1 / 23

Dr Dilly Fung Head of Academic Development D.Fung@exeter.ac.uk

A ccrediting S taff P rofessionalism I n R esearch-Led E ducation. Dr Dilly Fung Head of Academic Development D.Fung@exeter.ac.uk. About ASPIRE: Development and Principles. A ccrediting S taff P rofessionalism I n R esearch-Led E ducation.

adair
Télécharger la présentation

Dr Dilly Fung Head of Academic Development D.Fung@exeter.ac.uk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Accrediting Staff ProfessionalismIn Research-Led Education Dr Dilly Fung Head of Academic Development D.Fung@exeter.ac.uk

  2. About ASPIRE: Development and Principles

  3. Accrediting Staff Professionalism In Research-Led Education

  4. Principles of ASPIRE at Exeter

  5. About ASPIRE: How does the scheme work for applicants?

  6. Four levels of ASPIREFellowship:mapped to HEA Fellowships Descriptor 4 Able to evidence a sustained and successful track record of impact as strategic leaders and managers, with a particular focus on teaching, learning, assessment and related areas within and beyond own institution.

  7. Fellowships: routes to achievement Descriptors 1 + 2 Descriptors 1, 2, 3, 4

  8. Two routes for claiming an ASPIRE award

  9. Evidence of ‘professional development’ includes:

  10. Feedback • Detailed feedback provided to each candidate, on: • The strengths of their application and professional achievements • Possible future directions to enhance practice (both quality and range) further in the future.

  11. About ASPIRE: How does the University make the scheme work?

  12. Developmental activities

  13. Assuring standards

  14. Discussion

  15. Unexpected benefits

  16. Development of applicants • The individual applicants have engaged in a number of developmental activities in order to prepare their applications, including ASPIRE workshops. They build new support networks, and access new kinds of developmental opportunities. • In receiving detailed feedback from the panel, applicants, whether successful or unsuccessful, receive targeted commendations and advice about future developmental possibilities.

  17. Development of senior staff • A wide range of senior staff involved in ASPIRE assessment panels - becoming very familiar with UKPSF. • An even wider range of staff have become involved as referees – again, promoting familiarity with UKPSF. • ASPIRE has enabled us to set up developmental sessions for all Academic Leads (line managers) -a catalyst for genuine and engaged discussion among senior staff, many of whom are research-focused. This enhanced knowledge can feed into the regular PDR (appraisal) meetings.

  18. Enhancement of other initiatives • Looking at reforming teaching review scheme into a more flexible Peer Dialogue Scheme, more congruent with the ASPIRE scheme. • The University has formally revised its reward and recognition structure for teaching staff, so that colleagues who are on teaching-led contracts can attain full recognition at professorial level if they meet certain criteria. ASPIRE/HEA Fellowships form explicit evidence for colleagues’ claims for progression.

  19. Most notable challenges

  20. Demands resources • Be under no illusions – time, money and collaborative strategic planning are needed to do this well • Stepping out into the unknown - inventing from scratch takes creative energy • Internal publicity strategy: needs to be continually re-worked • Responding to others’ interest in the scheme – great to be asked, but also takes time...

  21. Demands significant leadership qualities • The institution has to have confidence in its own judgements: the scheme (and its leaders) must be accountable • Scheme leaders need to believe in their own values and approaches, even under pressure: need a team approach and a genuine commitment to ongoing evaluation and change • Effective communication is vital, internally and externally.

  22. Discussion

More Related