1 / 48

The Supernova Rate with WFXT

The Supernova Rate with WFXT. M. Della Valle INAF -Napoli. SN 1994D. P. Rosati , M. Paolillo D. De Martino, S. Campana , L. Stella. +. Outline. SN classification X-ray from SNe Ejecta vs - CSM Interaction Shock Break-out/failed GRB GRBs

dooley
Télécharger la présentation

The Supernova Rate with WFXT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Supernova Rate with WFXT M. Della Valle INAF-Napoli SN 1994D P. Rosati, M. Paolillo D. De Martino, S. Campana, L. Stella +

  2. Outline • SN classification • X-ray from SNe • Ejectavs- CSM Interaction • Shock Break-out/failed GRB • GRBs • Exotics objects (Dark SNe, LBV-SNe, Monsters…. Ia?) • Conclusions Bologna, 2009

  3. Supernova Classification IIp (P-Cygni), IIb Core collapse of massive single stars II II l, IIn(Balmer emission) H Core collapse of massive stars (likely) in binary systems SNe Ic (weak He) Ib (strong He) No H Thermonuclear explosion of white dwarfs I Ia (strong Si) Bologna, 2009

  4. Supernova Classification IIp (P-Cygni), IIb Core collapse of massive single stars II II l, IIn(Balmer emission) H Core collapse of massive stars (likely) in binary systems SNe Ic (weak He) High KE=GRB-SNe Ib (strong He) No H Thermonuclear explosion of white dwarfs I Ia (strong Si) Bologna, 2009

  5. X-ray from SNe X-ray from interaction between SN ejecta and CSM X-ray from SN Shock Break-out (or failed GRB) X-ray from GRBs

  6. H II ISM CSM ~10 km/s RSG Reverse shock ~103 km/s; 107 K Forward shock ~ 104 km/s; 109 K

  7. Luminosity from Interaction: ejecta vs. CSM SN 1941C SN 1959D SN 1968D SN 1980K SN 1992ad SN 1993J SN 1994I SN 2004et SN 2006bp

  8. Distance Distribution

  9. D ~ 10 Mpc & L ~ 5x1038 erg/s; Δt ~ 107 s >> 4ks and 13ks and > 400 ks wide < 35 Mpc medium < 100 Mpc deep < 370 Mpc

  10. OUTPUT • Indirect measurements of the SN rate • The X-ray luminosity is a function of the density of the CSM and ejecta velocities  properties of the CSM (ρ, v)  mass loss of the progenitor stars of SNe (N.B. one of the most poorly constrained astrophysical quantity) Bologna, 2009

  11. In the Shock Break-out Arena The X-ray transient 080109/SN 2008D was serendipitously discovered by XRT (Berger & Soderberg 2008) while Swift was observing SN 2007uy

  12. Soderberg et al. 2008 Modjaz et al. 2008 Malesani et al. 2008 Chevalier & Fransson 2008 Xu et al. 2008 Li et al. 2008 Mazzali et al. 2008 Tanaka et al. 2008 Wang et al. 2008 Tanaka et al. 2009

  13. The associated X- flare is a softer and fainter version of a GRB

  14. SupernovaShock Break-out Soderberg et al. 2008 Wang et al. 2008 Modjaz et al. 2008 Chevalier & Fransson 2008

  15. Failed GRB SNe GRBs Mazzali et al. 2008; Tanaka et al. 2008, 2009 Li 2008; Xu et al. 2008

  16. + Shock break-out The presence of : • a dim peak in the optical lightcurve • the softness of the X-ray emission • the Energy budget ~ 1046 erg is close to the predicted shock breakout radiation energy of “standard” SNe-Ibc (Matzner and McKee 1999)

  17. + Failed GRB • SN 2008D is not a “standard” CC event (EK)

  18. The theoretical modelling of the lightcurve and spectra of SN 2008D (Tanaka et al. 2008) finds a progenitor mass on the main sequence of about 25 M and a kinetic energy of 6 x 1051 erg.  SN 2008D has a significantly higher energy than “standard” CC-SNe (~1051 erg) although less than GRB-HNe (~1052 erg)  it is unlikely that all CC-SNe can produce a X-ray flash like 080109

  19. + Failed GRB • SN 2008D is not a “standard” CC event (EK) • The similarities between 060218 and 080109 (lightcurves and both match the Amati relationship) suggest that this X-ray transient is a weaker version of a GRB event • the shock break-out theory predicts that the radiation spectrum is thermal-dominated. The observed one is a power-law (though see Wang et al. 2008 ) iv) Polarization

  20. X-Ray 080109 matches the Amati Relationship Bologna, 2009

  21. Lpeak~ 3 x 1043 erg/s i) Learly~3 x 1041 erg/s Δt ~ 103s ii) Llate~ 1040 erg/s, Δt ~ 104s D=31 Mpc fearly ~ 2.6 x 10-12 erg cm-2s-1 flate~ 8.6 x 10-14 erg cm-2s-1 treshearly ~ 10-13 erg cm-2s-1 treshlate ~ 8x10-15erg cm-2s-1 Dearly < 160 Mpcz < 0.04 Dlate < 102 Mpcz < 0.025 Bologna, 2009

  22. Shock Break-out detections Cappellaro et al. 1999; Mannucci et al. 2005, Guetta & DV 2007 early late II = 3.51 x 10-2 deg2 yr-1 8.78 x 10-3 deg-2 s-1 Ibc = 1.17 x 10-2 deg2 yr-1 2.93 x 10-3 deg-2 s-1 Ia = 1.40 x 10-2 deg2 yr-1 3.51 x 10-3 deg-2 s-1 HNe = 5.85 x 10-4 deg2 yr-1 1.47 x 10-4 deg-2 s-1

  23. OUTPUT • Clarify the conundrum Shock Break-out/Failed GRB  physics of the SN explosion + optical follow-up Bologna, 2009

  24. OUTPUT • Clarify the conundrum Shock Break-out/Failed GRB  physics of the SN explosion • Independent measurement of the CC-SN rate (alternative method to “boring” optical/NIR SN surveys) Bologna, 2009

  25. Direct detections GRBs Lpeak~ 5 x 1046 erg Llate~ 5 x1043 erg, Δt ~ 104s D=130 Mpc flate~ 5 x 10-11 erg cm-2s-1 treshlate ~ 10-14erg cm-2s-1 Dlate (L) < 104Mpcz < 1.4 Bologna, 2009

  26. How representative of GRB Pop is it ? courtesy of R. Margutti Bologna, 2009

  27. GRBs/SNe-I(b)c:0.4%-0.7% (Guetta & DV 2007,Soderberg et al. 2009) (<3 % and <4.5% at 99% c.l.) Bologna, 2009

  28. SN Time Machine N z

  29. 300 Ibc deg-2 yr-1 SNeIbc = 588 deg-2 yr-1

  30. GRB/SNe-I(b)c:0.4%-0.7% (Guetta & DV 2007,Soderberg et al. 2009) (<3 % and <4.5% at 99% c.l.) 300Ibc deg-2 yr-1 HL-GRBs LL-GRBs Bologna, 2009

  31. Peculiar Events (< 5% CC-SNe) Bologna, 2009

  32. Low redshift:z = 0.125 SN search? E vai……!!!! Gehrels et al. 2006 Mangano et al. 2007 Bologna, 2009 0s 50s100s

  33. Factor >100 Dark SNe? Late time: host galaxy contribution(no variation) Upper limit: MV > -13.5 (3) Bologna, 2009 Della Valle et al. 2006; Gal-Yamet al. 2006; Fynboet al. 2006

  34. LBV-SNe Pastorelloet al. 2006 SN 2006jc Dec 2001 Oct 2004 21 Sept 2006 29 Oct 2006 The pre-explosion transient appears similar to the giant outbursts of Luminous Blue Variables (LBV) of 60-100 M. The massive star has exploded “prematurely” during the LBV phase preventing the progenitor to explode as a W-R Bologna, 2009

  35. The progenitor of SN2006jc was hydrogen deficient. An LBV-like outburst of a Wolf- Rayet star could be invoked, but this would be the first observational evidence of such a phenomenon. Bologna, 2009

  36. The Monster SN 2006gy Bologna, 2009

  37. Type IIn AV ~ 1.8+0.4-0.3 mag Smith et al. 2008 Smith & McKray 2007 Ofek et al. 2007 Agnoletto et al. 2009 Kawabata et al. 2009 Woosley et al. 2007 Bologna, 2009

  38. SN 2006gy is H-rich Type IIn ! Bologna, 2009

  39. Pair-instability Supernova (Smith et al. 2008) • Collision between high velocity shells originated in • subsequent outbursts of a very massive star undergoing • structural instabilities caused by pair production • (pulsational pair-instability, Woosley et al. 2007). • Thermonuclear or massive star (Ofek et al. 2008) • Strong interaction of the SN ejecta with “very dense” and • “clumpy” LBV environment (~ 10M) + 3M of 56Ni • (Agnoletto et al. 2009; Kawabata et al. 2008) • Progenitor Mass  60-100 M. LBV progenitor? • Canonical stellar evolution “predicts” that the progenitors of CC-SNe should experience the collapse of the core (i.e. the SN explosion) during the red Supergiant or W-R phases Bologna, 2009

  40. Bologna, 2009

  41. X-ray from SNe-Ia • Double degenarate: where two C-O WDs in a binary systems make coalescence as result of the lost of orbital energy for GWs (Webbink 1984; Iben & Tutukov 1984) • Single Degenerate: Cataclysmic-like systems: RNe(WD+giant, WD+He) Symbiotic systems(WD+Mira or red giant) Supersoft X-ray Sources(WD+MS star) Bologna, Nov, 2009

  42. X-ray from Ia ? Immler et al. 2006 v Bologna, 2009

  43. Conclusions • X-ray from Ejecta – CSM Interaction: ~ 100 detections (II+Ibc) • Ia detections ? If 2005ke is representative of Ia population, yes • Shock break-out: ~ 2500 Ibcdetections (w+m+d) and ~ 120well observed events. Possibility to resolve the break-out/failed GRB ambiguity. • ~ 8000 (350) detections if also type II display such a behaviour • GRBs: ~ 25-250 HL-events (m+ d), < 600 LL-GRBs • Output:Independent measurements of SN rates. GRB beaming factors • Chances to enter into unknown “territories” (Dark SNe, LBV-SNe, Super-Bright SNe (pair instability?), unusual transients) < 100 events. • Need for Optical/NIR Follow-up Bologna, 2009

  44. To Do List • SN Thresholds • SFR • correction for absorption Bologna, 2009

More Related