1 / 4

Development of CSU Learning Environment: Strategies and Tools for Enhanced Student Engagement

This document outlines the evolution of the CSU Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) from July 2004 through 2008. Initially focused on improving communication and assessment methods, the VLE aimed to integrate various learning technologies and foster collaborative student experiences. Key developments include the selection of Sakai as the primary platform, the establishment of multi-disciplinary working groups, and the introduction of online marking and grade submission systems. Emphasis on continuous improvement, user feedback, and the examination of emerging trends in higher education are also highlighted.

alta
Télécharger la présentation

Development of CSU Learning Environment: Strategies and Tools for Enhanced Student Engagement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interact History July 2004 Development of CSU Learning environment ILSC Best of breed strategy Monitor emerging trends Australian Universities Multi-disciplinary, widely represented working party

  2. Circulation of VLE report Improved synchronous communication Online marking assignments submitted electronically Online submission of grades Student presentation area Grade book system Assessment Shared group workspace for students VLE ILSC Short listed 4 working groups formed Faculties & Divisions Initial consultation Investigate learning technologies Oct 2004 Potential contribution to learning Surveys for priorities

  3. Differences? Overall philosophy Features & functionality May 2006 OLE Increased access & control Sakai vs. Moodle Sakai selected VLE ILSC High % of Uni users Unlimited roles & levels Structured governance model Technical community

  4. wiki Phased approach Interact blog chat ePortfolio forum Sakai vs. Moodle Web content integrated Resources announcements VLE ILSC schedule Trials 2007 Fully integrated with other CSU systems 2008

More Related