1 / 22

Feedstock and Soil Sustainability

Feedstock and Soil Sustainability. 2013 meeting, Corvallis, OR Rob Harrison Stephani Michelsen-Correa (PhD) Marcella Menegale (PhD) Jason James (MS) Erika Knight (MS June 2013), Jones & Stokes, AK Austin Himes (MS June 2012), Greenwood Res., OR. Paired Tree Study and 15N. Objectives:

adair
Télécharger la présentation

Feedstock and Soil Sustainability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Feedstock and Soil Sustainability 2013 meeting, Corvallis, OR Rob Harrison Stephani Michelsen-Correa (PhD) Marcella Menegale (PhD) Jason James (MS) Erika Knight (MS June 2013), Jones & Stokes, AK Austin Himes (MS June 2012), Greenwood Res., OR

  2. Paired Tree Study and 15N • Objectives: • Quantify amount of fertilizer N distributed to each ecosystem component and compare among four different types of N fertilizers (3 controlled release) over a 1 year period • Determine the effectiveness of three controlled-release urea fertilizers in minimizing volatilization loss Sites selected from subset of SMC Paired Tree Study

  3. Paired Tree Study and 15N • Objectives: • Quantify amount of fertilizer N distributed to each ecosystem component and compare among four different types of N fertilizers (3 controlled release) over a 1 year period • Determine the effectiveness of three controlled-release urea fertilizers in minimizing volatilization loss Sites selected from subset of SMC Paired Tree Study

  4. SMC Type V paired-tree study sites Soil origin: Red = glacial Blue = volcanic Green = sedimentary

  5. SMC Type V paired-tree study sites Soil origin: Red = glacial Blue = volcanic Green = sedimentary

  6. Deep Soil Carbon & Nitrogen • Progress To Date: • July – August 2012 • Field samples taken from 22 sites in Oregon and Washington. • August – October 2012 • Lab analysis completed. Samples were analyzed for carbon, nitrogen, and bulk density. • November 2012 – July 2013 • Soil carbon data analyzed and modeled. • Results presented at the North American Forest Soils Conference • Paper submitted for publication in the Soil Science Society of America Journal as part of NAFSC Conference Proceedings. • July – September 2013 • Soil nitrogen data analyzed and modeled. • Results will be presented at the Soil Science Society of America Meeting in November 2013.

  7. Deep Soil Carbon & Nitrogen • Methods • 22 study sites in intensively managed plantations across the Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir zone • Excavator used to dig at least 2.5 m deep soil pits • Bulk density samples taken at intervals of: • 0.0-0.2 m • 0.2-0.5 m • 0.5-1.0 m • 1.0-1.5 m • 1.5-2.0 m • 2.0-2.5 m • Forest floor gathered from randomly placed 0.3 x 0.3 m quadrat • Samples analyzed for C & N

  8. kg N/ha 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 Soil depth (cm)

  9. Harvest intensity and competing vegetation control have little effect on soil carbon and nitrogen pools in a Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir plantation Erika J. Knight A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Washington 2013

  10. Figure 3. Mean treatment values for carbon content by depth interval for the vegetation control comparison. Error bars represent the 90% confidence interval around the mean. There were no significant differences between treatments (α=0.10).

  11. Bole-only harvest Whole-tree + ff

  12. Risk to Long-term Site Productivity Due to Whole-tree Harvesting in The Coastal Pacific Northwest Austin Himes thesis work, now working for Greenwood Resources, Forest Science, accepted with rewrite (minor and “no edits”)

  13. Results

  14. Results

More Related