1 / 25

a test of transferability: the sE florida activity-based model

14 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013, Columbus, Ohio . a test of transferability: the sE florida activity-based model. Rosella Picado Parsons Brinckerhoff. Background.

agrata
Télécharger la présentation

a test of transferability: the sE florida activity-based model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 14th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013, Columbus, Ohio a test of transferability:the sEflorida activity-based model Rosella Picado Parsons Brinckerhoff

  2. Background • Southeast Florida is home to 5.5 million people, spanning Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties • Relatively disperse travel patterns with significant congestion on Turnpike and north-south freeways • Growing interest in improving transit, expand toll and managed lane infrastructure, mitigate adverse EJ impacts • Trip-based model reaching its limits, especially regarding variably-priced tolling, fare policies, spatial detail, EJ analysis

  3. SE Florida ABM • Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity-based Modeling Platform Family of ABMs • Main features: • Explicit intra-household interactions • Continuous temporal dimension (half-hour time periods) • Fine spatial dimension (12,000 MAZs) • Faithful transit access coding • Distributed values of time • Integration of location, time-of-day, and mode choice models

  4. Model Development Strategy • Transfer the San Diego ABM • Adopt CT-RAMP structure and sub-models • Adopt model parameters estimated with San Diego household survey data • Update certain models to reflect SE Florida conditions: • input data availability (employment, population controls) • modal supply • trip assignment methods • ancillary models • Calibrate models to SE Florida travel patterns • Re-specify models that fail to perform well

  5. Why Model Transfer? • Schedule: • To use the ABM in the development of the 2013 Long Range Transportation Plan • Approximately 18 months available for model development was insufficient time to estimate & validate all models • Data: • Quantity and quality of NHTS SE Florida sample may preclude statistically significant estimation of some models and/or population effects • Largely sufficient for calibration, with caveats

  6. Data Limitations • Small sample size – 2,000 households • Some subareas within model region under-represented • Retired households over-sampled • College students and children under-represented • Missing data, ‘ungeocodable’ activity locations, etc. • Incomplete transit on-board survey

  7. Assessing the Model Transfer Outcome • Evaluate initial estimated travel patterns against model calibration targets • Regional targets for important person markets • Sub-regional where data allow • Assess the magnitude of constant or parameter adjustments to match targets • Importance of model calibration targets • Based on NHTS and supplemented with other sources • Evaluated for reasonableness • Compared to targets from other regions

  8. Work Location Model - initial results Tour Frequency (%)

  9. Work Location Model - calibrated Tour Frequency (%)

  10. School Location Model - initial Tour Frequency (%)

  11. School Location Model - calibrated Tour Frequency (%)

  12. Eating Out Location Model - initial Tour Frequency (%)

  13. Daily Activity Pattern Model

  14. Daily Activity Pattern Model

  15. Non-Mandatory Tour Frequency Calibrated Estimated Tour Frequency (%) Initial

  16. Non-Mandatory Tour Frequency Estimated Tour Frequency (%) Calibrated Initial

  17. Work Departure and Arrival Times Initial

  18. Shop Tour Departure Time Initial

  19. Shop Tour Departure Time Calibrated

  20. Work Tour Mode Choice

  21. Work Ahead • Finalize model calibration • Validation to traffic counts and transit boardings • Future year forecast and sensitivity tests

  22. Conclusions / Lessons Learned • SANDAG CT-RAMP ABM is able to reproduce most regional travel patterns in SE Florida • Largest differences between observed and initial model forecasts: • non-mandatory tour location • CDAP and tour frequency for college students, part-time workers, pre-school children • Modest constant adjustments sufficient to calibrate the model

  23. Conclusions / Lessons Learned • Supplemental data sources important to validate calibration targets and selected model outputs • Unable to observe transferability at high levels of disaggregation

  24. Acknowledgments • Shi-Chiang Li, Florida DOT • Paul Larsen, Palm Beach MPO • Paul Flavien, Broward MPO • Larry Foutz, HNTB (formerly Miami-Dade MPO) • Ken Kaltenbach, The Corradino Group • Sung-Ryong Han, BCC Engineering • Bill Davidson, Ben Stabler, Jinghua Xu

  25. Questions? Rosella Picado Parsons Brinckerhoff Seattle, WA picado@pbworld.com | (206) 382-5227

More Related