1 / 26

Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate Border and Transportation Security Portfolio

Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate Border and Transportation Security Portfolio. Ms. Jeanne Lin Director, BTS Portfolio April 20, 2005. Agenda. S&T Organizational Background Border and Transportation Security (BTS) Mission and Objectives

Olivia
Télécharger la présentation

Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate Border and Transportation Security Portfolio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Department of Homeland SecurityScience & Technology DirectorateBorder and Transportation Security Portfolio Ms. Jeanne Lin Director, BTS Portfolio April 20, 2005

  2. Agenda • S&T Organizational Background • Border and Transportation Security (BTS) Mission and Objectives • BTS Portfolio Strategic Technology Planning • BTS Portfolio Program examples • Observations of a DHS “Plank Owner”

  3. Science and Technology Border & Transportation Security • U.S. Customs and Border Protection • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement • Transportation Security Administration • Federal Law Enforcement Training Center

  4. Department of Homeland SecurityScience and Technology Directorate Revised: 23 January 2004 Chief Of Staff Victor Tambone General Counsel Mark Robertson Public Affairs Donald Tighe Legislative Affairs Chuck Brooks Chief Information Officer Deborah Diaz WMD Ops & IM William Lyerly Director Office of the Under Secretary Charles E. McQueary, Ph.D. Under Secretary Programs, Plans & Budgets (PPB) Penrose Albright, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary and Principal Deputy to the Under Secretary Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency (HSARPA) Mr. Vayl Oxford Acting Director Systems Engineering & Development (SED) Mr. John Kubricky Director Office of Research & Development (ORD) Maureen McCarthy, Ph.D. Director Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations Douglas Smith Executive Secretary Shila Ressler Special Asst for External Affairs Vacant Deputy Policy Planning Vayl Oxford Director Management & Administration Arnold Gritzke (Acting) Deputy ORD Bob Hooks Deputy HSARPA Jane Alexander Deputy SED David Boyd Strategic Planning & Policy Vacant Border & Transportation Security Jeanne Lin Chief Scientist Michael Carter Office of Program Analysis & Evaluation Ann Morimizu National Labs Caroline Purdy (Acting) CBRNE Keith Ward (Acting) Human Capital Jackie Bowman Business Operations Manager Sharla Rausch Biological Countermeasures John Vitko Critical Infrastructure John Cummings Safety Act Wendy Howe University Programs Mel Bernstein Mission Support Kirk Evans BioWatch Pete Estacio Emergency Preparedness & Response Nancy Suski Chemical Countermeasures Randy Long International Affairs Holly Dockery Science-based Threat Assessment and Countermeasures Gerald Parker Advanced Technologies Jane Alexander (Acting) Counter MANPADS James Tuttle Cyber Security Simon Szykman High Explosives Countermeasures Frederick Roder Rapid Prototyping Larry Morgan S&T Countermeasures Test Bed Huban Gowadia Emerging Threats Larry Morgan Standards Bert Coursey Rad/Nuc Countermeasures Sonya Bowyer SAFECOM Dereck Orr Comparative Studies Larry Morgan U.S. Secret Service Paul Mahon Threat Vulnerability, Testing & Analysis Joe Kielman Studies & Analysis Ron Taylor Approved: Under Secretary McQueary Date: 23 Jan 04 US Coast Guard Joseph Vojvodich

  5. BTS Integrated Product Team Mission Mission Statement Develop and Transition Capabilities that Improve the Security of our Nation’s Borders and Transportation Systems without Impeding the Flow of Commerce and Travelers

  6. BTS Objectives Strategic Objectives • Prevent entry of terrorists, criminals and illegal aliens • Interdict terrorist instruments and contraband at the earliest opportunity • Improve the security of U.S. transportation systems • Facilitate flow of commerce and travelers – identify, disrupt & dismantle entities that threaten the United States

  7. BTS ChallengesAddressing Risk The new security environment requires us to secure our border and transportation infrastructure, not just stem the tide of illegal activities. That is a far more difficult goal and there will never be enough officers to cover the vast areas that must be secured. Vulnerability Examples Unmonitored open border regions Unmonitored inter-modal shipping containers Interruption of Commerce Flow Transportation Security …size and scope of problem Threat Examples Terrorists Instruments of Terror Explosives Smugglers Vehicles/Vessels as Vectors

  8. BTS Challenges (cont’d)Addressing Risk We must find ways to more effectively detect and react to threats to our border and transportation systems officers while facilitating the flow of people and goods The S&T/BTS technology investments are aimed at that goal

  9. BTS Portfolio StrategyBTS Portfolio must be a Systems Integrator Conduit for Technology Portfolios Conduct Studies and Analysis where needed Utilize capabilities where existing or planned Insert Technology into existing BTS programs (i.e. container security) Create new capability if called for (e.g. FAMs) Work with Customers in a collaborative and cooperative environment Involve Industry, Government, Academia Develop a Systems model for overall view

  10. BTS Inputs and SourcesAddressing Capability Gaps and Prioritization • Public Law, Policy Guidance • BTS Portfolio Strategic Technology Planning Process • Bottom-up (operator) input; Top-down (management) validation • Technology Workshops (capability gaps only) • Gaming scenarios

  11. BTS Inputs and Sources (cont’d)Addressing Capability Gaps and Prioritization • Customer input and collaboration • Examples: Container Security, Federal Air Marshals, America’s Shield Initiative, Arizona Border Control Initiative • S&T Requirements Council; BTS Directorate Input; Risk Assessments

  12. BTS/S&T Technology Priorities How do we know S&T is working on highest priority BTS technology needs? • We are told it’s a high priority • We implement a capabilities-based technology planning process • A methodical process that involves Users, Technologists and Senior Management

  13. AnnualValidation by S&T Reqmts Council Capabilities-Based Approach

  14. Border and Transportation Security Operator Point-of-View What Capabilities do We want? And in what Type of Operating Conditions? What Kind of Technology can be applied to address the Capabilities? How do we use the Technology and how does it mesh into the Field? What Areas does S&T Invest In? What is the DHS BTS Technology Vision?

  15. Surveillance and Monitoring Communications and Information Management Targeting and Intelligence Officer Safety Apprehension/ Detention/ Seizure/ Removal Identification and Assessment Training and Proficiency Deterrence BTS Capability Objectives

  16. “Color-coding”the CapabilityObjectives 1. Do BTS operators have the functional capability to provide this operational capability? YES / MARGINAL / NO 2. Are technologies available in the near term to provide this functional capability? YES / MARGINAL / NO 3. What are the technology risks of developing this functional capability? LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH 1 2 3

  17. I&A2. Document Verification & Validity Land Borders North Land Borders South Coastal Areas PAC Coastal Areas ATL Other Water- ways Interior Overseas High Seas POEs • Definition: The capability to examine, assess and determine document authenticity through existing and future data and physical systems. • Existing Programs • Hand-held confirmed laminate viewers • Diffraction grids for scrambled indicia • Photo phones • Secret Service anti-counterfeiting • Embedded security strips • Technology Limitations and Barriers • Training and cost (training intensive)

  18. BTS PortfolioDeveloping Programs • BTS Strategic Technology Planning Process • Operator Workshops • Scenario-based Seminar Gaming • Operator Integrated Product Teams • Intelligence Community input • Scenario-based assessments • BTS Directorate

  19. Portfolio Program Examples Border and Transportation Security • Border Watch • Border Detection Grid • Container Security Program

  20. Current Capability Some radar, seismic and video camera capabilities Prototype fiber optic fence systems America’s Shield Initiative UAV programs Interim Capabilities Develop and prototype next generation of fixed sensors for southern borders Integrate in a tech prototype in Southwest Border First level sensor fusion capabilities First level auto alert and scene understanding Initial air mobile sensors prototypes Desired Capability End-State Border with depth across US with high probability of detection (Pd) and low probability of false alarm (Pfa), accurate track and low latency Automated alerting functions Northern border extensions (different sensors) Integration with NORTHCOM and AMOC Integrated UAV, ground, aircraft real-time sensor fusion system Across CBP, USCG, & ICE LINK-16 – like Residual Risk Integration into ASI Programs Border Detection Grid UAV Program Automated Scene Understanding Border Detection Grid Border Watch Detect Persons and Contraband at Borders and POE’s

  21. Current Capability All containers are assessed using National Targeting Center (NTC) Integrity depends on seals which can be circumvented Targeting depends on manifest data and rule based systems Interim Capabilities A container security device that assures container integrity Reporting through a global tracking and communications system which gives the container travel and history Reliable container communications when the container is blocked from any line-of-sight link when stacked on a ship or in a terminal yard. Desired Capability End-State Revamped end-to-end supply chain with operations with Visibility before stuffing Visibility at the sub-container level Automated detection and targeting of contraband Residual Risk Non-containerized cargoes (bulk) Programs ACSD Marine Asset Tag Tracking System (MATTS)/Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Integration Advanced Material Container Secure Carton Container Security Detect Persons and Contraband at Borders and POE’s

  22. Observations • Operational and Organizational challenges and Fiscal Constraints • Sometimes the best solution is low tech or no tech • Not everyone is Mr. Wizard • Info to the tactical level in a timely manner important to field personnel

  23. Observations (cont’d) • Technology Transition and Lessons Learned (i.e. COP, Blue Force Tracking) • Develop Architectures and Integrate Systems • Broad-based systems view needed • How does technology insertion or process change impact operations, policy? • What are policy implications to technology or process?

  24. Capabilities-Based Tech PlanningWhere We Are Today Capability-Based Planning works for S&T/Border and Transportation Security!

  25. Ms. Jeanne W. LinDirector, BTS PortfolioDepartment of Homeland SecurityScience & Technology DirectoratePlans, Programs and Budgetjeanne.lin@dhs.govEA, Ms. Morgan(202) 254-5742 CONTACTINFORMATION

More Related