1 / 47

October 19, 2010

October 19, 2010. 2010 School Committee Presentation. I t d e p e n d s …. How did we do?. 2010 School Committee Presentation. Brockton AYP 2010 Results. T h e C h a l l e n g e o f A Y P : R i s i n g T a r g e t s. MCAS ELA Performance Targets. State. BPS.

afi
Télécharger la présentation

October 19, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. October 19, 2010 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools

  2. It depends… How did we do? Brockton Public Schools

  3. 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools

  4. Brockton Public Schools

  5. Brockton AYP 2010 Results Brockton Public Schools

  6. TheChallengeofAYP:RisingTargets Brockton Public Schools

  7. MCAS ELA Performance Targets State BPS Brockton Public Schools

  8. MCAS Math Performance Targets State BPS Brockton Public Schools

  9. 21 Ways to Miss AYP 3Categories 7 Targets A + (B or C) + D = AYP North Middle School Math Brockton Public Schools

  10. AYPAccomplishments Brockton Public Schools

  11. AYP Challenges Brockton Public Schools

  12. Changes Brockton Public Schools

  13. Brockton Public Schools

  14. ELA CPI: Three Different LevelsThree Different Stories Brockton Public Schools

  15. ELA CPI AggregateBPSvs. State State 9.8 9.3 BPS Brockton Public Schools

  16. ELA CPI by Grade Band 2010 -2.4 5 Gain -2 7.3 Gain +1 -1.2 Decline Brockton Public Schools

  17. 2006-10 ELA CPI Gain/Loss by Grade Level 5.8 Gain 6.7 Gain Elementary Losses Small Gain Secondary Grade Gains Brockton Public Schools

  18. 2010 ELA Gains + 2.4 + .4 + 1 Brockton Public Schools

  19. Grade 3 ELA Reversal? 2010 Outgains State 2.4 Gain 3.2 Gain -2.4 Loss 5.6 Gain BPS State Brockton Public Schools

  20. Grade 8 ELA 1 Year Regression: 5 Year Positive Trend -4.4 13.2 8.8 Gain Brockton Public Schools

  21. 2010 ELA CPA Aggregate .3 Gap 9.8 Gap Brockton Public Schools

  22. ELA Subgroup Gain 2006-10 BPSvsState 10.8 2.4 Brockton Public Schools

  23. 2010 ELA Subgroup BPS vsState 75.1 Brockton Public Schools

  24. BPSvsStateSWD 2006-10 ELA Gain: Why We Drill Down Elementary Down Secondary Higher Brockton Public Schools

  25. Math CPI AggregateBPS vs. State State 13 11.6 BPS Brockton Public Schools

  26. Math CPI by Grade Band 2010 -.6 9.4 Gain -.6 4 Gain +.2 9.8 Gain Brockton Public Schools

  27. Gain/Loss 2006-10 by Grade Level Larger Gains + 3.5 + 7 Smaller Gains Gains + .6 Decline Brockton Public Schools

  28. 2010 Math Gains +.1 +.5 Area of Concern Brockton Public Schools

  29. Grade 3 Math 1 Year Improvement:Overall Trend is Down 2006-10 3.9 Loss 1 Year 1.7 Gain Brockton Public Schools

  30. 2010 Math CPI Aggregate 1.9 Gap 13 Gap Brockton Public Schools

  31. Math Subgroup Gain 2006-10 BPSvsState LEP Brockton Public Schools

  32. 2010 Math Subgroup BPSvsState Brockton Public Schools

  33. BPSvsStateSWD 2006-10 Grade Level Gain Overall Gain Elementary Concerns Secondary Gains Brockton Public Schools

  34. 2006-2010 Trends Brockton Public Schools

  35. Brockton Public Schools

  36. State Growth Model: Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Brockton Public Schools

  37. Growth to grade 7: Three students • Academic Peer Groups English language arts Grade 5 2008 Grade 6 2009 Grade 7 2010 SGP 20010 Peter 230 234 230 35 Paul 248 246 244 25 Mary 214 214 226 92

  38. 35 Interpreting Student Growth Percentiles Peter’s SGP was 35. His score was higher than 35% of his academic peers (and lower than 65%). • Is that amount of growth typical? Lower growth Typical growth Higher growth Percent of students Brockton Public Schools

  39. Seeking the Northeast Quadrant Per formance Growth (SGP) Brockton Public Schools

  40. ELA Scatterplot Pe r f o rmance Growth Brockton Public Schools

  41. Math Scatterplot Pe r f o rmance Growth Brockton Public Schools

  42. ELA SGP Brockton Public Schools

  43. Math SGP Brockton Public Schools

  44. 2008-10 SGP Trend Summary Brockton Public Schools

  45. Conclusions Brockton Public Schools

  46. Brockton Public Schools Data Presentation 2010 October 19, 2010 Dr. Ethan R. Cancell School Committee Mayor Linda M. BalzottiChair Ward One Thomas J. Minichiello, Jr. Vice-Chair Ward Two Richard E. Bath Ward Three Janice A. Beyer Ward Four Patricia A. Joyce Ward Five William Carpenter Ward Six James M. Daley Ward Seven Timothy J. Sullivan SuperintendentMatthew H. Malone, Ph.D. Secretary Brockton Public Schools

  47. END 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools

More Related