1 / 15

Abstract

Abstract.

toviel
Télécharger la présentation

Abstract

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Abstract Microorganisms were isolated from a chat pile and soil in the vicinity. Chat is a byproduct of lead mining that is high in Pb content, >16,000 ppm, a natural environment which would enrich for lead tolerant microbes. Soil samples contained 2,000 – 4,000 ppm, of which 56-67% was bioavailable as determined by differential extraction procedures. Lead tolerant bacteria and one yeast were isolated on Roane minimal media with 1 mM total Pb concentration. The microbes were tested for tolerance to lead on media with 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM total lead. From soil, the yeast, isolate Pb3, was the most resistant, growing on media with 5 mM lead. Bacterial isolates Pb1, Pb4, and Pb5 grew at concentrations of 2.5 mM. Pb1 was the only isolate to grow at 37 oC and was identified as a Pseudomonas species by the Vitek ID test panel, either stutzeri (55% confidence) or fluorescens (55% confidence). From chat, distinct colony morphotypes CPC2, CPC3, CPC4, CPC5, CPA1, CPA2, and CPA6 all grew at 2.5 mM lead. As a control 29 species of known bacteria and 4 species of fungi were tested on the same medium. Of these, 11 bacteria and all the fungi were able to grow, albeit slowly, on plates containing 1 mM lead. Interestingly, several bacteria, not normally known to produce pigments, displayed reddish brown coloration suggesting Pb3O4 precipitation. Only isolates CPC3 and CPA1 showed similar coloration. To identify bacteria that do not grow at 37 oC, chromosomal DNA was extracted from each isolate and the 16S rDNA genes are being PCR amplified. Products have been cloned and sequenced using M13 forward and reverse universal primers. Sequences were compared to those in NCBI databases using the BLAST protocol. Ribosomal data has obtained from two isolates to date. Pb4 most closely resembles Ochrobactrum, a denitrifying soil organism which is known to be metal resistant and have significant bioremediation potential. Partial CPA2 sequence suggests that it is an Arthrobacter species, perhaps oxydans. This study extends our knowledge of the ecology and diversity of Pb resistant microorganisms, and they are already being studied for the physiology of their interaction with lead.

  2. Lead Mining in Missouri • East central Missouri is known as the lead-belt region. • Chat is the byproduct of mining lead ore. Large mounds of the material dot the landscape in the lead belt. • Although the lead concentration is considered hazardous, little has been done to contain it. • Hypothesis: Chat represents a natural enrichment for lead-resistant microorganisms.

  3. Lead Content, ppm, of Soil and Chat, and Origin of Isolates a method of Shuman, 1985. Soil Science140:11-22

  4. Isolation • Bacteria were eluteda from chat and applied to the surface of agar plates. • Defined chemical media containing 1 mM Pb lead called “Roane Media”b • This media is formulated to minimize precipitation of lead. • [Pb]soluble = 0.045[Pb]total-0.12 mM a Konopka, et al. 1999. Applied and Environmental Microbiology65:2256-2259 b Roane 1999. Microbial Ecology37:218-224

  5. Pb3 = Unidentified yeast, Perhaps Rhodospora toruloides • Imagesa • a. Grown in Roane media with no lead • b. Grown in Roane media with 1.5 mM Pb, not stained • c. Grown in Roane media with 1.5 mM stained • FAME analysis unable to match any known yeast • WEB IDb Rhodospora toruloides a Seabaugh et al., Manuscript in preparation; ASM Q-312 b www.2.cbs.knaw.nl/yeast.asp

  6. CPA2 = CPC2 =Arthrobacter oxydansor Arthrobacter polychromogenes • Common soil bacterium • Gram (+) irregular rods • CPA2 - 0.466 FAME similarity index • CPC2 - 0.774 FAME similarity index • CPA2 – Score 2742 (1521 bases) Blasta • CPA2 – Nearest neighbor by RDPb /Phylip Interface A. polychromogenes Roane TSA Roane 1 mM Pb Roane 2.5 mM Pb a http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast b http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/html/

  7. Pb4 = Ochrobactrum • Organism known to be tolerant of high heavy metal and salt concentrations. • Gram (–) rod shaped bacterium. • Score 2773 (1479 bases) Blast • Nearest neighbor by RDPb /Phylip Interface Ochrobactrum sp. Str. S1 Roane TSA Roane 1 mM Pb Roane 2.5 mM Pb

  8. CPA1=CPC3=New Isolate • Gram (+) bacterium not previously described • Color variation may be due to lead precipitation • Poor match (0.04) to Microbacterium by FAME Roane Roane 1 mM Pb

  9. CPA6 = CPC5 = Pb5 = Rhodococcus fascians (luteus) • Gram (+) GC Subgroup B • Common soil isolate • CPA6 - 0.912 FAME similarity index • Misidentified as Colwellia by short DNA sequence Appearance of R. fascians on Pb gradient plate 5 mM Pb 0 mM Pb No Growth

  10. Color Variation in Lead-grown Controls and Isolates Enterobacter aerogenes Roane Media – 1 mM lead Various Lead Species Roane Media - No lead • Species of known bacteria, including Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Bacillus, displayed a morphological shift to a reddish brown color • A similar effect was seen with the yeast Pb3 and CPA1(CPC3) • The contending hypothesis include; • 1) production of a secondary metabolite, such as a chelator • 2) cell association of a lead precipitate, which is seen with Pb3 PbO2 Pb3O4

  11. Phylogeny of Lead Resistant Bacteria Pseudomonas marginalis LMG2210 Pseudomonas putida F1 Escherichia coli K12 Rubrivivax gelatinosus ATCC 17011 Ochrobactrum sp. S1 Ochrobactrum sp. Pb4 Rhodopseudomonas palustris GH Rhodospirillum rubrum 11170 Geobacter metallireducens GS15 Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 33560 Bacillus megaterium DSM32 Clostridium sordelli ATCC 9714 Rhodococcus fascians Arthrobacter polychromogenes 2568 Arthrobacter CPA2 Deinococcus radiodurans ATCC 35073

  12. Phylogenetic Analysis of Lead Resistant Strains • 16S rDNA genes were amplified with primers A and Ha. Amplicons were ligated into pCR2.1, and inserts were sequence using M13 forward and reverse primers (BioResource Center, Cornell University). • Sequences for isolates Pb4 and CPA2 were compared with those in GenBank using the Blast protocol, and were identified as Ochrobactrum and Arthrobacter species respectively. • The phylogenetic tree below was constructed using the Phylip Interface available through the Ribosomal Database Project. The distance matrix was calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter method with empirical base frequencies and a transition/transversion ratio of 2. The tree was calculated using the Neighbor-joining method with randomized input of strains and Deinococcus as the out group. • Color coding • Names in red are those sequences obtained in this research • Names in blue are surrogate sequences for strains identified by FAME • Names in green are surrogate sequences for strains identified by Roane • Names in black are reference strains for various phylogenetic groupings a Massol-Deya, et al. 1995 In, Methods in Molecular Microbial Ecology

  13. FAME Results

  14. Identification of Lead-Resistant Microorganisms

  15. Acknowledgements • Funding for this project came from the Southeast Missouri State University Undergraduate Research Program. The presenting authors (pictured above) would like to thank Dr. Allan Bornstein and Provost Dr. Jane Stephens for their support of undergraduate research. • James Collins would like to thank members of his Graduation with Distinction advisory committee Drs. Allen Gathman, Bjorn Olesen, John Kraemer, and Philip Crawford for their guidance. Dr. Rex strange provided insight on the phylogenetic analysis. • Funding for student travel was made available through the Southeast Missouri State University Student Professional Development program (Drs. Rick Burns and Christina Frazier), and the Southeast Research Conference (Dr. Martha Zlokovich). • The authors would like to thank the following people for their excellent technical assistance: Maija Bluma, Jennifer Arnold, and Andrew Corcoran. Also, Vicki Howell and Joanna Kubik provided administrative support.

More Related