1 / 14

Structure for Advisory Committee

JOINT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH CARE FACILITIES. Structure for Advisory Committee. Background. MISSION AND DUTIES The joint advisory committee shall—

sheperd
Télécharger la présentation

Structure for Advisory Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. JOINT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH CARE FACILITIES Structure for Advisory Committee

  2. Background • MISSION AND DUTIES • The joint advisory committee shall— • assess specific communications capabilities and needs of emergency medical and public health care facilities, including the improvement of basic voice, data, and broadband capabilities; • assess options to accommodate growth of basic and emerging communications services used by emergency medical and public health care facilities; • assess options to improve integration of communications systems used by emergency medical and public health care facilities with existing or future emergency communications networks; and • report its findings to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce, within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act. (February 4, 2008)

  3. Advisory Committee Organization Advisory Committee (25 Representatives) Chair Project Management Group Emergency Medical Public Health Technology Integration Group

  4. Project Management GroupGroup Lead: JAC Chair • Ensure Working Groups work in a manner consistent with statutory objectives. • Establish major timelines and deliverables and assign to Working Groups. • Assign necessary resources to coordinate with other Working Groups. • Understand viewpoints of each reporting Working Group and mediate issues. • Report to Advisory Committee Chair on issues and progress. • Deliver draft report to Advisory Committee.

  5. Emergency Medical GroupGroup Lead: Chair and Vice Chair • Identify the communications needs and requirements of emergency medical users • Review proposals by other work groups as it relates to the needs of emergency medical users. • Key deliverables: • Statement of Requirements (SoR) • Use cases

  6. Emergency Medical Group • Kevin McGinnis – ChairNational Association of State EMS Officials • Drew DawsonNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationUnited States Department of Transportation • Steven J. DelahouseyEmergency Medical Services Corporation • R. Shawn RogersOklahoma State Department of Health • Karen H. Sexton, R.N.The University of Texas Medical Branch • Carl VanCottNorth Carolina Office of Emergency Medical Services • John S. WilgisFlorida Hospital Association • Christopher K. Wuerker, MDWashington Hospital Center

  7. Technology Integration GroupGroup Lead: Chair and Vice Chair • Assess specific communications capabilities of emergency medical and public health care facilities • Assess need for improvement of basic voice, data, and broadband capabilities; • Assess options to accommodate growth of basic and emerging communications services used by emergency medical and public health care facilities; • Assess options to improve integration of communications systems used by emergency medical and public health care facilities with existing or future emergency communications networks

  8. Technology Integration Group • Mike Roskind – ChairOffice of Cybersecurity and Communications National Protection and Programs Directorate - United States Department of Homeland Security • John F. Adams, Jr.Raytheon Company • Curtis M. BashfordGeneral Devices • James A. CorryMobile Satellite Ventures, L.P. • Col. Terry J. EbbertOffice of Homeland Security and Public Safety - City of New Orleans • John F. NagelAmerican Messaging Services, Inc. • Ted O’Brien Iridium Satellite L.L.C. • Donna Bethea-Murphy *secondary*Iridium Satellite L.L.C. • Jim TraficantHarris Corporation

  9. Public Health GroupGroup Lead: Chair and Vice Chair • Identify the communications needs and requirements of public health care facilities. • Identify issues for consideration or action by other work groups. • Review proposals by other work groups as it relates to the needs of public health care facilities. • Key deliverables: • Statement of Requirements (SoR) • Use cases

  10. Public Health Group • Jonathan Linkous – ChairAmerican Telemedicine Association • Michael J. Ackerman, Ph.D.National Library of Medicine - NIH/U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Serv. • Eric K. GriffinLee County Office of Emergency Management • Lisa Kaplowitz, M.D.Virginia Department of Health • Richard LiekwegUniversity of California, San Diego, Medical Center • Thomas S. Nesbitt, MDUniversity of California, Davis, Health System • Virginia M. Pressler, MDHawaii Pacific Health • Murad RaheemOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response United States Department of Health and Human Services

  11. Phase I • 3-4 week timeline (Oct 30th – Nov 21st) • Input from Emergency Medical and Public Health Groups • Needs & Requirements • Technology Integration Group • Identifies capabilities • Basic: Voice & Data • Emerging: Broadband Data • Perform Gap Analysis between Emergency Medical & Public Health Groups needs & requirements and technology capability

  12. Phase II • 5-7 week timeline (Nov 26th – Jan 8th) • Input from Emergency Medical & Public Health Groups • Projected Needs & Requirements • Anticipated growth • Technology Integration Group • Identifies future capabilities • Basic: Voice & Data • Emerging: Broadband Data • Perform Gap Analysis between Emergency Medical & Public Health Groups projected needs & requirements and future technology capability • Also identify how to accommodate growth

  13. Phase III • 3 week timeline (Jan 8th – Jan 25th) • Final Drafting of Report to Congress • Initial draft report developed by the Project Management Group • Working Groups develop “change requests” to the initial draft report and reviewed by project management team • Weekly cycle • Folded into the document upon agreement • Sent back to the working group if not agreement • Deliver draft report to Committee members • Draft of the report are voted on by the Advisory Committee members • Adopted Report Submitted to Congress

  14. Draft Report Development Process Initial Draft Developed Project Management Group Submit to Working Groups Technology Integration & Interoperability Group Public Health Emergency Medical Develop & Review Change Requests Submit to Working Groups Next Draft Developed & Voted Project Management Group

More Related