1 / 27

Gregory Canyon Landfill

Gregory Canyon Landfill. California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004. San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director. Proposition C. Approved in 1994 by 68% voters: Amended General Plan & Zoning Ordinance All permits other than land use required

Lucy
Télécharger la présentation

Gregory Canyon Landfill

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gregory Canyon Landfill California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004 San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director

  2. Proposition C Approved in 1994 by 68% voters: • Amended General Plan & Zoning Ordinance • All permits other than land use required • Required CEQA process • LEA became the CEQA lead agency • Imposed specific mitigation measures

  3. Proposition B • November 2004 ballot measure to repeal Proposition C • Defeated by 63% to 37% • Proposition C remains in effect • A form of public comment

  4. Public Participation and EIR Process Circulated three drafts for public comment • Same distribution and advertisement for all drafts • Available in 7 public locations • Advertised in Union Tribune • Copy with printer for public reproduction • Last two drafts on Internet and on CD

  5. Public Participation continued • Extended most comment periods beyond statutory 45 days • Two public hearings - Both in excess of 3 hours - Over 100 people testified at each

  6. Public Participation continued • Total of 210 days of public review was provided for all drafts of EIR • Nearly 600 comment letters/testimony from individuals and agencies on all versions • LEA and County Counsel spent 2,124 hours spent on EIR

  7. Public Participation continued • LEA Director certified Final EIR February 6, 2003 • CIWMB staff concurs that CEQA findings are sufficient and supported by record.

  8. Permit Development • Crafted to protect public health and safety • Reflects LEA permitting & lead agency roles Consistent with Public Resource Code and Titles 14 & 27 • Worked closely with other regulatory agencies to address permitting issues • CH2MHill hired to assist LEA in permit development • Organized permit by phases for better management of mitigation measures

  9. Permit Development continued • 243 site specific conditions associated with: - pre-construction & construction landfill operations - closure design and activities - post closure monitoring & maintenance • Ensures enforceability of 188 mitigation measures adopted in Final EIR • All issues raised were considered and resolved. • Close coordination with CIWMB staff

  10. Permit Development continued • LEA completed proposed permit on June 2, 2004 and submitted to CIWMB staff • CIWMB staff report indicates no technical or regulatory issues remain • LEA and County Counsel spent 1,290 hours on permit development • Total of 3,414 hours spent on project

  11. Other Permitting Agencies • San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board • US Army Corps of Engineers • US Fish & Wildlife and State Fish & Game • Caltrans and other State agencies • County of San Diego Review permits and modify JTD and Permit as necessary

  12. LEA Implementation Plan • LEA will hire one or more consultants to assist in oversight of Project • Oversee specialty reports and studies of biologists, archaeologist, noise specialist, etc. • Regular meetings with regulatory agencies • Enforce State minimum standards and all permit conditions

  13. Benefits Analysis • Technical review of drafts by County departments • October 2003 Final Benefit Analysis • Includes: - permitted capacity - economic benefits - increase in tax revenues - consistency with County/State policies

  14. Benefits Analysis Public Participation • Beyond CEQA requirements • Benefits Analysis posted on website and invited comments • Comments were also posted • LEA staff report posted on website • Invited comments and posted on website • Posted rebuttal comment on website

  15. Benefits Analysis continued Package given to LEA Director, including: • Benefits Analysis • Initial public comments • LEA staff report • Both rounds of subsequent comments • Rebuttal comment

  16. Benefits Analysis continued Other documents reviewed by Director: • Final EIR • Staff report on Final EIR • 1996 County Integrated Waste Management Plan including Siting Element • 2003 Draft Siting Element

  17. San Diego County Landfill Disposal Capacity with New & Expanded Landfills(Based on Annual Permitted Disposal Tons) Obtained from Draft Siting Element

  18. Decision Making Process by Gary ErbeckDirector of LEA

  19. San Diego County Landfill Disposal Capacity with New & Expanded Landfills(Based on Annual Permitted Disposal Tons) Obtained from Draft Siting Element

  20. LEGAL ISSUES Mark Mead, CEQA Legal Counsel Rod Lorang, LEA Legal Counsel

  21. Summary • Project includes all feasible mitigation: • CEQA, Proposition C, LEA, other Agencies • Project meets all CIWMB requirements • No unresolved technical, regulatory, or mitigation issues • Benefits of landfill outweighs identified unmitigated impacts • Votes on Propositions C and B support this project

  22. Statement of Overriding Considerations • Assist County in meeting 15 years capacity • Implement Policy 2.2 of Siting Element • Help implement Siting Element by providing capacity without relying on exportation • Added landfill capacity in North County • Select area where disposal facilities proposed to meet 15 years of capacity

  23. SOC Modifications • Proposed liner system may set new and higher standard • GCL will contribute $1 Million for safety improvement on SR 76 • Landfill will generate economic benefits

  24. San Diego County Landfill Disposal Permitted Capacitywith Additional Diversion 50% 55% 65% 75% Obtained from Draft Siting Element

More Related