1 / 15

A ROADMAP TO FERC’S STANDARD MARKET DESIGN NOPR

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. A ROADMAP TO FERC’S STANDARD MARKET DESIGN NOPR. Scott Miller Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Boston, MA September 13, 2002. WHY IS THIS NEEDED?. Increasingly Regional Nature of Electricity Trade Residual Discrimination – Independence Issue

acton
Télécharger la présentation

A ROADMAP TO FERC’S STANDARD MARKET DESIGN NOPR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission A ROADMAP TO FERC’S STANDARD MARKET DESIGN NOPR Scott Miller Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Boston, MA September 13, 2002

  2. WHY IS THIS NEEDED? • Increasingly Regional Nature of Electricity Trade • Residual Discrimination – Independence Issue • Minimize “Seams” • Avoid Market Manipulation • Promote Investment in Necessary Infrastructure • gx vs. tx vs. demand response • encourage development of new technology • Lower Costs to Customers • Framework for Effective State & Federal Regulation

  3. PRE-NOPR OUTREACH • RTO Week October 2001 • Follow-on Technical Conferences • Comments on Working Paper and Options Paper • Meeting with major industry segments • Federal/State Commissioner Dialog on RTO issues

  4. PRESERVING STATE PREROGATIVES In addition, we are proposing: Regional State Advisory Committees for policy issues and RTO management and budget review Multi-State Entities for planning, certification, and siting at a regional level Complements recommendation of Task Force to National Governors Association States continue to: Set retail rates Site transmission and generation Deal with local distribution issues

  5. MAJOR ELEMENTS • Independent Transmission Provider • New Transmission Tariff • Transmission Pricing Reform • Organized Day-ahead & Real Time Spot Markets • Mitigation of Market Power/Market Monitoring • Resource Adequacy • Regional Planning Process

  6. Independent Transmission Provider • Operates Transmission Facilities • Administers Transmission Tariff • Administers Organized Spot Market • Same Definition of Independence as in Order No. 2000 • Could be RTO (or some other independent entity)

  7. NEW TRANSMISSION TARIFF • Network Access Service • All Customers Subject to the same terms and conditions of Transmission service • Transition • Customers under OATT – Network Access Service • Bundled retail service – LSE takes Network Access Service to serve these customers • Pre-Order No. 888 contracts – Can convert to network Access service, if not, then LSE takes Network Access Service to serve these customers

  8. TRANSMISSION PRICING • Embedded costs • access charge paid by load • license plate to address cost shifts • LMP Pricing for Congestion Management • Pricing of expansions • With ITP - consider participant funding • Without ITP - presumption will be to roll-in cost of expanding high voltage lines • No Access charges for transactions across RTO Borders (cost allocation remedy for cost shifts)

  9. ORGANIZED SPOT MARKETS • Supplement Long-Term Bilateral Contracts • Day Ahead & Real Time • Implements LMP • Congestion Revenue Rights • Financial right that entitles holder to congestion revenue (enables customer to protect itself from congestion costs) • Initial allocation process will be difficult • Rights of existing customers should be preserved • How do we accommodate unique needs of NW?

  10. MITIGATION MEASURES • Three required Components • Must offer obligation for localized market power • Safety-net bid cap - e.g., $1000 Mwh • Resource adequacy requirement for load • Fourth measure could be used if non-competitive conditions exist • Could limit bids if bid are high due to withholding and not scarcity • Need for measure determined on a regional basis

  11. MARKET MONITORING • NOPR lays out framework • Independent market monitoring unit • Evaluates State of Markets • Identifies need for changes in market rules • Identifies load pockets & areas where infrastructure is needed for competition • Reports to FERC, Regional State Advisory Committee, and Board of Directors • Flexibility to adapt measures to regional market conditions

  12. RESOURCE ADEQUACY REQUIREMENT • Customer protection • Forward-looking requirement developed on a regional basis • Encourages long-term contracts for supply • Avoids “free rider” opportunities • Preserves strong State role in establishing adequate reserve margins

  13. RESOURCE ADEQUACY REQUIREMENT • Annual regional demand forecast by RTO • Minimum 12% reserve margin, region could decide on higher level • Forward looking - e.g. , 3 years in advance • Regional flexibility • LSE that does not satisfy requirement assessed penalties for spot market purchases during shortage

  14. REGIONAL PLANNING PROCESS • Start process within six months to facilitate development of infrastructure • Ground-up process with regional coordination to address loop flow • Four regions to start • ITPs would act as clearinghouse and evaluate alternative proposals

  15. POST-NOPR PROCESS • Comments Due November 15 • Reply Comments Due December 20 • More Technical Conferences • Final Rule Implementation • Sept. 30, 2003 ---- Bundled Retail Under Tariff • Dec. 1, 2003 ---- SMD Compliance Filings • 1 Yr. after Rule ---- Regional Planning • Jan. 31, 2004 ---- Security Standards • Sept. 30, 2004 ---- SMD in effect

More Related