1 / 54

Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress

Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. Idaho Reading Indicator (IRI). Grades K-3. Individual reading test administered three times/year. 2007-2008 was a new test and new baseline. Scores: 3 – Benchmark (At Grade Level) 2 – Strategic (Near Grade Level)

Patman
Télécharger la présentation

Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress

  2. Idaho Reading Indicator (IRI) • Grades K-3. • Individual reading test administered three times/year. • 2007-2008 was a new test and new baseline. • Scores: 3 – Benchmark (At Grade Level) 2 – Strategic (Near Grade Level) 1 – Intensive (Below Grade Level) • On Target: • Reach the Spring Benchmark or • Increase the percentage of students meeting Benchmark (3) by 5% from Fall to Spring.

  3. IRI 2009-2010 Kindergarten 14 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for Kindergarten.

  4. IRI 2009-2010 First Grade 11 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for First Grade.

  5. IRI 2009-2010 Second Grade 14 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for Second Grade.

  6. IRI 2009-2010 Third Grade 14 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for Third Grade.

  7. Idaho Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) • Reading, language usage, math in grades 3-10. • Administered annually in the Spring. • Science in grades 5, 7, & 10. • Given on computer. • Used to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP) in the spring. • Passing score required for graduation. • Retest opportunity offered two times each year.

  8. ISAT DATA The first set of graphs show: • The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10, state and district longitudinal data.

  9. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 3rd Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • increase in reading • increase in math • increase in language • District and state average • same in reading • slightly below in • math • slightly below in • language

  10. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 4th Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • same in reading • increase in math • increase in language • District and state average • reading above state • math above state • language above state

  11. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 5th Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • increase in reading • increase in math • increase in language • District and state average • reading above state • math above state • language above state

  12. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 6th Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • slight decrease in reading • slight decrease math • increase in language • District and state average • reading above state • math above state • language above state

  13. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 7th Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • increase in reading • increase in math • increase in language • District and state average • reading above state • math above state • language above state

  14. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 8th Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • increase in reading • increase in language • increase in math • District and state average • reading above state • math above state • language above state

  15. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 9th Grade • 9th Graders were last tested • in Spring 2006 • District and state average • reading slightly below • state • math slightly below • state • language above state

  16. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2010 10th Grade • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • increase in reading • increase in language • slight decrease in math • District and state average • reading above state • math below state • language above state

  17. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2007-2009 Science • Spring 2009 to Spring 2010 • decrease in 5th grade • decrease in 7th grade • increase in 10th grade • District and state average • 5th grade above state • 7th grade above state • 10th grade above state

  18. ISAT DATA The next set of graphs show: • The percent of students proficient in grades 3-10, Spring 2010 school data.

  19. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 3rd Grade

  20. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 4th Grade

  21. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 5th Grade

  22. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 6th Grade

  23. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 7th Grade

  24. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 8th Grade

  25. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 9th Grade

  26. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 10th Grade

  27. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient Spring 2010 Science

  28. ISAT DATA The next set of graphs show: • The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10 based on AYP calculations from the ISAT by sub-groups.

  29. Percent Proficient by Ethnicity

  30. Percent Proficient by Ethnicity

  31. Percent Proficient by Special Programs

  32. Percent Proficient by Special Programs

  33. Graduation Rates

  34. ESEA and AYP The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires that all: • students meet the standards for reading and math by 2014. • schools demonstrate adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward achieving that goal.

  35. ESEA and AYP Each state has set incremental benchmarks to reach 100% proficiency by 2014. • Reading requirement: • 2009-2010: 85.6% students proficient • 2010-2011: 90.4% students proficient • Math requirement: • 2009-2010: 83.0% students proficient • 2010-2011: 88.7% students proficient • Language requirement: • 2009-2010: 75.1% students proficient • 2010-2011: 83.4% students proficient

  36. ESEA and AYP Facts • Eighth year held accountable for Elementary and • Secondary Education Act (ESEA / Adequate Yearly • Progress (AYP). • 41 targets to meet proficiency benchmarks. • Entire student population – or any one of the subgroups – • does not meet targets, school is deemed not to have made • AYP. • AYP is only one measure of a school’s success.

  37. School AYP Accountability

  38. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District AYP Status • Twelve of thirteen elementary schools met AYP. • One elementary school is on alert. • Two elementary schools met AYP, but are in School • Improvement (takes two years to get out of • Improvement status). • No middle schools met AYP, but IMS is being granted • new school status. • Three middle schools are in School Improvement. • No high schools met AYP. • One high school is on alert. • Three high schools are in School Improvement. • Pocatello Community Charter School met AYP.

  39. Chubbuck Elementary Edahow Elementary Ellis Elementary Gate City Elementary Greenacres Elementary Indian Hills Elementary Jefferson Elementary Lewis & Clark Elementary Syringa Elementary Tendoy Elementary Pocatello Community Charter School Elementary Schools that Met AYP (and are not in School Improvement)

  40. Elementary Schools that Met AYP (but are still in School Improvement) • Tyhee Elementary • Improvement 3 Reading • Wilcox Elementary • Improvement 4 Reading

  41. Elementary School On Alert • Washington Elementary • Alert Reading & Math • Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (84.5%) • Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (79.4%)

  42. Middle Schools in School Improvement • Franklin Middle School • Improvement 3 Math • Hispanic or Latino Math Proficiency (75.9%) • Hawthorne Middle School • Improvement 4 Reading*, Improvement 5 Math • Hispanic or Latino Math Proficiency (78.7%) • Kinport Academy • Improvement 4 Math • Total Population Math (43.3% - 3 year average) *HMS met AYP in Reading, but it takes 2 years to get out of Improvement Status

  43. High School on Alert • Century High School • Alert Math • Economically Disadvantaged Math (77%)

  44. High Schools in School Improvement • Highland High School • Improvement 2 Math • Economically Disadvantaged Math (78.2%) • Pocatello High School • Improvement 2 Math, Alert Reading • Economically Disadvantaged Reading (83.2%) • Total Population Math (81.6%) • Economically Disadvantaged Math (70.8%) • New Horizon High School • Improvement 4 Reading & Math • Total Population Reading (68.5 % - 3 year average) • Total Population Math (45.8% - 3 year average)

  45. District AYP Accountability

  46. District Classified in Improvement • Improvement 4 Reading, Improvement 3 Math • Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (70.7%) • Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (63.1%) • Hispanic or Latino Math (81.4%)

  47. What Plans Are Being Made for Improvement? • Continue to focus improvement efforts through the School Improvement planning process (Effective Schools Research) • Continue Total Instructional Alignment (TIA) • Continue Professional Learning Communities • Continue to expand ‘Response to Intervention’ (RtI) model • Continue to expand and offer interventions • Refine and implement model at Secondary level • Continued use of Instructional Reading & Math Coaches • Strengthen the District’s Professional Development Offerings • Research-Based Instructional Strategies • Highly Effective Questioning • Framework for Understanding Poverty • Cultural Perspectives Training • Love & Logic • Refine High School/Middle School Redesign • High School/Middle School Lunch Academies for English and math • After school math tutoring for high school students • Continued use of Academic Success Coaches and Credit Recovery opportunities for high school students

  48. CELEBRATE! We are continuing to “Maximize Learning For All Students Through Rigor, Relevancy, and Relationships” • AYP is one indicator of school success. • The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District was selected for the “What Parents Want” award by School Match • Based on: • competitive test scores • accreditation • recognition for excellence by a national foundation • competitive teacher salaries • average instructional expenditures • library/media services • class size • Only 16% of the nation’s school districts have received this recognition

  49. CELEBRATE! We are continuing to “Maximize Learning For All Students Through Rigor, Relevancy, and Relationships” • Two high school students selected as recipients of a National Merit $2500 US Presidential Scholar award. • Franklin Middle School students took first place team in the regional MATHCOUNTS competition.

More Related