1 / 17

The observational dataset most RT’s are waiting for: the WP5.1 daily high-resolution gridded datasets

HadGHCND – daily Tmax Caesar et al., 2001. GPCC - monthly precipitation Rudolf, 2005. MARS – daily Tmin Genovese, 2001. The observational dataset most RT’s are waiting for: the WP5.1 daily high-resolution gridded datasets. Why?.

tamesis
Télécharger la présentation

The observational dataset most RT’s are waiting for: the WP5.1 daily high-resolution gridded datasets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HadGHCND – daily Tmax Caesar et al., 2001 GPCC - monthly precipitation Rudolf, 2005 MARS – daily Tmin Genovese, 2001 The observational dataset most RT’s are waiting for:the WP5.1 daily high-resolution gridded datasets

  2. Why? …developing dailyhigh-resolution gridded observational datasets for Europe? • Evaluation of the ENSEMBLES simulation/prediction system • Scenario construction • Impact assessment • Analysis of climate extremes

  3. Project partners • KNMI, Lisette Klok & Albert Klein Tank • MeteoSwiss, Evelyn Zenklusen & Michael Begert • University of East Anglia, Malcolm Haylock & Phil Jones • University of Oxford, Nynke Hofstra & Mark New

  4. Overview • Variables and grid • Stations and series • Homogeneity • Interpolation • Data availability

  5. Variables and grid • daily observations • Tmax, Tmin, Tmean, RR, mslp, snow depth • regular 0.25 degree grid and/or an equal area grid • 1960-2004 or present Domain

  6. ECA&D coverage 2004 Station locations Data sources: • ECA&D • EMULATE • STARDEX • GSN • GHCN - daily • MAP project • MARS 2033 stations

  7. Series • 1831 precipitation • 1384 Tmax • 1388 Tmin • 1244 Tmean • 317 mslp • 180 snow depth • quality controlled • updated with SYNOP data

  8. Homogeneity – results of the absolute test following the method of Wijngaard et al., 2004

  9. Vera-QC (Begert et al., in preparation) Only complete series Period: 1960-2000 Number of break-points detected: 0() 1() 2() 3() >4() undefined () mean temperature precipitation Homogeneity – results of the relative test

  10. Homogeneity – results of the relative test

  11. Homogeneity – results of the relative test [°C] [°C] [°C] Frequency distribution of shift dimensions for temperature

  12. Interpolation methods • Natural Neighbour Interpolation • Angular Distance Weighting • Thin Plate Splines • Kriging • Conditional Interpolation (only rainfall)

  13. Selection of best method and validation • Cross validation • Remove one station and interpolate to location of that station • Compare results with observed values and calculate skill scores (e.g. RMSE, LEPS) • Comparison with grids from high resolution station series • E.g. UK 5*5 km rainfall, Switzerland rainfall and Norway • Compare results with gridded datasets and calculate skill scores

  14. Interpolation results LEPS skill scores averaged across all methods

  15. Uncertainties in the interpolation results • Still looking for appropriate method to determine uncertainties • Will be in the form of uncertainty bands around the interpolated value • Different uncertainty bands for every grid for every day

  16. Data availability • Gridded datasets (September 2007): http://www.ensembles-eu.org/ >> RT5 site • Daily station series (if public!): http://eca.knmi.nl

More Related