1 / 29

Writing a good manuscript

Writing a good manuscript. Lena Qiying Ma Professor Biogeochemistry of Trace Metals. Soil and Water Science Department University of Florida. A scientific paper . Title Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussions Conclusions Acknowledgement References. Title.

albert
Télécharger la présentation

Writing a good manuscript

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Writing a good manuscript Lena Qiying Ma Professor Biogeochemistry of Trace Metals Soil and Water Science Department University of Florida

  2. A scientific paper • Title • Abstract • Introduction • Methods • Results • Discussions • Conclusions • Acknowledgement • References

  3. Title • Fewest words to describe the content • Avoid • A study of • Investigations of • Observations on • Include • A particular species • A region www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/ug/research/paper.html

  4. Title • Statement of the question or problem • How smoking affects students’ grade? • Specific enough to describe the contents or subject matter but not too technical • Effect of smoking on academic performance • Summarizing the results can be effective • Students who smoke get lower grades www.biochem.arizona.edu/marc/sci-writing.pdf

  5. Abstract • Short summary of the paper • Purpose • Methods • Results • Conclusions • Include likely “search words” • Less technical than the article • Don't use abbreviations or citations • Avoid use of “in this paper” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/ug/research/paper.html

  6. Abstract • A shortened version of a paper • Most read section of a paper • Contain all information necessary for the reader to determine: • The objectives of the study-Introduction; • How the study was done-Methods; • What results were obtained-Results & Discussions; • The significance of the results-Conclusion. • Write the abstract last http://classweb.gmu.edu/biologyresources/ writingguide/scientificpaper.htm

  7. Introduction • Provide • Background information • Significance of the problem • Lead reader to understand the hypothesis and means of testing it • Provide the context for your investigation • State the question and hypothesis • Hypothesis = tentative explanation • Research is to prove a hypothesis false http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/ug/research/paper.html

  8. Introduction • Introduction • Discuss how the data will add knowledge to the field • What specific questions you tried to address • Don’t introduce literature in general terms: need to be informative • Why is this study of scientific interest and what is your objective • Move from general to specific information • The last sentences should be a statement of objectives and a statement of hypotheses owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/559/03/ web.archive.org/web/20011127041109/www.hms.harvard.edu/fdd/comm/index.html

  9. Introduction • Creates a context for the paper • Plants are constantly exposed to a myriad of environmental and biological stresses • States a question or poses a problem • How plants respond to drought stress is of major concern, not only to researchers but also to farmers • Indicates the consequences and importance of the question • By understanding the biochemical and physical changes induced by drought, researchers may be more able to target processes which could enhance drought tolerance • Presents a hypothetical answer or course of action • It is likely that no single factor is responsible for conferring drought tolerance in plants but that it is an integrative process involving a number of signaling pathways http://www.ucalgary.ca/~natsci/writing/intro.shtml

  10. Methods • Report what you did to repeat the findings • No laundry list • Assume readers have the same basic skills • Target graduate students • Last paragraph provides statistical tests used http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/559/03/

  11. Results • Focus on • Describe the results in sufficient details to establish their validity • Identify the novel aspects of the results • What is new and what makes it non-obvious; • Identify the significance of the results • Implicated improvements and impact. • Things to avoid • Do not include the same data in a table and a figure • Too much motivational material • Describe obvious results • Describe unnecessary details http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/etc/writing-style.html

  12. Results • General approach • Briefly describe experiment without details • A sentence or two • Report main results • Representative: most common • Best case: best example of ideal or exception • Additional tips • Order multiple results logically • Most to least important • Simple to complex • Organ by organ, chemical class by chemical class http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/marc/sci-writing.pdf

  13. General rules for figures • Must have a caption • Using a capitalized name • Figure 1. Ethylene glycol process flow sheet • Should stand alone as much as possible • Compare multiple plots, put them on one graph • If the result is too cluttered, use different graphs • Keep the scales consistent to compare • Use different symbols and line types to distinguish multiple plots on the same graph • Include error bars • Use "scatter" or "x-y" plots, not "line" plots http://www.ent.ohiou.edu/~valy/techwrite.html

  14. Discussion • Interpret data in light of published results • What principles have been established or reinforced? • What generalizations can be drawn? • How do your findings compare • To the findings of others • To expectations based on previous work? • Are there any theoretical/practical implications of your work? http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/marc/Sci-Writing.pdf

  15. Discussion • Highlight the most significant results • How do these results relate to the original question? • Do the data support your hypothesis? • Are your results consistent with the literature? http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/ug/research/paper.html

  16. Discussion • Summarize the results in first paragraph • Start with the specific • Criticize your data and place your observations in the context of the field • Then address the larger significance of the work to the field in general http://web.archive.org/web/20011127041109/www.hms.harvard.edu/fdd/comm/index.html

  17. Discussion • Explain what the results mean or why they differ from the literature • Interpret your results in light of published results • Include information from sources you cited in the Introduction and introduce new sources • Relate to the objectives in the Introduction • Make statements synthesizing all the evidence • Suggest future directions for research, new methods, explanations for deviations from the literature http://classweb.gmu.edu/biologyresources/ writingguide/scientificpaper.htm

  18. Discussion • Steps to organize discussion • Restate your question, hypothesis, and prediction. • Answer the question. • Write down the specific data, e.g. statistical tests. • State whether your results confirm the prediction and support the hypothesis. • Write down what you know in your experiment. How do your results fit in with what you know? What is the significance of your results? • List weaknesses you have identified in your experimental design. • List any problems that arose during the experiment itself. http://classweb.gmu.edu/biologyresources/ writingguide/scientificpaper.htm

  19. Effective discussion • Move from specific to general • Your findings  literature, theory, practice • Don't ignore or bury the major issue • Did the study achieve the goal presented in the Introduction? • Resolve the problem • Answer the question • Support the hypothesis • Make explanations complete • Give evidence for each conclusion. • Discuss possible reasons for expected & unexpected findings. • What to avoid • Don't over-generalize. • Don't ignore deviations in your data. • Avoid speculation that cannot be tested in the foreseeable future. http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/marc/Sci-Writing.pdf

  20. Effective discussion • What do your observations mean? • Summarize the most important findings at the beginning. • What conclusions can you draw? • Describe the patterns, principles, & relationships results show. • Explain how your results relate to expectations and to literature cited in your Introduction. Do they agree, contradict, or are they exceptions to the rule? • Explain plausibly any agreements, contradictions, or exceptions. • Describe what additional research might resolve contradictions or explain exceptions. • How do your results fit into a broader context? • Suggest the theoretical implications of your results. • Suggest practical applications of your results? • Extend your findings to other situations or other species. • Give the big picture: do your findings help us understand a broader topic? http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/marc/Sci-Writing.pdf

  21. Scientific writing • Writing order • Method • Results • Introduction • Discussion • Abstract • Title • Rules for what needs a citation • All direct quotations from another author • All substantial information taken from another source • One does not give a reference for well-known facts • Newton's Three Laws of Motion http://web.archive.org/web/20011127041109/www.hms.harvard.edu/fdd/comm/index.html

  22. Use of tense • Verb tense and voice • All formal technical writing uses the past tense • Describing methods and results • Use present tense for things that are true when the author writes about them and will still be true in the future when the text is read • Published information or accepted facts • Background information presented in the Introduction • Discuss your results and conclusions • Use of past tense • Abstract • Materials and Methods • Results sections • Introduction and Discussion sections when referring to your experiment http://www.rbs0.com/tw.htm

  23. A scientific paper • Title • Abstract • Introduction • Methods • Results • Discussions • Conclusions • Acknowledgement • References

  24. References • Scientific writing • Penn State University • http://www2.lv.psu.edu/jxm57/irp/sciwrit.html • Craft of scientific writing: a book • Michael Alley, Penn State • http://www.writing.eng.vt.edu/csw.html • Communicating our work • Brenda S. Hoffma, Harvard Medical School • http://web.archive.org/web/20011127041109/www.hms.harvard.edu/fdd/comm/index.html • Scientific writing • Natalie H. Kuldell • http://www.visionlearning.com/library/module_viewer.php?mid=123 • Writing a scientific research article • http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/ug/research/paper.html

More Related