1 / 18

Agenda

Agenda. STATE HIGH PROJECT PLANNING MEETING October 28, 2013. Revised Option 1 Floor Plans Site Plan Revised Option 2 Floor Plans Site Plan Project Examples Option 1 vs. 2 Characteristics Preliminary LEED Checklist. Crabtree, Rohrbaugh & Associates, Architects.

ady
Télécharger la présentation

Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agenda STATE HIGH PROJECT PLANNING MEETING October 28, 2013 Revised Option 1 Floor Plans Site Plan Revised Option 2 Floor Plans Site Plan Project Examples Option 1 vs. 2 Characteristics Preliminary LEED Checklist Crabtree, Rohrbaugh & Associates, Architects

  2. State High - Option -1 Composite Floor Plan

  3. State High - Option -1 Renovation New Construction Composite Floor Plan

  4. State High - Option -1 Potential Potential

  5. State High - Option - 2 Composite Floor Plan

  6. State High - Option - 2 Renovation New Construction

  7. State High - Option -2 Potential Potential

  8. Option Characteristics State High Option - 2 State High Option - 1 Area of Demolition near equal. Area of Renovation near equal. Anticipate Option 2 will be more efficient.

  9. Project Commons

  10. Large Group Instruction

  11. Food Court / Cafe

  12. Food Court / Cafe

  13. Outdoor Student Spaces

  14. State High - Option -1 • Concentrates construction to grass area • Impact to play field area • Program adjacency distance • Building organization • Simplified Phasing • Larger building area / sf • Does not accommodate loop road

  15. State High - Option -2 • Concentrates construction to parking area • Impact to parking • Preferred program adjacency • Optimum building organization • Comparable Phasing • Smaller building area • Site circulation achieves connection between North and South, Community Fields • Continuous loop road for buses

  16. Preliminary LEED Checklist

  17. Community Connectivity

  18. Questions and Comments

More Related