1 / 12

Tools to Automate the S&I Platform

Tools to Automate the S&I Platform. A Proposal March 29, 2013. DRAFT. Growing Portfolio of Module Based Initiatives. But this has led to growing complexity and diverse designs, models and solutions. Doug Fridsma to HITPC – 3/14/13.

alessa
Télécharger la présentation

Tools to Automate the S&I Platform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tools to Automate the S&I Platform A Proposal March 29, 2013 DRAFT

  2. Growing Portfolio of Module Based Initiatives But this has led to growing complexity and diverse designs, models and solutions Doug Fridsma to HITPC – 3/14/13 DRAFT

  3. S&I Core Matrix Has Captured and Standardized S&I Initiatives . . . . . . as Shared, Reusable and Computable Components . . . Now we need a tool to use the Core Matrix DRAFT

  4. Tools to Automate the S&I Platform • S&I • Core Matrix • UCAT • IGAT Business Requirements and SMEs • USHIK • Registry • Repository • Link to NLM • NIST • Test Methods Standards Developers and Stewards Implementable Solutions CEDD/FHIM/CIMI Data Models and Mapping DRAFT

  5. DRAFT

  6. NIST Role (Kevin – Frederic to add bullets) • Experience with Use Case Authoring through Smart Grid • Developed automated test procedures, methods and tools for CEHRT and Mod Specs • UCAT is based on NIST platform with further specialization for the S&I Core Matrix by Art Greisser DRAFT

  7. Why UCAT First? • Foundational to all downstream automation and tools • Highest leverage is at the beginning analysis and design of an initiative • COnstructiveCOst Model – Overall effort is doubled if analysis is shortchanged • Correct is hard... but easier than later fix • Ounce of prevention • Measure twice, cut once • “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail” Ben Franklin • Use Cases • Study how users get value from system • Define how users interact with system • Help subsequent efforts deliver value • Are contracts between users & developers • Refer to Art Griesser Presentation in Appendix DRAFT

  8. Use Case Authoring Tool DRAFT

  9. UCAT Demonstration • NEED OUTLINE FROM ART • Show how to create a human readable, machine computable UC example from Core Matrix and UCAT DRAFT

  10. S&I Simplification – Demonstration of ConceptUse Case Tool Status Current Capabilities • Imported Core Matrix • Captured use case template structure • Populated completely for LRI • Can construct new use cases from reusable components • Can create human readable use cases (in UC template) • Can curate underlying UC information • Can use underlying info programmatically • SQL query • Import: CSV • UCAT Native • Simplification Core Matrix • ISO/HL7 10781/16527 EHR/PHR System Functional Models • Export: JSON, CSV • Ability to clone Additional Capabilities • Ability to track status of information • Component Lifecycle Management Next Steps • Add remaining 14 S&I Use Cases to UCAT • One-time manual entry • Resolving differences from template • Refine Core Matrix master template • USHIK Integration • S&I Data Integration • CEDD, FHIM, or CIMI . . . • Evaluate and design handoff to downstream tools • Implementation Guide Authoring • Testing Tools, MDHT, V2 … DRAFT

  11. Simplification – Automating the S&I PlatformBenefits S&I Platform • Capture Once, Re-Use Many Times • Each Re-Use Instance = x 1 Savings • Facilitate Cross S&I Initiative Coordination • Facilitate Cross Agency/Domain Coordination • Unlocking Value of S&I (maximizes re-use, return) • Experience Shows: • AHIC/HITSP: 4 Years, 17 Use Cases/Initiatives (4+/yr) • S&I: 2 Years, 13 Use Cases/Initiatives (6+/yr) • With UCAT: ? • With IGAT, With Test Methods? Automated Tools Faster, real world adoption DRAFT

  12. Appendices • Gary Dickinson Presentation - DRAFT Use Case Authoring Tool - Simplification Introduction • Art Greisser Presentation - "Use Cases" Slide Set • Frederick’s Presentation • Link to S&I Core Matrix • Link to USHIK S&I Pilot Site • Link UCAT Portal TBD DRAFT

More Related