1 / 38

Soos Creek Elementary

Soos Creek Elementary. 2011-2012 Successfully Prepare All Students For Their Future. Superstar Learners Think about our choices Account for our actions Respect others Succeed in school. S.T.A.R.S. MSP Results. State of the “School” . Adequate Yearly Progress: Analysis. Analysis:

tatum
Télécharger la présentation

Soos Creek Elementary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Soos Creek Elementary 2011-2012 Successfully Prepare All Students For Their Future

  2. Superstar Learners Think about our choices Account for our actions Respect others Succeed in school S.T.A.R.S

  3. MSP Results State of the “School”

  4. Adequate Yearly Progress: Analysis • Analysis: • 08-09 Did not meet AYP in SpEd Reading/Math & Black Reading • 09-10 Met AYP in SpEd Reading & Math via Safe Harbor, Met AYP in Black Reading • 09-10 Did not meet AYP in Reading ALL and Reading Low Income • 10-11 Did not meet AYP in Black Reading • 10-11 Met AYP in Black Math via 3 year average • * Special Ed N< Required

  5. AYPStrategy w/Evidence of Impact • Strategy w/ Evidence of Impact: • CAST Trimester –– Reading focus • Increased accountability for teachers/IP students in Gen Ed classes (30-60-90, Differentiation • Block schedule with emphasis on IP and interventions • SIOP III, IV, V • Next Steps: • SIOP – Continued Professional Development • Pathways – Updated Professional Development, Monitored usage • CAST/Collaboration • PLC training, meetings, and RESULTS • Continue block intervention schedule • 30-60-90 & SIP – drafted by staff based on assessment data • SIT 9 Characteristics of High Performing Schools, data analysis and progress monitoring • Student trajectories – monitored via SIT & PLC

  6. MSP Strategy w/Evidence of Impact • Strategy w/ Evidence of Impact: • CAST • Increased Collaboration between specialists and GenEd • Increased use of data to inform instruction • Next Steps: • 30-60-90 • SIP • Pathways • PLCs • Parent Involvement & Training • Title & LAP • Block Schedule • Intervention Schedule • Trajectories with increase progress monitoring

  7. WASL/MSP Reading Analysis • Analysis: • SC outscored KSD in 4th and 5th grade • 3rd grade – 3 year growth trend • Strategy w/ Evidence of Impact: • Rigorous curriculum and expectations • Differentiation in class and via interventionists • Progress monitoring (more frequent for Tier 2 & 3) • Data sheets • Instruction aligned with standards

  8. WASL/MSP Analysis - Math • Analysis: • 4th grade consistently outscores KSD • 3rd grade biggest drop • Math scores consistently lower than reading scores • Next Steps: • PLC focus on Fidelity of implementation of math ( • Pathways – continued training, access, and usage • Progress monitoring; School City, KSD unit, Math Ex. • PLC trainings, meetings and results • 30-60-90 & SIP – • SIT 9 Characteristics of High Performing Schools, data analysis and progress monitoring

  9. WASL/MSP Writing • Analysis: • 3 year trend – right around 60% • Soos Creek outscored KSD all 3 years • Strategy w/ Evidence of Impact: • Rigorous curriculum and expectations (Units of Study, The Write Source, Writing Conferences) • Writer’s Workshop taught by experienced teachers

  10. Student Enrollment 434 Source: October 1 counts Decrease in enrollment likely due to the change in economic demographics, houses on market.

  11. Demographics: Analysis • Analysis: • Enrollment continues to decrease • ELL numbers fairly consistent • SpEd has decreased – but 2011 – 2012 may see slight increase • F/R has doubledin 7 years • Title I status as of 2010-2011 • Money used to hire certificated Intervention Specialists

  12. Demographics:Next Steps • Alignment: • Staff Development: (Cultural Proficiency, teaching students in poverty, SIOP) • Assessment • Curriculum – Standards • Professional Learning Communities centered on data at the student level • 1st/2nd grade split configuration • 5th/6th grade looping • Staff training • Continued Tiered Intervention (RtI trained 2010-2011) • Frequent Monitoring of data and student progress • Flexible learning groups • SIP & 30-60-90 – Increased progress monitoring & accountability • Parent Involvement • Math and Reading Nights • WaKids

  13. Enrollment by Ethnicity Source: October 1 P223 Report

  14. Ethnicity: Analysis • Analysis: • White largest demographic (minority/majority) • Asian demographic continues to increase • Black demographic relatively consistent • Hispanic/Latino demographic decreased each year • Multiracial now 0% (?), likely represented in “Not Provided” • Data accuracy questionable due to reporting process

  15. Ethnicity Strategy w/Evidence of Impact • Strategy w/ Evidence of Impact: • Cultural Proficiency training – Data Coach • Star community activities – Soos Creek community • Multicultural Night – Consistently highly attended • Next Steps: • Continued cultural proficiency professional development • Continued SIOP training

  16. SC: Grades 3 & 4 Reading and MathEconomic Status

  17. SC: Grades 5 & 6 Reading and MathEconomic Status

  18. Discipline Data • Analysis: • Tracked by grade, student, teacher, location • One student skews results • 1 Bullying incident documented, climate survey suggests more • Next Steps: • Increased principal support at the classroom level • Positive Behavior committee revisits Schoolwide systems • Increased recognition for preferred behaviors

  19. New Data: Title I - 56.1% Parents aware of services Parent/School agreement sent home – 87.7% Parent Involvement Policy - 64.9%

  20. Climate Survey • Analysis: • Parents believe staff are working hard for all students • Parents need more information about Title I • Students scores consistently low in all categories except school safety • Strategy w/ Evidence of Impact: • Increased parent involvement – ELL parent night, Curriculum Night AYP presentation, Watch D.O.G.S • Continued anti-bullying education • Increased community building activities • Next Steps: • Parent Orientation 9/1/11, Math/Reading Nights • More AYP/Data information in Star Scoop • Parent Representative on School Improvement Team • Continue STAR family events

  21. Targets for 2011-2012 By Spring 2011, 88.1% or more of Soos Creek 3rd-5th grade students & 82.5% or more of SC 6th grade students will meet standard on the Reading Measurement of Student Progress (MSP). If the AYP target is not met, the number of students not meeting standard in grades 3-6 will be reduced by 10% or more. By Spring 2011, 88.1% or more of Soos Creek 3rd-5th grade students & 82.5% or more of SC 6th grade students will meet standard on the Reading Measurement of Student Progress (MSP). If the AYP target is not met, the number of students not meeting standard in grades 3-6 will be reduced by 10% or more. Black R/M– Reduce by a minimum of 10% the number of Black students not meeting standard on the MSP

More Related