1 / 37

9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku Univ.

JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Analysis Status of Heavy targets data of HES-HKS. 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku Univ. Toshi yuki Gogami. Contents. Data summary & rate conditions

alvin-matthews
Télécharger la présentation

9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku Univ.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting/ JSPS Core to Core SeminarAnalysis Status of Heavy targets data of HES-HKS 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  2. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  3. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary H2O 52Cr CH2 12C Targets after the experiment HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  4. Data Summary JLab E05-115 (2009/June – 2009/Nov) HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  5. e , e+ background in GEANT simulation HKS • Generated particle : e+ • Distribution : spherical uniform • Momentum : 860 – 1000 [MeV/c] • Angle : 0 – 2 [mrad] • 1000 events KDC1 KDC2 e- , e+ Vacuum chamber (sus304) e+ NMR port (sus304) HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  6. Rates of the HKS TOF detectors HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  7. Multiplicity of typical layer of chamber HKS HES ~1.13 ~2.24 ~4.94 ~1.28 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  8. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  9. Discrepancy of Number of Λ (Before new tracking code adoption) CH2 Target H2O Target Λ Λ • The number of Λ • NΛ ¼ Nexpect • The number of Λ • NΛNexpect Lost events that we are interested in in tracking procedure. Very preliminary Very preliminary Σ0 Σ0 12C quasi-free 16O quasi-free Acc. b.g. Acc. b.g. REAL DATA REAL DATA Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  10. Results of Introduction of new Tracking Code CH2 • NΛ¼ Nexpect  NΛ½ Nexpect Increased ! 52Cr Increased ! H2O HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  11. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary Event display of HES detectors HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  12. Drift Chamber plane efficiency YES YES YES YES YES • Other requirements • HKS • 1X&1Y&2X • HES • EH1&EH2 Extracted Track No No HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  13. Tracking efficiency • HKS (KDC1 & KDC2) • 5/6 & 5/6 • HES (EDC1) • 8/10 • ・・・・・・ • ・・・・・・ • ・・・・・・ HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  14. Analyzed runs *ch276323763247632576326763277637676377763787637976380 *b76124761257612676127761287628576286762877628876289 *cr1 75997759987599976000760017601676017760187601976020 *li76197761987619976200762017627176272762737627476275 *h2o75902759037590475908759097597175972759737597475975 *c75951759527595375954759677683976840768417684276843 *be76589765907659176592765947662976630766317663276633 *cr2 77098770997710077101771027712077121771227712377124 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  15. Tracking efficiency • ~~~~ HKS (5/6 & 5/6)~~~~~~~ch2 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.998974 +- 0.00760814 (0.761596%)h2o : Tracking Efficiency : 0.961109 +- 0.00190445 (0.198152%)li : Tracking Efficiency : 0.996378 +- 0.0205954 (2.06703%)be : Tracking Efficiency : 0.995274 +- 0.00535923 (0.538468%)b : Tracking Efficiency : 0.99921 +- 0.00912634 (0.913356%)c : Tracking Efficiency : 0.987929 +- 0.00179032 (0.181219%)cr1 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.974892 +- 0.00304261 (0.312097%)cr2 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.965851 +- 0.00320905 (0.332251% ) • ~~~~ HES (8/10) ~~~~~~~ch2 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00527844 (0.527844%)h2o : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00095474 (0.095474%)li : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.0172701 (1.72701%)be : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00419163 (0.419163%)b : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00820523 (0.820523%)c : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00153384 (0.153384%)cr1 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00100727 (0.100727%)cr2 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00103985 (0.103985%) 1 ….!? Need to check the tracking code If there is a bias to use 10/10, 9/10 and 8/10 are possible to be thrown. HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  16. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  17. Events which are discarded KDC2 KDC1 52Cr, 77124 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  18. Events which are discarded KDC2 • Where and why are these events discarded ? • Are these events threw away by correct cut condition? KDC1 52Cr, 77124 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  19. Events which are discarded KDC2 ~10% up • Where and why are these events discarded ? • Are these events threw away by correct cut condition? KDC1 52Cr, 77124 h_pattern_recognition.f HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  20. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  21. x-t function calibration Fitting Function Black : |WC-TC| Magenta : Profile of |WC-TC| Green : x-t calc. Track Track coordinate Wire center 0 s Drift distance |Wire center – Track coordinate| HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  22. x-t calibration for 52Cr Target • Residuals better • KDC1 ; 400 [μm]  300 [μm] • Number up • ~10% increased at χ2 <20 • (~5% increased without χ2 cut) χ2 cut condition HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  23. Contents • Data summary & rate conditions • Improvement we did for high multiplicity data • What need to be done • Tracking code of HES • Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage • Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) • Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  24. Summary & What we need to do • Parameter tune • x-t function calibration • TOF counters calibration • Cut condition optimization • Optimization of the cuts in the tracking code • Tracking code of HES • Too good tracking efficiency • Prefer 10/10 events ? • Estimate hidden efficiencies • Miss identification rate in the tracking stage • By using GEANT simulation • Trigger efficiency (TOF, AC over kill, TUL.....) HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  25. END JLab E05-115 collaboration, 2009, JLab Hall-C HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  26. Rates of the KDC Layers CH2, 76314 KDC2 KDC1 ~3 MHz ~6 MHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  27. Rates of the KDC Layers H2O, 75971 KDC2 KDC1 ~10 MHz ~20 MHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  28. Rates of the KDC Layers 52Cr, 76314 KDC2 KDC1 ~11 MHz ~22 MHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  29. Rates of the KDC wires CH2, 76314 KDC1-u KDC1-u’ KDC1-x KDC1-x’ KDC1-v KDC1-v’ < 150 kHz < 120 kHz Rate [kHz] Wire Number KDC2-u’ KDC2-x KDC2-x’ KDC2-v KDC2-v’ KDC2-u < 70 kHz < 60 kHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  30. Rates of the KDC wires H2O, 75971 KDC1-u KDC1-u’ KDC1-x KDC1-x’ KDC1-v KDC1-v’ < 450 kHz < 270 kHz Rate [kHz] Wire Number KDC2-u’ KDC2-x KDC2-x’ KDC2-v KDC2-v’ KDC2-u < 250 kHz < 200 kHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  31. Rates of the KDC wires 52Cr, 77124 KDC1-u KDC1-u’ KDC1-x KDC1-x’ KDC1-v KDC1-v’ < 510 kHz < 350 kHz Rate [kHz] Wire Number KDC2-u’ KDC2-x KDC2-x’ KDC2-v KDC2-v’ KDC2-u < 290 kHz < 230 kHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  32. x-t calibration for H2O Target • Residual better • Number up • 10% increased at χ2 <20 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami

  33. Singles rate summary HKS Up to ~30 [MHz] HKS trigger ~ 10[kHz] HES Up to ~15 [MHz] COIN 2.0 [kHz] HES trigger ~ a few[MHz] HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami

  34. B.G. mix rate (real data) b a B.G mix rate = HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami * hks ntulpe

  35. e+ simulation • To see • Number of event • Angle & momentum of e+ generated in target SIMULATION HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami

  36. Target thickness dependence(Simulation) SIMULATION H2O 52Cr 9Be 12C CH2 10B 7Li Consistent with B.G. mix rate ! HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami

  37. Tracking in HKS(pattern recognition) y y • Make combination of hit wire belong to one space point for tracking • pre tracking x x Test point Space point HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami

More Related