1 / 5

BoF : Membership Changes

BoF : Membership Changes. Proposal 1 : 1 vote per member. Many international organisations have one vote per member APNIC not a country, but company 1 Vote 1 member is more democratic Concern if associate member get a vote (no resources)

althea
Télécharger la présentation

BoF : Membership Changes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BoF: Membership Changes

  2. Proposal1: 1 vote per member Many international organisations have one vote per member APNIC not a country, but company 1 Vote 1 member is more democratic Concern if associate member get a vote (no resources) Proposal doesn't consider NIR, who has many sub members General view on the floor was mixed but interested to discuss further • Floor supported setting up a working group to discuss further • Propose setting up the working group – Objections? • Call for Chair of the working group - role

  3. Proposal 2: GAC Balanced response from the members, generally supportive of promoting involvement of government Other RIRs explained their structure of having a working group rather than formal Council Result there were some changes by the presenter to request a working group similar to ARIN/RIPE, not a formal company or governance structural change This had the support of the community • Floor supported setting up a working group to discuss further • Propose setting up the working group – Objections? • Call for Chair of the working group - role

  4. Proposal 3: Limit for EC Terms Questioned the lack of disadvantages in proposal Questioned implication that longer termECsmay inappropriate assets New EC considered a good thing by the floor, Experience also considered positive Currently 3 ECs are less than 1 term, 1 Vacant • Floor supported dropping the proposal

  5. Proposal 3: 1 vote per member

More Related