1 / 40

Sp. Ed. Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008

Sp. Ed. Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008. Nori C. Mora, Ed.D. Center for Teaching and Learning. Welcome: Nori Mora. Announcements District News. TAKS Alt. Kimberly Cook. Assistive Technology Speech & Language Deaf & Hard of Hearing. Kimberly Cook.

Antony
Télécharger la présentation

Sp. Ed. Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sp. Ed. Directors’MeetingSeptember 18, 2008 Nori C. Mora, Ed.D. Center for Teaching and Learning

  2. Welcome: Nori Mora • Announcements • District News copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  3. TAKS Alt Kimberly Cook copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  4. Assistive Technology Speech & Language Deaf & Hard of Hearing Kimberly Cook copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  5. Discipline / CPI: Priscilla Oebel • CPI Correct fee is $30 • Schoolwide Discipline • New campuses-4 • Year 2 campuses-5 • Year 3 campuses-12 copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  6. State Performance Plan and State Determinations: ESC Consultants copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  7. SPP 7Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in the three outcomes Dina Hinojosa 361-561-8524 dina.hinojosa@esc2.us

  8. Data Collection • entry data should be collected within 30 school days after the child begins receiving special education services • Collect 2008-2009 information on a hard copy of the COSF form • Keep this data collection in student’s permanent special education folder • SPP7 data collection application will not be open for the input of the 2008-09 data until early spring. (TEASE account) • New Binder for directors. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  9. Trainings for 2008-2009 • “Using the COSF” trainings will be available at the ESC on October 2 and November 13 • Only “NEW” staff should attend this training • Child Development training will be available in October and November • New directors training for COSF data submission??? See Dina for dates/times • TOT for districts are available in a 2-day training copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  10. SPP 11 TIMELY EVALUATION for initials ages 3-21 years

  11. Data Collection • A=total number of students with initial referral during the 07-08 school year ages 3-21 • B=determined NOT eligible within 90 days • C=determined eligible within 90 days • D=determined NOT eligible after 90 days • D1=90-120 days • D2=120+ days • D3=provide reason • E=determined eligible after 90 days • E1=90-120 days • E2=120+ days • E3=provide reason copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  12. SPP 12 EARLY CHILDHOOD TRANSITION for 3-year-olds

  13. Data Collection – Part I • Part I = ECI to ISD • A=total number of 3 year-old students referred from ECI during the 07-08 school year • B1=referred but determined (by ARD) NOT eligible by age 3 • B2=referred but determined (by ARD) NOT eligible after age 3 • B2A=1-29 days • B2B=30+ days • B3=reason(s) for delay in holding ARD • C1=referred and determined (by ARD) eligible by age 3 • C2=referred and determined (by ARD) eligible after age 3 • C2A=1-29 days • C2B=30+ days • C3=reason(s) for delay in developing and implementing IEP copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  14. Data Collection – Part II • Part II = not previously served by ECI to ISD • D=total number of 3 year-old students referred during the 07-08 school year • E1=referred but determined (by ARD) NOT eligible by age 3 • E2=referred but determined (by ARD) NOT eligible after age 3 • B2A=1-29 days • B2B=30+ days • E3=reason(s) for delay in holding ARD • F1=referred and determined (by ARD) eligible by age 3 • F2=referred and determined (by ARD) eligible after age 3 • C2A=1-29 days • C2B=30+ days • F3=reason(s) for delay in developing and implementing IEP copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  15. More information • Window for collection opens early-mid October • Open for 30 days maximum • June 30, 2007-July 1, 2008 • Apply for TEASE role –data entry agent or certifier • Be prepared to input data very soon • Q & A coming soon… copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  16. SPP Indicator 13Valerie Trevino • Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet postsecondary goals. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  17. Indicator 13 Data CollectionSpring 2009 • New-Updated Checklist for Measurement • New-Updated Student Folder/IEP Review Chart (To be used as guidance for Checklist for Measurement of Indicator 13) • On-line Template • Will now go through TEASEaccount. • *Refer to Folder handed out today. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  18. SPP Indicator 14 • Percent of youth who had IEP’s are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of post-secondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school. • Data collected will be analyzed from the post-secondary follow up survey to gain indication of percentage of students with disabilities who have enrolled in postsecondary education institutions. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  19. IEP Facilitation: Barbie Tumlinson October Training Dates Advanced FacilitationOctober 13 – 14 Email will go out to directors and invited participants with the workshop # & passcode. Follow Up Day October 15 Email will go out to ALL previous participants. This workshop does not require a passcode. Basic Training*October 16 – 17 Aransas County Flour Bluff Alice CCISD (5 teams) copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  20. IEP Facilitation: Barbie Tumlinson December (Ike’s Make Up) Training Dates Basic Training*December 11 – 12 Brush Country Flour Bluff Tuloso-Midway Aransas Pass CCISD (4 teams) * For the basic trainings, an email will go out to directors with the workshop # & passcode. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  21. IEP Facilitation: Barbie Tumlinson Free ARD Facilitation By Nick Martin Friday, September 26, 2008 If interested, please see Barbie! copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  22. IEP Facilitation: Barbie Tumlinson Region 2 Data is IN! Working on compiling the findings… • will provide specific information to the 14 schools on the list and • regional information at the next directors meeting in October. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  23. XBA: Barbie Tumlinson NEED Trainings with Robert Misak September 3, December 10 & April 8 Coming Soon… Essentials of Cross Battery Assessment With Dr. Sam Ortiz October 14, 15, & 16 copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  24. Parent Trainings: Barbie Tumlinson & Valerie Trevino Tuesday, September 23, 2008 Presenter: Terri Sowder Positive Behavioral Interventions 8:30 – 11:30 a.m. Understanding Bullying Behavior 1:00 – 4:00 p.m. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  25. Update from Significant Disproportionally Symposium Julie Brauchle copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  26. Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Rationale : If we can identify and address learning difficulties early, we have a better chance of “fixing” those difficulties quickly. If we wait to identify learning difficulties, we run the risk of increasing the remediation time. An LEA can use up to 15% of IDEA Part B funds to provide CEIS for students who are not identified as needing special education or related services copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  27. HOW can the funds be spent? • Supplement – not supplant • Professional development • Providing educational and behavioral evaluations (not to be used to qualify a student for special education) • Providing educational services and supports (reading, math and/or RtI specialists; tutoring programs; supplemental programs; using related service personnel) • Tier 2 and 3 RtI activities copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  28. On WHOM may CEIS funds be spent? • Students K-12 (particularly K-3) • Not receiving ANY special education services • Students who have received special ed in the past, but are currently not receiving special ed ARE eligible copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  29. What are the reporting REQUIREMENTS? • An LEA is required to annually report to the state on the number of children receiving EIS and the number of those children who eventually are identified as children with disabilities and receive special education and related services during the preceding TWO YEAR period. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  30. EIS Guidance Document • MOE and EIS are interconnected. The decisions that an LEA makes about the amount of funds that it uses for one purpose affect the amount that it may use for the other. The guidance document at the following link has this information in depth: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/eis/eis-qanda.doc copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  31. Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) video explanation http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cdynamic%2CVideoClips%2C16%2C copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  32. Significant Disproportionality Symposium States must collect and examine to determine if significant disproportionality based on race or ethnicity exists in: • 6 of the disability categories (LD, MR, S/L impairments, OHI, Autism, & ED) • Placement of children in particular educational settings • The incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary action copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  33. Significant Disproportionality Symposium • The states decide what is “significant.” • TEA first looked at PBMAS 15 & 16 and SPP 9 & 10 • Then they ran further statistical reports. • They compared various race/ethnicities to each other and looked at the odds/ratio, i.e. African American v. Asian • First identified 90 districts then arbitrarily set the cut point at 2.5 and then identified 41 districts. • The cut point can change. • Encourage districts to look at their data for patterns. • Several really good tools developed by Region1 and 13. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  34. Statewide Assessments: Valerie Trevino • TEA updates: • Changes have been made to the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills*Alternate Assessment. • We are pleased to have the opportunity for TAKS-Alt representatives from TEA present to Region 2 on what's new for the 2008-2009 TAKS-Alt on November 10. • Please visit our website to register www.esc2.us.  We will offer 2 repeated sessions.  Morning session workshop #0821722.  Afternoon (repeated) session # 0821734. copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  35. Accountability: Dawn Schuenemann copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  36. Title I / NCLB: Andi Kuyatt and Joel Trudeau copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  37. GT / Differentiation: Mary Beth Jaeger copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  38. ESC2 Core Curriculum Consultants: copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  39. Roundtable Discussion: Directors copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

  40. Varia: Directors copyright 2006 www.brainybetty.com

More Related