1 / 1

Profiling Memory Subsystem Performance in an Advanced POWER Virtualization Environment

L2-Cache Access Resolution Site. Load Latency. 14 cycles. L2 cache. L3 cache. 91 cycles. L2.75 cache. 121 cycles. L3.75 cache. 205 cycles. LMEM. 281 cycles. RMEM. 307 cycles. 4. 1. Virtualization. Data Collection. L3. L3. DCM 0. DCM 1. APP 1 OS 1. APP 4 OS 4. APP 3 OS 3.

trygg
Télécharger la présentation

Profiling Memory Subsystem Performance in an Advanced POWER Virtualization Environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. L2-Cache Access Resolution Site Load Latency 14 cycles L2 cache L3 cache 91 cycles L2.75 cache 121 cycles L3.75 cache 205 cycles LMEM 281 cycles RMEM 307 cycles 4 1 Virtualization Data Collection L3 L3 DCM 0 DCM 1 APP1 OS1 APP4 OS4 APP3 OS3 APP2 OS2 APPN OSN P P P P L2 L2 POWER Hypervisor MEM MEM 372872 184469 0.328104637 000000000000A8C4 0000000000218880 Effective Instruction Address Effective Data Address PID TID Timestamp 2 Events Profiled 5 Data Analysis and Results L3 L3 DCM 0 DCM 1 P P P P L2 L2 MEM MEM 6 Publications Sampled Event Traces Data Collection Environment Load DB Java Tool PID TID Timestamp InstrAddr DataAddr PID TID Timestamp InstrAddr DataAddr PID TID Timestamp InstrAddr DataAddr p570 TRADE3 Database Report Generator Java Tool Graphs Reports 5 BufferPool 56893 29384 6 Data,BSS,Heap 8799 4855 1 Kernel 23485 9840 Profiling Memory Subsystem Performance in an Advanced POWER Virtualization Environment The prominent role of the memory hierarchy as one of the major bottlenecks in achieving good program performance has motivated the search for ways of capturing the memory performance of an application/machine pair that is both practical in terms of time and space, yet detailed enough to gain useful and relevant information. The strategy that we endorse periodically samples events during program execution, producing an event trace that is both manageable and informative. Additionally, we developed a fast and flexible performance evaluation framework with which to analyze and understand the performance data contained within the sampled event traces. We have shown the potential of our performance evaluation methodology by using it to analyze a disparate set of performance issues for large, complex applications running on a multiprocessor system. For example, we have applied our methodology to characterize performance issues such as memory access performance, process migration, compulsory and conflict misses, and false sharing. To date, we have studied the memory subsystem performance of several complex applications, including the TPC-C and SPECsfs benchmarks, executing on different configurations of the IBM eServer pSeries 690. Additionally, we have begun to investigate the effectiveness of our performance evaluation framework when studying memory subsystem performance in a virtualized environment. Virtualization allows multiple execution environments to time-share the same physical hardware in an effort to increase machine utilization. However, there is an inherent performance overhead associated with sharing a fixed set of hardware resources. The goal of our work is to identify and analyze the performance overhead associated with virtualization using our performance evaluation framework. To date, we have studied the memory subsystem performance of TRADE3, an on-line stock brokerage application, executing on different configurations of the IBM eServer p5 570, a commercial server designed to support virtualization. Department of Computer Science Austin, TX Bret Olszewski Mala Anand Carole Gottlieb Diana Villa, Ph.D. Candidate Mitesh Meswani, Ph.D. Candidate Dr. Patricia Teller, Professor • Virtualize resources to facilitate time-sharing of the hardware by different execution environments • Emergence of virtualization technology in new environments (e.g., newer architectures, open source) • POWER Hypervisor facilitates resource sharing and supports as many as 254 active partitions Environment • IBM eServer p5 570 (p570) architecture • 1.65 GHz POWER5 processor • 4-processor configuration Workload • TRADE3 • On-line stock brokerage application • Three-tier configuration Websphere, DB2, Application Code Data • Collected via Event-based Sampling (record periodic occurrence of monitored event) • Organized as Sampled Event Traces (one per CPU) • Event Record • L2-Cache Data Load Misses - require the CPU to access off-chip memory to be resolved • Classified according to level at which they are resolved and state of the requested block • Performance overhead associated with virtualization due to sharing a fixed-set of hardware resources • Goal: Observe differences in data-load behavior that could represent the performance overhead • Compared executions of TRADE3 in non-virtualized (1P) and virtualized (5P) environments • Observed an increased locality of reference for 5P data-loads in memory • Indicates a possible increase in capacity/conflict misses in 5P case due to contention for hardware resources Load Latencies of 4-processor Configuration 4-processor configuration of the p570 L2.75 (different DCM) L3 L3.75 (different DCM) LMEM LMEM (different DCM) 3 Performance Framework • MySQL databases catalog/store sampled event traces • Java tools interface with databases to load sampled event traces and run queries • 2005 • Villa, D., Meswani, M., Teller, P.J., and Olszewski, B., "Profiling Memory Subsystem Performance in an Advanced POWER Virtualization Environment", To appear in the Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Operating System Interference in High Performance Applications, September 2004, St. Louis, MO. • Portillo, R., Villa, D., Teller, P.J., and Olszewski, B., "Mining Performance Data from Sampled Event Traces", Proceedings of the 6th Annual Austin Center for Advanced Studies (CAS) Conference, February 2005, Austin, TX. • 2004 • Villa, D., Acosta, J., Teller, P.J., Olszewski, B., and Morgan, T., "Memory Performance Profiling via Sampled Performance Monitor Event Traces", Proceedings of the 5th Annual Los Alamos Computer Science Institute Symposium (LACSI), October, 2004, Santa Fe, NM. • Portillo, R., Villa, D., Teller, P.J., and Olszewski, B., "Mining Performance Data from Sampled Event Traces", Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), October 2004, Volendam, The Netherlands. • Villa, D., Acosta, J., Teller, P.J., Olszewski, B., and Morgan, T., "A Framework for Profiling Multiprocessor Memory Performance", Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), July 2004, Long Beach, CA. • Villa, D., Acosta, J., Teller, P.J., Olszewski, B., and Morgan, T., "Memory Performance Profiling via Sampled Performance Monitor Event Traces", Proceedings of the 5th Annual Austin Center for Advanced Studies (CAS) Conference, February 2004, Austin, TX. • 2003 • Villa, D. (2003). Using Sampled Performance Monitor Event Traces to Characterize Application Behavior. Unpublished master's thesis, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX. • Morgan, T., Villa, D., Teller, P.J., Olszewski, B., and Acosta, J., "L2 Miss Profiling on the p690 for a Large-scale Database Application", Proceedings of the 4th Annual Austin Center for Advanced Studies (CAS) Conference, February 2003, Austin, TX.

More Related