1 / 84

Introduction & Flood Hydrologic Analysis

Introduction & Flood Hydrologic Analysis. CE154 - Hydraulic Design Lectures 1-2. 1. Green Sheet. Course Objective - Introduce design concept and procedure for a few basic types of hydraulic structures that an engineer may encounter

Antony
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction & Flood Hydrologic Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction & Flood Hydrologic Analysis CE154 - Hydraulic Design Lectures 1-2 CE154 1

  2. Green Sheet • Course Objective - Introduce design concept and procedure for a few basic types of hydraulic structures that an engineer may encounter • Hydraulic structures:- Water supply and distribution systems including spillways, reservoirs, pipeline systems - Flood protection systems including culverts, storm drains, & natural rivers CE154 2

  3. Green Sheet • Lecture Schedule • Homework assignments • Exams • Grading • Office hour • Communication – email address, web site • Emergency evacuation route • Grader selection CE154 3

  4. Introduction • Hydraulic Design – Design of Hydraulic Structures • Elements of Design (class discussion)- design objective- design criteria - design data and assumptions- design procedure- design calculations- design drawings- design report CE154 4

  5. Hydraulic Design example • Design a channel that can safely carry the storm runoff generated from a 1% flood from a residential development that is 20 square miles in drainage area. • Design objective: • Design criteria: • Design data and assumptions: • Design procedure: CE154 5

  6. Flood Hydrology • Design flood Discharge (design flow)- peak flow rate governing the design of relevant hydraulic structures • Design flood Hydrograph- time-flow history of a design flood CE154 6

  7. Sample Flood Hydrograph CE154

  8. Hydrology • Rainfall – Runoff Process CE154 8

  9. Hydrologic Parameters • Precipitationintensity & duration for design • Infiltration rate (watershed soil type and moisture condition) • Watershed surface cover – overland roughness • Watershed drainage network geometry • Watershed slope • Time of concentration CE154 9

  10. Rainfall – Runoff Process • Gauged Watershed-flood frequency analysis to determine peak design flow rate-Gauge data to calibrate unit hydrograph and generate design flood hydrograph • Ungauged Watershed-Hydrologic Modeling (HEC-HMS or HEC-1)-Regional regression analysis-Synthetic unit hydrograph CE154 10

  11. Flood Hydrology Studies • determine design rainfall duration and intensity- design rainfall ranges from probable maximum precipitation (PMP) on the high end to 100-year or 10-year return period rainfall event • develop design runoff hydrograph – includes peak flow rate and runoff volume to size reservoir and design spillway and other pertinent structures CE154 11

  12. Our Topics • Determine probable maximum precipitation (PMP) -”Theoretically the greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically possible over a given storm area at a particular geographical location at a certain time of the year” (HMR55A) • Bureau of Reclamation’s S-graph & dimensionless unit hydrograph methods of developing synthetic unit hydrograph • Clark unit hydrograph method CE154 12

  13. PMP • National Weather Service Hydrometeorological Reports (HMR)provide maximum 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hour PMP’s for areas of 10, 200, 1000, 5000 and 10,000 mi2.HMR 58 – Probable Maximum Precipitation for California – Calculation Procedures, NOAA, Oct. 1998 (supersedes HMR36, Note errata for pp. 22 & 27) • http://www.weather.gov/oh/hdsc/studies/pmp.html#HR58 CE154 13

  14. Rainfall Losses • Surface retention, evaporation and storage (usually small compared to infiltration) • Infiltration- Ranges 0.05  0.5 in/hr approximately- L = Lmin + (Lo – Lmin)e-ktL = resulting infiltration rateLmin = minimum rate when saturatedLo = maximum or initial infiltration rate • Rainfall – losses = Rainfall Excess CE154 14

  15. PMP Computation Example • Read pp. 43-48 of HMR 58 • 973 mi2 Auburn drainage above Folsom Lake • Step 1Outline drainage boundary and overlay the 10-mi2, 24-hour PMP map from Plate 2, HMR 58 • Step 2Determine to use all-season or seasonal PMP for design CE154 15

  16. Plate 2 California – Northern General Storm PMP Index Map (in inches) CE154 16

  17. PMP Computation Example CE154 17

  18. PMP Computation Example • Step 3Calculate average PMP value (for 10 mi2 and 24-hr) over drainage area = 24.6 inches (using a planimeter or griddled paper overlay) • Step 4Depth-Duration Relationship- Auburn drainage is within the Sierra region. Use Table 2.1 to obtain ratios for durations from 1 to 72 hours CE154 18

  19. PMP Computation Example CE154 19

  20. PMP Computation Example CE154 20

  21. PMP Computation Example • Multiply the average value for 10-mi2, 24-hour PMP of 24.6 inches by these ratios CE154 21

  22. PMP Computation Example • Step 6Determine aerial reduction factors using the Auburn drainage area of 973 mi2 & Fig. 2.15 CE154 22

  23. PMP Computation Example • Fig 2.15, HMR 58 CE154 23

  24. PMP Computation Example CE154 24

  25. PMP Computation Example • Step 7Apply aerial reduction by multiplying PMP’s from Step 5 by factors from Step 6 CE154 25

  26. PMP Computation Example • Step 8Plot the depth-duration data on Fig. 2.19 CE154 26

  27. PMP Computation Example • Extract cumulative depths from Fig. 2.19 CE154 27

  28. PMP Computation Example • Compute incremental depths CE154 28

  29. PMP Computation Example • Adjust temporal-distribution of these incremental rainfall based on historical data or by experiments. Keep the 4 highest increments in a series. A PMP isohyetal distribution may be CE154 29

  30. PMP Computation - summary • Need Hydrometeorological Report HMR 58 for northern California • Define general storms up to 72 hours in duration and 10,000 mi2 in area and local storms up to 6 hours and 500 mi2 • Start with a total PMP depth for a general area and end with intensity-time distribution of rain for a specific watershed – this is the design rainfall CE154 30

  31. How to turn PMP (design rainfall) into PMF (design runoff)? • Unit hydrograph – a rainfall-runoff relationship characteristic of the watershed - developed in 1930’s, easy to use, less data requirements, less costly- many methods, most often seen include Soil Conservation Service (SCS) method, Snyder, Clark, and Bureau of Reclamation dimensionless unit hydrograph and S-curve methods • hydrologic modeling – used widely since PC became popular, requiring data of topo contours, surface cover, infiltration ch., etc., HEC-HMS (HEC-1) CE154 31

  32. Unit Hydrograph • Basic unit hydrograph theory A storm of a constant intensity over a duration (e.g, 1 hour), and of uniform distribution, produces 1 inch of excess that runs off the surface. The hydrograph that is recorded at the outlet of the watershed is a 1-hr unit hydrograph • Define several parameters to characterize the watershed response: e.g., lag time or time of concentration, time-discharge relationship, channel storage attenuation – synthetic unit hydrograph CE154 32

  33. Unit Hydrograph Assumptions • Rainfall excess and losses may be lumped as basin-average values (lumped) • Ordinates of runoff is linearly proportional to rainfall excess values (linearity) • Rainfall-runoff relationship does not change with time (time invariance) CE154 33

  34. Hydrograph Development CE154 34

  35. Unit Hydrograph Approaches • Conceptual models of runoff – single-linear reservoir (S=kO), Nash (multiple linear reservoirs), Clark (consider effect of basin shape on travel time) • Empirical models – Snyder, Soil Conservation Service dimensionless method • Different methods use different parameters to define the unit hydrograph CE154 35

  36. Unit Hydrograph Parameters • Time lag – time between center of mass of rainfall and center of mass of runoff, original definition by Horner & Flynt [1934], (SCS, Snyder). Different formulae were developed based on different watershed data (e.g., SCS & BuReC) • Time of concentration - time between end of rainfall excess and inflection point of receding runoff (Clark) • Time to peak – beginning of rise to peak (SCS) • Storage coefficient – R (Clark) • Temporal distribution of runoff (BuReC, SCS) CE154 36

  37. Unit Hydrograph & parameters Rainfall excess = precipipation - loss Lag time Receding limb Q Time of concentration Point of inflection Rising limb Peak Time time CE154 37

  38. Synthetic Unit Hydrograph • Uses Lag Time and a temporal distribution (dimensionless or S-graph) to develop the unit hydrograph CE154 38

  39. Lag Time • Unit Hydrograph Lag Time (Tlag or Lg) per Bureau of Reclamation CE154 39

  40. Lag Time • Lg = unit hydrograph lag time in hours • L = length of the longest watercourse from the point of concentration to the drainage boundary, in miles L Lca CE154 Point of concentration 40

  41. Lag Time • Lca = length along the longest watercourse from the point of concentration to a point opposite the centroid of the drainage basin, in miles • S = average slope of the longest watercourse, in feet per mile • C, N = constant CE154 41

  42. Lag Time • Based on empirical data, regardless of basin location • N = 0.33 • C = 26Kn where Kn is the average Manning’s roughness coefficient for the drainage network • Note: other methods such as Snyder and SCS define lag time slightly differently CE154 42

  43. Lag Time • To allow estimate of lag time, the Bureau of Reclamation reconstituted 162 flood hydrographs from numerous natural basins west of Mississippi River to provide charts for lag time for 6 different regions of the US • Use Table 3-5 & Fig. 3-7 of DSD for lag time estimate for SF Bay Area CE154 43

  44. Lag Time CE154 44

  45. Lag Time • Example, Table 3-5 on p.42, DSD- San Francisquito Creek near Stanford University, drainage area 38.3 mi2, lag time 4.8 hours, Kn 0.110- Matadero Creek at Palo Alto, drainage area 7.2 mi2, lag time 3.7 hours, Kn 0.119 CE154 45

  46. UH Temporal Distribution • Time vs. Discharge relationship • Bureau of Reclamation uses 2 methods to develop temporal distribution based on recorded hydrographs divided into 6 regions across the US:- dimensionless unit hydrograph method, &- S-graph technique • Tables 3-15 and 3-16 (Design of Small Dams) for the SF Bay Area CE154 46

  47. Temporal Dist. – Table 3-16 CE154 47

  48. Temp. Dist. - S-graph Method CE154 48

  49. S-graph method - Example • Read pp. 37-52 of Design of Small Dams • drainage area = 250 mi2 • lag time = 12 hours • unit duration = 12/5  2 hours (SCS recommendation) • Ultimate discharge = drainage area in mi2 times 52802/3600/12 and divided by unit duration, in this case = 80662.5 cfs CE154 49

  50. S-graph method - example CE154 50

More Related