1 / 18

September 20 th 2014 Case Study

September 20 th 2014 Case Study. Observed increases seen in Ozone (MTMET; Sept 20 th ) and PM 2.5 (Hawthorne; Sept 19-21) measurements, wildfire related?. Significant wildfire activity being observed across central and northern California (Kings fire #10 by Lake Tahoe the largest of these).

alameda-garza
Télécharger la présentation

September 20 th 2014 Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. September 20th 2014 Case Study

  2. Observed increases seen in Ozone (MTMET; Sept 20th) and PM2.5 (Hawthorne; Sept 19-21) measurements, wildfire related?

  3. Significant wildfire activity being observed across central and northern California (Kings fire #10 by Lake Tahoe the largest of these)

  4. MODIS visible image of the King wildfire • Significant canopy vegetation in this region, probably lots of emissions

  5. California wildfires could have impacts on SLC air quality though previous work has shown that these wildfires generally have smaller impacts (on average)

  6. NOAA Hazard Mapping System Fire and Smoke Product suggests that some smoke could be making it to SLC, though this isn’t necessarily the most robust case I’ve seen from this product…

  7. Source: http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/land/hms.html

  8. Source: http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/land/hms.html

  9. What does STILT think?STILT is a Backward Lagrangian Dispersion model which was driven by 12-km NAM wind fields for this particular caseThe following analysis uses the STILT footprint which measures the upstream “surface” influences on air that eventually arrives at SLC (which is our receptor)

  10. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  11. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  12. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  13. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  14. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  15. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  16. *Note that UDAQ time in LST so apply 6-hour offset! King Wildfire

  17. Conclusions • California wildfires likely had an impact for the September 20th episode • Footprints over California weaker though if the magnitude of the emissions are significant enough (i.e large enough fire), these fire can have an impact on the air arriving at SLC • Something to keep in mind is that the King fire likely has a sufficiently large heat flux which may be injecting emissions into the troposphere (a more common trait of large canopy fires) • Plume rise issue, which is currently not parameterized in STILT footprints… yet! • PM2.5 increase can also be potentially explained by fires, though the initial large increase likely came from a different source as the footprint was orientated in a southerly direction during this time • Speciated PM2.5 data could confirm the source. The southerly wind direction makes me think this could be dust? A more thorough analysis is needed to confirm this.

More Related