic Spectrum Operations): Under the Army construct for EMSO, the Army describes ACES/JACS, NPT/DPEM, SPEED, and AESOP as comms planning tools that include a frequency assignment capability. Spectrum XXI is the only current ‘system’ that supports spectrum management. Spectrum XXI is not a program of record with life cycle support from an acquisition Program Manager. It is a DISA program sponsored by the Joint Spectrum Center. Life cycle support is an ongoing issue for end users.Spectrum XXI: Is used to create frequency allotments that are later used in a frequency assignment tools. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/spectrum_xxi.html ACES/JACS (Automated Communications Engineering Software/Joint Automated CEOI System): used to manage Combat Net Radio; generates SINCGARS hopset; create, edit, and generate the CEOI/SOI. NPT/DPEM (Network Planning Terminal/detailed Planning and Engineering Module): 1 set of network planning algorithms, coded in 2 different software packages (same functionality); one of the functions is planning the frequencies for terrestrial, army Signal Corps, line of site radio links. It simultaneously plans frequencies for multiple links for all Signal Corps line-of-sight links in a network. Has many planning functions other than frequency assignment. The algorithms maximize frequency reuse by attempting to use previously used frequencies before resorting to using unassigned spectrum. SPEED (Systems Planning, Engineering, and Evaluation Device): The US Marine Corps counterpart to the aforementioned NPT/DPEM. There is significant functionality overlap between SPPED and NPT/DPEM, and SPEED is a better tools for some functions. The Marines do not have the larger number of line-of-sight radio links that an Army formation has, and SPEED cannot perform simultaneous frequency planning for networks; it plans frequencies one at a time. AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program): a surface Navy spectrum management software tool for managing radar and communications frequencies of shipboard equipment. http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/05_apr/web_pages/XML.htm EMSO (ElectroManetic Spectrum Operations): Under the Army construct for EMSO, the Army describes ACES/JACS, NPT/DPEM, SPEED, and AESOP as comms planning tools that include a frequency assignment capability. Spectrum XXI is the only current ‘system’ that supports spectrum management. Spectrum XXI is not a program of record with life cycle support from an acquisition Program Manager. It is a DISA program sponsored by the Joint Spectrum Center. Life cycle support is an ongoing issue for end users.

    16. Tactical EM Spectrum Operations Spectrum XXI: Is used to create frequency allotments that are later used in a frequency assignment tools. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/spectrum_xxi.html ACES/JACS (Automated Communications Engineering Software/Joint Automated CEOI System): used to manage Combat Net Radio; generates SINCGARS hopset; create, edit, and generate the CEOI/SOI. NPT/DPEM (Network Planning Terminal/detailed Planning and Engineering Module): 1 set of network planning algorithms, coded in 2 different software packages (same functionality); one of the functions is planning the frequencies for terrestrial, army Signal Corps, line of site radio links. It simultaneously plans frequencies for multiple links for all Signal Corps line-of-sight links in a network. Has many planning functions other than frequency assignment. The algorithms maximize frequency reuse by attempting to use previously used frequencies before resorting to using unassigned spectrum. SPEED (Systems Planning, Engineering, and Evaluation Device): The US Marine Corps counterpart to the aforementioned NPT/DPEM. There is significant functionality overlap between SPPED and NPT/DPEM, and SPEED is a better tools for some functions. The Marines do not have the larger number of line-of-sight radio links that an Army formation has, and SPEED cannot perform simultaneous frequency planning for networks; it plans frequencies one at a time. AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program): a surface Navy spectrum management software tool for managing radar and communications frequencies of shipboard equipment. http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/05_apr/web_pages/XML.htm EMSO (ElectroManetic Spectrum Operations): Under the Army construct for EMSO, the Army describes ACES/JACS, NPT/DPEM, SPEED, and AESOP as comms planning tools that include a frequency assignment capability. Spectrum XXI is the only current ‘system’ that supports spectrum management. Spectrum XXI is not a program of record with life cycle support from an acquisition Program Manager. It is a DISA program sponsored by the Joint Spectrum Center. Life cycle support is an ongoing issue for end users.Spectrum XXI: Is used to create frequency allotments that are later used in a frequency assignment tools. http://www.disa.mil/jsc/spectrum_xxi.html ACES/JACS (Automated Communications Engineering Software/Joint Automated CEOI System): used to manage Combat Net Radio; generates SINCGARS hopset; create, edit, and generate the CEOI/SOI. NPT/DPEM (Network Planning Terminal/detailed Planning and Engineering Module): 1 set of network planning algorithms, coded in 2 different software packages (same functionality); one of the functions is planning the frequencies for terrestrial, army Signal Corps, line of site radio links. It simultaneously plans frequencies for multiple links for all Signal Corps line-of-sight links in a network. Has many planning functions other than frequency assignment. The algorithms maximize frequency reuse by attempting to use previously used frequencies before resorting to using unassigned spectrum. SPEED (Systems Planning, Engineering, and Evaluation Device): The US Marine Corps counterpart to the aforementioned NPT/DPEM. There is significant functionality overlap between SPPED and NPT/DPEM, and SPEED is a better tools for some functions. The Marines do not have the larger number of line-of-sight radio links that an Army formation has, and SPEED cannot perform simultaneous frequency planning for networks; it plans frequencies one at a time. AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program): a surface Navy spectrum management software tool for managing radar and communications frequencies of shipboard equipment. http://www.chips.navy.mil/archives/05_apr/web_pages/XML.htm EMSO (ElectroManetic Spectrum Operations): Under the Army construct for EMSO, the Army describes ACES/JACS, NPT/DPEM, SPEED, and AESOP as comms planning tools that include a frequency assignment capability. Spectrum XXI is the only current ‘system’ that supports spectrum management. Spectrum XXI is not a program of record with life cycle support from an acquisition Program Manager. It is a DISA program sponsored by the Joint Spectrum Center. Life cycle support is an ongoing issue for end users.

    17. Identify Required EMSO Capability Gaps

    18. Questions?

More Related