1 / 10

AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report 2006

AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report 2006. Prepared by: Guy Johansen United Technologies Corp September 12, 2006. Team Members Guy Johansen, Lead United Technologies Corp Randy Dougherty ANAB Lori Scheid ANAB Reg Blake BSI Americas Jay Park Northrop Buck Crenshaw NASA

adellt
Télécharger la présentation

AAQG RMC Surveillance Team Report 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AAQG RMCSurveillance Team Report 2006 Prepared by: Guy Johansen United Technologies Corp September 12, 2006

  2. Team Members Guy Johansen, Lead United Technologies Corp Randy Dougherty ANAB Lori Scheid ANAB Reg Blake BSI Americas Jay Park Northrop Buck Crenshaw NASA Peter Kucan PRI Registrar Fred Becker The Registrar Company Spencer Rodgers Spirit Aerosystems

  3. Topics • 2006 Surveillance Schedule • 2007 Surveillance Schedule • 2007 Surveillance Issues • Lessons Learned from 2006 • Summary

  4. 2006 Oversight • Oversight Participants 3 Accreditation Bodies (ANAB, SCC, INMETRO) 36 Certification Bodies 18 AAQG Member Companies • 2006 Completed Oversight Assessments (as of September 12) • Accreditation Bodies • Onsite Office Assessments of AB’s = 1 • Witness Audits of AB = 1 (IAF Peer Evaluation) • Certification Bodies • Onsite Office Assessments of CB’s = 26 • (24 Joint Team Assessments & 2 Independent Assessments) • Witness Audits of CB = 26 • (25 Joint Team Assessments & 1 Independent Assessments)

  5. Certification Body Activity • Comments • 1. 4 OEM's missed CB joint office assessments, 2 independent assessments completed. • 2. 3 OEM’s missed CB joint witness audits, 1 independent audit completed. • OEM’s worked together to resolve 12 scheduling issues. • 72% of CB over sight activity completed.

  6. 2007 Oversight 2007 Oversight Participants 3 Accreditation Bodies (ANAB, SCC, INMETRO) 40 Certification Bodies (up 4 from 2006) 19 AAQG Member Companies (up 1 from 2006) • 2007 Oversight Schedule To be finalized at RMC Meeting in Mystic

  7. 2007 Oversight • 2007 Oversight Assessment Issues • Ensure follow-up of an 2006 independent audit findings. • Determine need for additional audit activity. • If a CB provides multiple AS9100, AS9120, and AS9110 accreditations, need to adjust required witness audits. • Provide uniform training to all participating OEM auditors • Train the Trainer Workshop January 2007, linked to annual over sight meeting. (Based on AS9104/2) • Create questionnaire to obtain Feedback from OEM / AB / CB auditors on over sight process. (scheduling, coordination, training, improvements,.....

  8. Appendix 7 Inputs Lessons Learned from 2006(Preliminary data from Appendix 7 forms submitted to date) • Repeats from 2005 • Not a Process Orientated Audit • Depth of Audit • Audit Time Allowed • OASIS Entry Errors • Scoring Issues • Corrective Action • Potential Issues for 2006 • Objective Evidence for Compliance • CB Internal Audit • CB Management Review of AS Files • Root Cause Analysis • (Need to include ANAB findings/documentation)

  9. 2006 Activities Needed Support form AAQG/RMC OEM Member Contact • Make sure OEM Assessor is aware of assignments • Make sure OEM Assessor is properly trained • Identify any conflicts in schedule and arrange for OEM replacement or independent assessment. • Insure OEM Assessor documents results and submits required reports to Accreditation Body

  10. Summary • Overall performance and participation is very good for 2006. • Need continued support from OEM’s to ensure completion of 2006 schedule. • Need to sustain continuous improvement of the process.

More Related