SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

AP Rubric

adriano avatar
9 diapositives · 322 Views · Jan 10, 2013

AP Rubric. Scoring Your Peer’s Essay Interpreting Your Score. Scoring Criteria. Focus: Is the paper clearly focused? Does it concentrate on a particular topic? Does it maintain its focus throughout the paper? Thesis/Assertions: Does the thesis statement take a position?

AP Rubric - slide 1
01 / 9AP Rubric
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

AP Rubric
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. AP Rubric Scoring Your Peer’s Essay Interpreting Your Score

  2. Scoring Criteria • Focus: • Is the paper clearly focused? • Does it concentrate on a particular topic? • Does it maintain its focus throughout the paper? • Thesis/Assertions: • Does the thesis statement take a position? • Is the position arguable? • Does the position reflect a mature understanding of the topic? • Evidence: • Does the author use evidence from supporting sources? • Supporting sources may include quotes, paraphrases, summaries, etc. • Does it use specific and meaningful quotes? • Analysis/Commentary: • Does the commentary link the quote back to the thesis statement? • Is it insightful? • Is it useful? Does it add to the audience’s understanding or clarify a concept? • Language/Control of Writing: • Does the author display a mature level of vocabulary? • Is the piece clear, free of awkward wording or distracting errors in diction and syntax? • Is the piece free of major/distracting errors in grammar and punctuation?

  3. Point Values: 8-9 THESIS: Thoughtful and Mature • The maturely written response clearly focuses on the topic and effectively employs substantial supporting evidence. • Accurately and insightfully focuses on the topic • Refers to specific examples and clearly connects them to the topic • Demonstrates an ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing EVIDENCE: Specific, clearly connected FOCUS: Accurate and Insightful ANALYSIS: Relates Examples to Topic LANGUAGE: Impressive, Mature, Free of errors, Varied Style Insightful/Mature: 8-9

  4. Point Values: 6-7 FOCUS: Clear ANALYSIS: Sufficient • The well-written response clearly focuses on the topic and adequately uses supporting evidence. • Uses some examples to support ideas and adequately connects them to the topic • Clearly develops a position • Demonstrates a clear prose style THESIS: Clearly Developed EVIDENCE: Adequate, well chosen examples LANGUAGE: Clear, with minor lapses, style may be a little dull Clear/Sufficient: 6-7

  5. Point Values: 5 and Below FOCUS: Weak, simplistic; may substitute a simpler task EVIDENCE: Vague, superficial, unrelated • The adequately written response usually focuses on the topic and includes some supporting evidence but may be inconsistent and simplistic in its explanations. • Uses examples which may be vague, superficial, or unrelated to the topic • Weakly focuses on topic, discussion may be unrelated to evidence • Adequately written but may demonstrate inconsistent control of language • Sufficiently written to convey the writer’s ideas, but may have weak control over diction, syntax, grammar, spelling or organization THESIS: Restates or summarizes, position may be unclear ANALYSIS: Vague, or unrelated to evidence or assertions Not Yet! 5 or lower LANGUAGE: Immature/ Lack of control

  6. Point Values 8-9 • The maturely written response clearly focuses on the topic and effectively employs substantial supporting evidence. • Accurately and insightfully focuses on the topic • Refers to specific examples and clearly connects them to the topic • Demonstrates an ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing Insightful/Mature: 8-9

  7. Point Values 6-7 • The well-written response clearly focuses on the topic and adequately uses supporting evidence. • Uses some examples to support ideas and adequately connects them to the topic • Clearly develops a position • Demonstrates a clear prose style Clear/Sufficient: 6-7

  8. Point Values 5 or Lower • The adequately written response usually focuses on the topic and includes some supporting evidence but may be inconsistent and simplistic in its explanations. • Uses examples which may be vague, superficial, or unrelated to the topic • Weakly focuses on topic, discussion may be unrelated to evidence • Adequately written but may demonstrate inconsistent control of language • Sufficiently written to convey the writer’s ideas, but may have weak control over diction, syntax, grammar, spelling or organization Not Yet! 5 or lower

  9. Point Values to Grade Translation • 8 or 9: 98 • 6 or 7: 89 • Not Yet: must be rewritten. • Due no later than Friday • Handwritten • Stapled to back of original, with comment sheet • You will have two opportunities to rewrite, after which point you will receive a grade based on the full AP rubric • 5: 79 • 4: 73 • 3: 65 • 2: 60 • 1: 55