1 / 43

Uncertain, High-Dimensional Dynamical Systems

Uncertain, High-Dimensional Dynamical Systems. Igor Mezić. University of California, Santa Barbara. IPAM, UCLA, February 2005. Introduction. Measure of uncertainty? Uncertainty and spectral theory of dynamical systems. Model validation and data assimilation. Decompositions.

JasminFlorian
Télécharger la présentation

Uncertain, High-Dimensional Dynamical Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Uncertain, High-Dimensional Dynamical Systems Igor Mezić University of California, Santa Barbara IPAM, UCLA, February 2005

  2. Introduction • Measure of uncertainty? • Uncertainty and spectral theory of dynamical systems. • Model validation and data assimilation. • Decompositions.

  3. Dynamical evolution of uncertainty: an example x Output measure Input measure Tradeoff:Bifurcation vs. contracting dynamics

  4. Dynamical evolution of uncertainty: general set-up Skew-product system.

  5. Dynamical evolution of uncertainty: general set-up

  6. Dynamical evolution of uncertainty: general set-up f f T F(z) 1 0

  7. Dynamical evolution of uncertainty: simple examples Fw(z) 1 0 Expanding maps: x’=2x

  8. A measure of uncertainty of an observable 1 0

  9. Computation of uncertainty in CDF metric

  10. Maximal uncertainty for CDF metric 1 0

  11. Variance, Entropy and Uncertainty in CDF metric 0

  12. Uncertainty in CDF metric: Pitchfork bifurcation x Output measure Input measure

  13. Time-averaged uncertainty 1 0

  14. Conclusions

  15. Introduction PV=NkT • Example: thermodynamics from statistical mechanics “…Any rarified gas will behave that way, no matter how queer the dynamics of its particles…” Goodstein (1985) • Example:Galerkin truncation of evolution equations. • Information comes from a single observable time-series.

  16. Introduction When do two dynamical systems exhibit similar behavior?

  17. Introduction • Constructive proof that ergodic partitions and invariant • measures of systems can be compared using a • single observable (“Statistical Takens-Aeyels” theorem). • A formalism based on harmonic analysis that extends • the concept of comparing the invariant measure.

  18. Set-up Time averages and invariant measures:

  19. Set-up

  20. Pseudometrics for Dynamical Systems • Pseudometricthat captures statistics: where

  21. Ergodic partition

  22. Ergodic partition

  23. An example: analysis of experimental data

  24. Analysis of experimental data

  25. Analysis of experimental data

  26. Koopman operator, triple decomposition, MOD -Efficient representation of the flow field; can be done with vectors -Lagrangian analysis: FLUCTUATIONS MEAN FLOW PERIODIC APERIODIC Desirable: “Triple decomposition”:

  27. Embedding

  28. Conclusions • Constructive proof that ergodic partitions and invariant • measures of systems can be compared using a • single observable –deterministic+stochastic. • A formalism based on harmonic analysis that extends • the concept of comparing the invariant measure • Pseudometrics on spaces of dynamical systems. • Statistics – based, linear (but infinite-dimensional).

  29. Introduction Everson et al., JPO 27 (1997)

  30. Introduction • 4 modes -99% • of the variance! • -no dynamics! Everson et al., JPO 27 (1997)

  31. Introduction In this talk: -Account explicitly for dynamics to produce a decomposition. -Tool: lift to infinite-dimensional space of functions on attractor + consider properties of Koopman operator. -Allows for detailed comparison of dynamical properties of the evolution and retained modes. -Split into “deterministic” and “stochastic” parts: useful for prediction purposes.

  32. Example: Factors and harmonic analysis

  33. Factors and harmonic analysis

  34. Harmonic analysis: an example

  35. Evolution equations and Koopman operator

  36. Evolution equations and Koopman operator Similar:“Wold decomposition”

  37. Evolution equations and Koopman operator But how to get this from data?

  38. Evolution equations and Koopman operator is almost-periodic. -Remainder has continuous spectrum!

  39. Conclusions -Use properties of the Koopman operator to produce a decomposition -Tool: lift to infinite-dimensional space of functions on attractor. -Allows for detailed comparison of dynamical properties of the evolution and retained modes. -Split into “deterministic” and “stochastic” parts: useful for prediction purposes. -Useful for Lagrangian studies in fluid mechanics.

  40. -1 0 a1 a2 • But poor for dynamics: Irrationala’s produce the same statistics Invariant measures and time-averages Example:Probability histograms!

  41. Dynamical evolution of uncertainty: simple examples • Types of uncertainty: • Epistemic (reducible) • Aleatory (irreducible) • A-priori (initial conditions, • parameters, model structure) • A-posteriori (chaotic dynamics, • observation error) Expanding maps: x’=2x

  42. Uncertainty in CDF metric: Examples Uncertainty strongly dependent on distribution of initial conditions.

More Related