1 / 60

Recent Developments in Networking

Recent Developments in Networking. Networking Resources for Collaborative Research in the Southeast AAAS Research Competitiveness Program Douglas E. Van Houweling DVH@Internet2.edu. Overview. History Today’s Internet Barriers to Progress Advanced Internet Projects Applications

achurchill
Télécharger la présentation

Recent Developments in Networking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent Developmentsin Networking Networking Resources for Collaborative Research in the Southeast AAAS Research Competitiveness Program Douglas E. Van Houweling DVH@Internet2.edu

  2. Overview • History • Today’s Internet • Barriers to Progress • Advanced Internet Projects • Applications • Internet2 -- What Is It? • Network Requirements and Abilene • Global Issues • Trends • Comments & Questions

  3. History • ARPAnet origins • NSFnet • Research and development cycle • Privatization in 1995 • Higher ed planning in 1995/1996 • Are our research and education needs being met by today’s internet? • If not, what should we do?

  4. History, cont. • October 1996 I2 organizing meeting • 34 institutions in attendance; all 34 signed up • Membership commitment • $25,000/year in membership dues • I2 connectivity and campus upgrades

  5. History, cont. • University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development • Established in October 1997 • Parent organization for the Internet2 and Abilene Projects

  6. Today’s Internet • Growing at 10 - 15% per month • Challenges to higher education • The “world wide wait” • Human interaction awkward • Virtual meetings and seminars • Shared authoring • Browsing publications • Distributed large scale computing and data base efforts not feasible

  7. Today’s Internet • Inadequate for mission-critical applications • Authentication • “Best efforts” not good enough • Intranets and Extranets instead • Match capacity and demand • Provide a more secure environment • Don’t reach the public at large, though!

  8. Barriers to Progress • Providers swamped attempting to match capacity to demand • Advanced applications can’t be deployed • No large scale development environment available • Negative-sum competitive environment inhibits investment

  9. Advanced InternetProjects • Next Generation Internet (NGI) • Focused on: • Federal mission agency needs • Maintaining US Internet leadership • Internet2 • Focused on: • Higher education needs • Moving the public Internet to the next level

  10. Advanced InternetProjects • The whole is greater than the sum of the parts • NGI provides partial financial support for university Internet2 projects • Internet2 and NGI coordinate technology development and deployment • Industry has strong incentive to implement resulting capabilities

  11. Application Attributes • Large-scale, multi-site computation and database processing • Real-time access to remote scientific instruments • Interactive research collaboration and instruction • Shared virtual reality • Any combination of the above

  12. 3D Brain Mapping: “Watching the Brain in Action” University of Pittsburgh Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center

  13. Chesapeake Bay Simulation Source: Old Dominion University and University of Illinois-Chicago

  14. Remote Scanning Electron Microscope University of Michigan

  15. PhilipsXL30

  16. American Sign Language and English Captions Gallaudet University Georgetown University

  17. Distributed Image SpreadSheet University of Missouri-Columbia

  18. Upper AtmosphericResearch Collaboratory University of Michigan

  19. Teleimmersion University of Illinois-Chicago University of Illinois-NCSA Old Dominion University

  20. The CAVE Source: University of Illinois-Chicago

  21. Immersadesk Source: University of Illinois-Chicago

  22. Virtual Temporal Bone Source: University of Illinois-Chicago

  23. What it Takes • Engaging the applications developers • Building a network that delivers the end-to-end functionality required by the applications

  24. Internet2:What Is It? • The University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development (UCAID) • The Internet2 Project • The Abilene Project • Future Projects….

  25. UCAID Mission • Provide leadership and direction for advanced networking development within the university community.

  26. UCAID Organization & Budget • University CEO’s are voting representatives for regular members • Structured as an agile organization capable of responding to rapid change. • 3 Councils with Board seats • Applications • Policy & Operations • Network Research • Member dues provide income base

  27. UCAID Board • Chair -- David Ward -- Chancellor, University of Wisconsin/Madison • Henry Bienen -- President, Northwestern University • William Bowen -- President, Mellon Foundation • Molly Corbett Broad -- President, University of North Carolina • Larry Faulkner -- President, University of Texas/Austin • Steven Sample -- President, University of Southern California • Graham Spanier -- President, Penn State University • Gary Augustson -- Chair, Network Planning and Policy Council • Tom DiFanti -- Chair, Applications Strategy Council • Larry Landweber -- Chair, Network Research Liaison Council • Doug Van Houweling -- President and CEO

  28. Membership • Number • 126 Regular, 20 Affiliate, 30 Corporate • open application process • ~$1m/year regular member commitment • Classes • Regular, Affiliate, Corporate • Regular members are only voting class of members

  29. Internet2 Member Universities127 Members as of May 1998

  30. 3Com* Advanced Network & Services* Alcatel Apple Ameritech AT&T* Bay Networks* Bell Atlantic Bellcore Cabletron* Cisco Systems* Deutsche Telekom Digital Equipment Corporation FORE Systems* GTE Internetworking IBM* Lucent Technologies* MCI Communications* Newbridge Networks* Nokia Nortel* Novell Packet Engines Perot Systems Qwest Communications* SBC Technology Resources Siemens Sprint StarBurst Communications* Sun Microsystems Torrent Technologies William Communications Corporate Members/Partners*

  31. Internet2 Mission Facilitate and coordinate the development, deployment, operation and technology transfer of advanced, network-based applications and network services to further U.S. leadership in research and higher education and accelerate the availability of new services and applications on the Internet.

  32. Internet2 Goals • Enable new generation of applications • Re-create leading edge R&E networkcapability • Transfer capability to the global production Internet

  33. Applications Priorities • Focus on content • Educational • Research publications • Mass media -> personalized media • Attack middleware challenge • Seek 100% coverage of interoperable scalable middleware • In collaboration with industry members

  34. Applications and Engineering Applications Motivate Enables Engineering

  35. End-to-end performance guarantees Across multiple providers Application-based performance Authentication & security New business models Performance related pricing Single-Lane Road ->Multi-lane Superhighway Special-purpose lanes Access control Tolls where appropriate Network Requirements

  36. Quality of Service (QoS) Enable advanced applications without brute force Multi-cloud and multi-provider Support for Internet-based broadcast Scalable New middleware: Connect network to application Support application-based charging Authenticate users Support for large delay - bandwidth products Bigger pipes Solutions

  37. Internet2 Values in the QoS area • Support applications • Ensure multi-cloud (multi-carrier) QoS • Ensure multi-vendor (open standards) QoS

  38. Quality of Service Challenge A B • Does the QoS approach support the applications? • Are there implementations that work? Only one? • If cloud ‘A’ and cloud ‘B’ both implement QoS, does the combined A+B catenation implement QoS?

  39. Internet2 Architecture Interconnects: connects all the gigaPoPs to each other GigaPoPs: connect universities to the Interconnects and to other services Universities: upgrade their LANs to more than 500 Mb/s u u gigaPoP Interconnects u u u gigaPoP u gigaPoP gigaPoP u u u u gigaPoP

  40. Project Abilene

  41. Announced 14 April

  42. Abilene and Other Networks • A second Internet2 backbone -- the vBNS is the first. • Intention to establish peering links with other research networks • Working with NSF on connection policies (grant allocation and conditions of use) • Federal networks • International links

More Related