SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Intellectual Property

aerona avatar
14 diapositives · 374 Views · Dec 21, 2012

Intellectual Property. Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2. Doctrine of Equivalents. Tests Substantially same function, way, result Insubstantial differences Evidence Circumstances, purpose, prior art Would PHOSITA have viewed interchangeable? Details

Intellectual Property - slide 1
01 / 14Intellectual Property
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Intellectual Property
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 5, 2007 Patent – Infringement 2

  2. Doctrine of Equivalents • Tests • Substantially same function, way, result • Insubstantial differences • Evidence • Circumstances, purpose, prior art • Would PHOSITA have viewed interchangeable? • Details • All-elements rule • Measured at time of infringement

  3. Patent No. 5,205,473

  4. Patent No. 5,205,473 • “What is claimed is: • 1. A recyclable, insulating beverage container holder, comprising: • a corrugated tubular member comprising • cellulosic material and at least a first opening therein for receiving and retaining a beverage container, said corrugated tubular member comprising • fluting means for containing insulating air; said fluting means comprising fluting adhesively attached to a liner with a recylable adhesive

  5. Doctrine of Equivalents • Limitations • Claim on prior art • Prosecution history estoppel • Disclosed but not claimed

  6. ? Warner Jenkinson Hilton Original Hilton Amended Booth Warner pH 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0

  7. Festo • Two issues • What kinds of amendments trigger estoppel? • Does estoppel apply to all equivalents based on the amendment?

  8. Equivalents for Minor Invention Prosecution History Estoppel Equivalents for Pioneer Invention Prior Art Doctrine of Equivalents Claims

  9. Patent No. 5,205,473

  10. Patent No. 5,205,473 • “What is claimed is: • 1. A recyclable, insulating beverage container holder, comprising: • a corrugated tubular member comprising • cellulosic material and at least a first opening therein for receiving and retaining a beverage container, said corrugated tubular member comprising • fluting means for containing insulating air; said fluting means comprising fluting adhesively attached to a liner with a recylable adhesive

  11. Patent No. 5,425,497

  12. Problem 3-11 • “1. A pocket toothbrush having an exterior structure resembling a traditional fountain pen case comprising • a. a removable cylindrical end cap cover, • b. a main cylindrical body shaft over at least one end of which said end cap cover fits …, • c. said cylindrical body shaft having one end which contains toothbrush bristles …, • d. said cylindrical body shaft including an interior passage extending into said bristle end and having at least one termination opening in the area at the base of said bristles, • e. a movable plunger extending into said cylindrical body shaft in said main cylindrical body shaft, • f. said body shaft including an interior space for the accommodation of a charge of toothpaste to be fed to said bristles by operation of said movable plunger …”

  13. Administrative • Assignment for next class • Finish IV.C – Infringement • No class this Friday • Will reschedule

  14. Prosecution History Estoppel Equivalents Prior Art Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents Patent Scope Claims