1 / 28

Supernova Interaction with Dense Mass Loss

Supernova Interaction with Dense Mass Loss. Roger Chevalier University of Virginia. X-ray, Chandra. Type IIP supernovae. Shock breakout emission. Diffusive release of energy in H envelope. Radioactive tail ( 56 Co). Circumstellar interaction. X-ray and radio emission. IIn’s. Ia.

ally
Télécharger la présentation

Supernova Interaction with Dense Mass Loss

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supernova Interaction withDense Mass Loss Roger Chevalier University of Virginia X-ray, Chandra

  2. Type IIP supernovae Shock breakout emission Diffusive release of energy in H envelope Radioactive tail (56Co)

  3. Circumstellar interaction X-ray and radio emission

  4. IIn’s Ia IIP Zhang+ 12

  5. SN 2010jl Smith et al 2008 SN 2010jl Ha narrow P Cygni line 100 km/s el. scatt. wing NOT: Fransson…. Broad Ha formed by electron scattering in the wind (Chugai 2001 on SN 1998S) Requires Thomson optical depth of > 1 in the wind

  6. SN 2010jl 6000 K 1900 K 6 Fransson+ 13

  7. SN 2010jlX-Rays (Chandra) Dec 2010 (t=2 mnth), 7e41 ergs/s (unabs), NH~1e24 cm-2, T≥10 keV Oct 2011, 7e41 ergs/s, NH~3e23 cm-2, T≥10 keV Jun 2012, 5e41 ergs/s, NH~5e22 cm-2, T≥10 keV P. Chandra, RAC,…

  8. SN 2010jl Oct 2012 XMM NuSTAR Zoglauer, Ofek+ HEAD

  9. Optically thick (in optical) X-ray emission (radio absorbed) X-ray photoionized region At high densities, the hard, forward shock X-ray emission dominates

  10. Supernova in dense wind (rw=D/r2 to Rw) Radiation mediated shock transition covers optical depth c/vsh • tw>c/vsh • Radiation dominated shock propagates into wind • Radiation breakout when Rsh=Rd=kDvsh/c, characteristic diffusion radius in the wind • Viscous shock at larger radii

  11. Chevalier & Irwin 2011

  12. SN 2010gx and related objects: Rw<RdType I (Quimby objects) Pastorello et al. 2010

  13. Rw = 2.5×1015 cm, D = 1018 g cm−1, and E = 2 × 1051 erg (Ginzburg & Balberg 12) SN 2010gx

  14. Magnetar Models for SLSN-I Inserra+ 2013

  15. 1.5 x 1039 erg/s SN2006gy X-rays 1.5 x 1039 erg/s soft (Smith et al. 2007) < 1 x 1040 erg/s (Ofek et al. 2007) L(optical) ~ 2 x 1044 erg/s

  16. SN 2006gy SN 2010jl D*=1 0.1 M/yr at 100 km/s RAC + Irwin 2012

  17. Breakout X-rays decreased by • Inverse Compton cooling by photospheric photons more important than bremsstrahlung • Comptonization in the cool wind reduces energy of the highest energy photons • down to ~me c2/τ2 = 511/τ2 keV • Photoelectric absorption in the cool wind • Photoionization can be a factor

  18. Analogous to cooling accretion onto a white dwarf. Increasing optical depth to Thomson scattering until accretion reaches the Eddington rate, when t~c/vs WD Kylafis & Lamb 1982

  19. Rise to maximum due to rising T Grassberg, Imshennik, & Nadyozhin 1971

  20. SN 2006oz Days before max Leloudas et al. 12

  21. A clearer case of shock breakout SN 2011ht (IIn) Roming et al. 12

  22. SNe with dense surroundings What are they? Up to several M lost in yrs to 100s of years before the explosion Velocity of circumstellar matter typically 100s km/s

  23. Proposals for dense surroundings Mass loss driven by gravity-waves from convection in late burning phases (Quataert & Shiode 12) Pulsational pair instability (Woosley+ 07) Binaries (RAC 12, Barkov & Komissarov 11, Thone et al 12, Soker 12)

  24. Massive star binary Supernova Neutron star Common envelope Mass loss Inspiral stops outside core Inspiral continues NS/BH He star SN BH TZO SN Inspiral M loss + TZO SN BH

  25. NS + massive star Outcome depends on the initial period (separation) of binary or SN? Terman et al. 95

  26. SN IIn observations Binary scenario Outflow velocity related to escape velocity: 100’s of km/s Up to solar masses in <1000 yr before explosion Rate estimated from # of HMXBs >2e-4 yr-1 in Galaxy (Podsiadlowski…) Asymmetric mass loss • Narrow emission and absorption lines give 100 to 1000 km/s • Up to solar masses in 10’s to 100’s of yr before explosion • Rate is 4-7% of CCSN rate, so (8-13)e-4 yr-1 in Galaxy (W. Li,….) • Asymmetry

  27. Rest+ 2011 SN 2003ma Radiated ~4e51 ergs over 4.7 yr Estimate >1052 ergs explosion energy

  28. Conclusions • Most core collapse supernovae have low density surroundings, consistent with the progenitor star wind • Some supernovae have dense surroundings • An extended, optically thick medium gives IIn characteristics • They can be optically highly luminous, although X-ray faint • Superluminous supernovae without “n” characteristics may also be powered by dense interaction • Reason for the dense mass loss uncertain – common envelope evolution is a suggestion

More Related