1 / 10

A Discussion Paper on Standard Harmonization

A Discussion Paper on Standard Harmonization. GRSC-1 (Ottawa) April 2003. Content. Standard Organisations - FWA/BWA Interoperability Look at Resulting Standards Possible Causes for Differences Impact of non-harmonization Towards Harmonization – Current Methods

afra
Télécharger la présentation

A Discussion Paper on Standard Harmonization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Discussion Paper on Standard Harmonization GRSC-1 (Ottawa) April 2003

  2. Content • Standard Organisations - FWA/BWA Interoperability • Look at Resulting Standards • Possible Causes for Differences • Impact of non-harmonization • Towards Harmonization – Current Methods • Improved Harmonization - Possible Avenues GSC-8, OTTAWA

  3. Standard OrganisationsFWA/BWA Interoperability Still active • IEEE 802.16 • ETSI BRAN HIPERACCESS & HIPERMAN Now inactive • BWIF • W-DSL GSC-8, OTTAWA

  4. IEEE 802.16a Three modes (OFDM, OFDMA and SC) Optional mesh mode Cover licensed and licence-exempt cases 2kFFT OFDMA ETSI BRAN HIPERMAN One main mode (OFDM) OFDMA option Optional mesh mode Uplink OFDM sub-chanelization Currently OFDMA option using 256FFT only FEC using Reed-Solomon concatenated with convolutional code (RS-CC) Optional BTC Look at Resulting Standards GSC-8, OTTAWA

  5. Possible Causes for Differences • Different membership • Different premises • International as opposed to regional or national organization • Different voting structures GSC-8, OTTAWA

  6. Impact of non-harmonization • Participation of companies and persons to multiple organizations ($, time, resources) • Reduced volume of equipment • Higher cost • Mixed signals to the market (Who’s right?) GSC-8, OTTAWA

  7. Towards HarmonizationCurrent Methods • Liaison officers • Liaison statements • Groups of interest participating in multiple standard organizations (i.e. OFDM Forum, TDD Coalition, etc.) • Co-located meetings GSC-8, OTTAWA

  8. Improved Harmonization - Possible Avenues (1) • Strong operator/user participation (at least for the development of the system requirements) • Commitment from the operator/user • Groups of interest invited to participate within the ”official” standard organizations (incl. industry forums) • Consider migration paths from proprietary solutions to standard solutions • Consider phasing the future enhancements (do not try to do everything the first time) GSC-8, OTTAWA

  9. Standard Organization A Standard Organization B Joint Standard Development Group One or more output (i.e. considering regional regulation, market peculiarities, etc.) Improved Harmonization - Possible Avenues (2) GSC-8, OTTAWA

  10. Possible Avenues for Improved Harmonization (3) ??? GSC-8, OTTAWA

More Related