1 / 16

Using Biomechanical Testimony Effectively to Combat the Soft Tissue Injury Cases

Using Biomechanical Testimony Effectively to Combat the Soft Tissue Injury Cases. MaryJane Dobbs, Marcus, Brody, Ford, Kessler & Sahner, L.L.C. Roseland, New Jersey June J. Essis, Fineman, Krekstein & Harris, PC , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Pat_Xavi
Télécharger la présentation

Using Biomechanical Testimony Effectively to Combat the Soft Tissue Injury Cases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Biomechanical Testimony Effectively to Combat the Soft Tissue Injury Cases MaryJane Dobbs, Marcus, Brody, Ford, Kessler & Sahner, L.L.C. Roseland, New Jersey June J. Essis, Fineman, Krekstein & Harris, PC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Bradley W. Probst, MSBME, ARCCA Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  2. The Good News By June J. Essis

  3. WHAT DO BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERS DO • Apply engineering principles, the principles of mechanics, to biological systems, i.e., the human body, with the specific facts of an accident • Provide information about forces generated in the accident

  4. LOW IMPACT CASES Testimony has been admitted to establish that the forces generated by the accident were not sufficient to cause the injury alleged.

  5. TESTIMONY IS ADMITTED WHEN . . . • Expert is qualified • Expert has experience and training • Testimony is relevant and reliable • Material generally accepted in scientific community Valentine v. Grossman, 283 A.D.2d 571, 724 N.Y.S.2d 504 (2001)

  6. QUALIFIED TO GIVETESTIMONY IF … • Education • Experience and training • Reviewed facts of the case • Pleadings • Written discovery responses/depositions • Photographs • Accident report • Medical records Ma’ele v. Arrington, 45 P.3d 557 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)

  7. RELIABILITY ISESTABLISHED BY . . . • Setting forth the methodology • Explaining the calculations • Relying on factual events as reported by plaintiff • Reviewing medical articles • Utilizing studies/tests that were conducted by the expert or scientific community Baerwald v. Flores, 930 P.2d 816 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997), certiorari denied, 122 N.M. 589 (1997)

  8. MECHANICAL ENGINEER, MEDICAL DOCTOR AND/OR ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTIONIST Can testify if he/she has: • Education • Experience and/or • Training in Biomechanics

  9. QUALIFIED EXPERT… Can testify about: • Forces involved in the accident • Impact forces have on the human body Cannot testify about: • Plaintiff’s specific claimed injuries

  10. Maybaum v. Rakita, 2002 Ohio 5338 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)

  11. Mitchell v. Glimm, 819 So.2d 548 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002)

  12. Wilson v. Rivers, 593 S.E.2d 603 (S.C. 2004)

  13. STANDARDS FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY No different than the standards for the admissibility of any other expert testimony

  14. IN DETERMINING ADMISSIBILITY, COURTS FOCUS ON . . . 1) The credentials of the expert 2) Whether expert relied on education, experience, training and experiments to arrive at the opinion 3) Whether the testimony is reliable and relevant 4) Whether the methodology generally accepted in the scientific community 5) How the expert arrived at the calculations 6) The material and/or literature utilized 7) Whether the expert reviewed the case material

More Related