1 / 17

West Chester University Review by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE)

West Chester University Review by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE). What is MSCHE?.

ahava
Télécharger la présentation

West Chester University Review by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. West Chester University Review by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE)

  2. What is MSCHE? • The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and improvement through accreditation via peer evaluation. Middle States accreditation instills public confidence in institutional mission, goals, performance, and resources through its rigorous accreditation standards and their enforcement.

  3. Accreditation assures that • TEACHING includes analytical, communication, and other basic “lifelong learning” college skills, expertise in the “major” field, and additional courses needed for the type of education it offers. Students’ learning is assessed. • FEDERAL FUNDS FOR STUDENTS are available to students of colleges accredited by federally recognized accreditors. • RESOURCES, FUNDING AND SERVICES are available as needed, such as faculty, equipment, and student services. • CREDIT TRANSFER AND DEGREE ACCEPTANCE BY EMPLOYERS and OTHER COLLEGES will probably be facilitated because a college’s accreditation is usually considered. • MANAGEMENT is performed by appropriate staff. • EXPERTS are used in reviewing the college, such as professors and college presidents.

  4. It’s a cyclical thing • Full self-study once every 10 years; decision on reaccreditation. • Five-years after accreditation decision, a Periodic Review Report to report on progress since accreditation decision.

  5. Organizational Structure of the WCU self-study process • Steering Committee of faculty and staff • Steering Committee members chaired the nine working groups of faculty, staff and students to research the self-study outcomes and gather evidence of how the institution meets the accreditation standards

  6. Accreditation StandardsInstitutional Context • 1. Mission and Goals • 2. Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal • 3. Institutional Resources • 4. Leadership and Governance • 5. Administration • 6. Integrity • 7. Institutional Assessment

  7. Accreditation StandardsEducational Effectiveness • 8. Student Admissions and Retention • 9. Student Support Services • 10. Faculty • 11. Educational Offerings • 12. General Education • 13. Related Educational Activities • 14. Assessment of Student Learning

  8. Purpose of the Self-Study Process • Affirm the University’s Mission; assess alignment with the Plan for Excellence; lay groundwork for the new strategic plan • Document Institutional Policies and Procedures • Identify Strengths and Challenges • Make Recommendations for Improvement

  9. Communicating the Self-Study Report • The Creating a Shared Vision website, www.wcupa.edu/sharedvision/middlestates, a centralized forum to communicate to the university community about the self-study process, and the work of other task forces and working groups related to the University’s vision for the future.

  10. Evaluation Team Site Visit • March 21 - 23, 2011 • Nine team members representing expertise in discrete areas of higher education • PASSHE representative • Site visit will end with an oral report by the Chair of the Evaluation Team • Written report; opportunity to review and comment • MSCHE reviews all team reports in this cycle in June 2011

  11. Conclusions and Recommendations

  12. Distributed Leadership • Assess the understanding and implementation of, effectiveness of, and accountability for distributed leadership across divisions. Following this investigation, develop a communication plan to make clear how distributed leadership can best function to serve our students and the University across all divisions.

  13. Budget Process • Refine the budgeting process in order to strengthen the link among planning, assessment, and resource allocation; provide greater flexibility for WCU to move resources across divisions; and address the accumulation of surplus rollover revenue in order to allocate to emerging needs.

  14. Institutional Assessment • Create an institutional assessment structure with clearly specified goals, measures, procedures, and outcomes for all units, as well as a mechanism for communicating results and subsequent actions based on assessment results. Assessment of student learning and student support services would be one component of this structure for assessing institutional effectiveness.

  15. Academic Advising • Improve academic advising for all students (undergraduate, graduate, transfer, and nondegree).

  16. Faculty Development • Ensure sufficient support for faculty scholarship and teaching.

  17. What can you do? • Read (at least some of) the self-study • Executive Summary • Conclusions and recommendations • The standards that speak to your “area” • Become familiar with the recommendations • Participate in meetings as scheduled with individual team members (schedule in development now) • Attend open forums with members of the evaluation team

More Related