1 / 12

Ohio River Monitoring and Assessment

Ohio River Monitoring and Assessment. Program Overview. ORSANCO Established in 1948. Total Budget - $40,000 2 Employees – Executive Director, Administrative Assistant Headquarters Office Support of Commissioner Travel Not enough $$ to do any monitoring.

aideen
Télécharger la présentation

Ohio River Monitoring and Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ohio River Monitoring and Assessment Program Overview

  2. ORSANCO Established in 1948 • Total Budget - $40,000 • 2 Employees – Executive Director, Administrative Assistant • Headquarters Office • Support of Commissioner Travel • Not enough $$ to do any monitoring

  3. Monitoring in the 1950s: the Water Users Network • ORSANCO requested data from utilities and industries that monitored the river at their intakes. • Approximately 30 participants • Mostly physical parameters: Temp, pH, turbidity, hardness • No cost to ORSANCO • Parameters and monitoring frequency varied • No QC

  4. Monitoring in the 1960s:Electronic Monitors • Technology developed in the late 50s with a Cincinnati electronics firm. • 4 primary parameters (Temp, pH, DO, Conductivity) • Additional parameters at times – chloride, sri, orp • Network consisted of 24 sites at its peak

  5. Monitoring in the 1970s:Increased federal support • 106 grant nearly doubled Commission resources. • States decided to charge ORSANCO with monitoring and assessment of the Ohio River and lower reaches of major tributaries • Monitoring Strategy Team: states, US EPA, USGS, US COE • Ambient network: 36 sites (22 Ohio River, 14 tributary)

  6. Monitoring in the 1970s: Fish Studies • Aquatic Life studies conducted in the 1960s, but not continued as routine program. • Lock Chamber studies begun in 1975 as ongoing effort. • Fish tissue analysis added in 1976.

  7. Monitoring in the 1980s:Toxics Concerns • Organics Detection System established to monitor for unreported spills. • Increased resources for fish tissue analysis. • Special studies of portions of the river with high incidence of toxics.

  8. Monitoring in the 1990s:Concern with Specific Use Protection • Electrofishing and macroinvertebrate sampling added to improve assessment of aquatic life support. • Bacteria monitoring redesigned to allow assessment of contact recreation support. • Wet weather studies in three urban areas • Atrazine monitoring for drinking water protection.

  9. Monitoring in the 21st Century: Incorporatingnew technologies • High volume sampling • Mobile lab – use of Colilert • Additional pathogen analyses • Studies of emerging contaminants with US EPA, USGS

  10. Current and Recent special studies • Nutrients and Algae • Total Dissolved Solid and Mineral Constituents • Mercury

  11. Keys to Success • Commitment to good science • Dedicated resources • Collaboration

More Related