1 / 17

Cost Benefit Analysis

Cost Benefit Analysis. Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada . My name and the Citation of the cost benefit analysis. My Name: Sarah Abdulkarim. Title: Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada

Jeffrey
Télécharger la présentation

Cost Benefit Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cost Benefit Analysis Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada

  2. My name and the Citation of the cost benefit analysis • My Name: Sarah Abdulkarim. • Title: Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada • Source: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management v25, n3 (Summer 2006): 661-78 • Document Type: Journal Article • Database: Econ-Lit

  3. Introduction: • Worldwide, road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death by injury and the ninth leading cause of all deaths. • Traffic collisions kill about 43,000 Americans a year

  4. Could speed cameras be the solution?

  5. Primary questions need to be addressed • What are the Costs of the speed cameras? • What are the Benefits of the speed cameras? • Do speed cameras produce Net Benefits?

  6. Method used to analyze the questions • The study introduced all the cost and benefits of the speeding cameras on: • The societal point of view • Sponsoring-agency perspectives: Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC)

  7. Data source used in the article • The analysis that is used in this study is based on two years of program data (1996 through 1998)

  8. Total Program Costs • Tables 2 & 3: Both the societal and ICBC perspectives, Photo Radar Program costs were = C$27.3 million. • Cost of travel time = C$372 million per year

  9. Benefit from Reduction in Collisions, Injuries, Deaths, and Property Damage • it was estimated that the program prevented: • 2,220 fewer injury collisions (14%) • 79 fewer fatal collisions (26%) • Emergency response worth C$0.14 million was avoided by photo radar

  10. In the societal perspective… • lives and injuries were valued using estimated economic values of: -C$120,000 per injury collision -C$4.58 million per fatal collision. • From (Table 2), the value of safety benefits = C$514 million

  11. In the ICBC perspective • Estimated average claim costs of: -C$40,000 for each injury collision -C$50,000 for each fatal collision • Estimated claim savings (Table 3) of C$66 million.

  12. Summary of costs and benefits: • Net social benefit = C$115 million • The largest single benefit is the value of injuries, deaths, and property damage prevented =C$514 million/year • Photo Radar Program cost = $C27 million • Lost travel time cost = C$372 million/year

  13. Policy implications • Greater use of highway photo radar speed enforcement would be good public policy.

  14. Important elements that are addressed • My name and the citation of the cost benefit analysis • Primary questions addressed in the paper • Method used to analyze the questions • Data source used in the article • Results focusing on the implication for the primary questions • Policy implications

More Related